首页|不同脉冲间隔时间行程控硬膜外脉冲式注射对分娩镇痛的影响

不同脉冲间隔时间行程控硬膜外脉冲式注射对分娩镇痛的影响

扫码查看
目的 观察不同间隔时间行程控硬膜外脉冲式注射(PIEB)和连续硬膜外输注(CEI)对于分娩镇痛效果的影响。方法 选择要求行分娩镇痛的单胎足月顺产初产妇229例,采用数字表法随机分为三组:PIEB模式间隔30 min组(P30组,n=77)、PIEB模式间隔60 min组(P60组,n=76)和CEI模式组(C组,n=76)。产妇侧卧位于L3-4间隙行硬膜外穿刺,均使用首次剂量0。08%罗哌卡因+0。3μg/mL舒芬太尼混合镇痛液10 mL。P30组给药间隔30 min,单次脉冲剂量5 mL,P60组给药间隔60 min,单次脉冲剂量10 mL,C组10 mL/h恒速输注。镇痛泵配方为0。08%罗哌卡因+0。3μg/mL舒芬太尼共150 mL,PCEA量5 mL,锁定时间10 min。观察镇痛前、镇痛后1 h、2 h、3 h、4 h、宫口开全时、分娩时宫缩视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分和Bromage评分。记录有效自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)次数、硬膜外用药总量、产程时间及不良反应的发生情况。结果 三组产妇在分娩镇痛开始后VAS评分均低于镇痛前(P<0。05)。P30组和P60组镇痛后3 h、4 h、宫口开全及分娩时VAS评分低于C组(P<0。05),P60组宫口开全及分娩时VAS评分低于P30组(P<0。05)。P30组和P60组镇痛用药总量和有效PCEA次数低于C组(P<0。05),P60组有效PCEA次数低于P30组(P<0。05)。P60组满意度高于P30和C组(P<0。05)。三组产程时间、Bromage评分、不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义。结论 PIEB用于分娩镇痛可达到更好的镇痛效果,且间隔60 min行PIEB模式注射是一种更理想的给药方法。
Effect of programmed intermittent epidural bolus at different interval time for labor analgesia
[Objective]To compare the clinical efficacy of programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) with continuous epidural infusion (CEI) at different interval time for labor analgesia.[Methods]A total of 229 primiparous full-term singleton pregnant women requiring labor analgesia were randomly divided into three groups:PIEB mode at an interval of 30 min group (group P30,n=77),PIEB mode at an interval of 60 min group (group P60,n=76) and traditional CEI mode group (group C,n=76).Epidural catheters was placed at the L3-4 interspace with the subject in lateral position.Epidural solution was 0.08% ropivacaine and 0.3 μg/mL sufentanil,and the initial loading dose was 10 mL.PIEB regimens were programmed as bolus 5 mL per 30 min starting from 30 min after analgesia began in group P30 and bolus 10 mL per 60 min starting from 60 min after analgesia began in group P60.Group C received continuous infusion at 10 mL/h immediately when analgesia began.The patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) dose was 5 mL with a 10 minutes lockout.The drugs used in the pump were 0.08% ropivacaine and 0.3 μg/mL sufentanil in three groups.Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and modified Bromage scores were recorded before labor analgesia,1,2,3 and 4 hours after labor analgesia,at full dilation of the cervix and during delivery.The consumption of anesthetic,the number of pressing of self-controlled analgesia pump,and occurrence of adverse reactions were recorded.[Results]The VAS scores obviously decreased in the three groups since receiving labor analgesia (P<0.05).Compared with group C,the VAS scores of group P30 and group P60 were decreased 3 and 4 hours after labor analgesia,at full dilation of the cervix and during delivery (P<0.05).The VAS scores of group P60 at the uterus fully opened and delivery were lower than those in group P30 (P<0.05).The total drug consumption and the number of PCEA were decreased obviously in group P30 and group P60 (P<0.05).The effective frequency of PCEA in group P60 was less than that in group P30 (P<0.05).The analgesia satisfaction in group P60 was higher than that in group P30 and group C (P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the duration of labor,Bromage score,occurrence of adverse reactions among the three groups.[Conclusion]PIEB provides reliable efficacy for labor analgesia and PIEB injection at an interval time of 60 min is an ideal method.

labor analgesiaepidural blockprogrammed intermittent epidural bolus

胡翠霞、王君、李珍、陈亮

展开 >

湖南省妇幼保健院麻醉科,湖南 长沙 410008

分娩镇痛 硬膜外阻滞 程控硬膜外脉冲式注射

2024

中国医学工程
中国医药生物技术协会 卫生部肝胆肠外科研究中心

中国医学工程

影响因子:0.504
ISSN:1672-2019
年,卷(期):2024.32(12)