首页|低管电压联合顺适性低剂量容积双空间迭代重建技术在头颈部CT血管成像中的应用

低管电压联合顺适性低剂量容积双空间迭代重建技术在头颈部CT血管成像中的应用

Low Tube Voltage Combined with Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction Using Three-Dimensional Processing in Head and Neck CT Angiography

扫码查看
目的 探讨低管电压联合顺适性低剂量容积双空间迭代重建技术(AIDR 3D)在头颈部CT血管成像(CTA)中对图像质量、辐射剂量及穿支动脉显示的影响,以期获得最佳扫描方案.资料与方法 回顾性纳入 2020年 10 月—2022 年1 月于上海市公共卫生临床中心行头颈部CTA检查的90例患者,根据不同扫描条件分为3组,每组30例.A组扫描参数为120 kV和300 mA,B组扫描参数为 100 kV,自动毫安,C组扫描参数为 80 kV,自动毫安,3 组均采用AIDR 3D算法进行数据重建,测量3 组图像的肌肉和动脉CT强化值、噪声标准差(SD)、信噪比(SNR)、对比噪声比(CNR)、CT容积剂量指数(CTDIvol)、剂量长度乘积(DLP)、辐射有效剂量(ED).将获得数据进行后处理,获取多方位血管图像,对图像质量进行主观评分,并观察甲状腺上动脉穿支血管显示情况.对比 3 组图像在图像质量(图像质量主观评分、SNR、CNR、SD)、辐射剂量(CTDIvol、DLP、ED)及穿支动脉显示方面的差异.结果 3组在C4、C7椎体水平图像评分均≥3分,C7椎体水平图像主观评分为4分者B组最多(93.3%),A组次之(80.0%),C组最低(66.7%)(P<0.05);C4椎体水平图像质量的主观评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).不同血管节段,B组SNR[(33.46±3.46)Hu]及CNR[(29.18±3.14)Hu]均略低于C组[(38.58±3.65)Hu、(34.26±3.58)Hu],但高于A 组[(27.47±3.23)Hu、(22.17±3.12)Hu,P<0.05].B 组 CTDIvol[(4.16±1.14)mGy]、DLP[(167.75±46.82)mGy·cm]和ED[(0.43±0.15)mSv]均低于A组[(8.51±2.13)mGy、(280.16±26.34)mGy·cm和(1.00±0.08)mSv],且DLP及ED较A组降低明显,仅略高于C组[(3.47±0.62)mGy、(139.06±25.37)mGy·cm和(0.34±0.08)mSv].在甲状腺上动脉穿支血管显示方面,B组的显示比例最高(20 例,66.7%),明显高于A组(15 例,50.0%)和C组(10例,33.3%)(P<0.05).结论 行头颈部CTA扫描,由AIDR 3D执行数据重建时,当扫描参数为 100 kV、自动毫安,可在保证图像质量的同时,有效控制辐射剂量,对穿支动脉显示效果最佳,推荐临床使用.
Purpose To investigate the effect of low tube voltage combined with adaptive iterative dose reduction using three-dimensional processing(AIDR 3D)on image quality,radiation dose and perforating arteries in head and neck CT angiography(CTA)in order to obtain the best scanning solution.Materials and Methods A total of 90 patients who underwent head and neck CTA examination in Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center from October 2020 to January 2022 were retrospectively divided into three groups according to different scanning conditions,with 30 cases in each group.The scanning parameters of group A were 120 kV and 300 mA,group B was 100 kV and automatic mA,and group C was 80 kV and automatic mA.AIDR 3D algorithm was used for data reconstruction in all three groups.Muscular and arterial CT intensification values,noise standard deviation(SD),signal-to-noise ratio(SNR),contrast noise ratio(CNR),CT dose index volume(CTDIvol),dose-length product(DLP),and radiation effective dose(ED)were measured.After post-processing,the obtained data were obtained to obtain multi-directional vascular images,and the image quality was subjectively scored,and the display of perforator vessels of superior thyroid artery was observed.The differences of image quality(subjective score of image quality,SNR,CNR,SD),radiation dose(CTDIvol,DLP,ED)and perforator artery display among the three groups were compared.Results The subjective score of C7 image quality was 4 in group B(93.3%),followed by group A(80.0%),and the lowest in group C(66.7%)(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in subjective score of C4 level image quality(P>0.05).In different vascular segments,the SNR[(33.46±3.46)Hu]and CNR[(29.18±3.14)Hu]in group B were slightly lower than those in group C[(38.58±3.65)Hu and(34.26±3.58)Hu].But it was higher than that in group A[(27.47±3.23)Hu,(22.17±3.12)Hu](P<0.05).CTDIvol[(4.16±1.14)mGy],DLP[(167.75±46.82)mGy·cm]and ED[(0.43±0.15)mSv]in group B were lower than those in group A[(8.51±2.13)mGy,(280.16±26.34)mGy·cm and(1.00±0.08)mSv].The DLP and ED of group A were significantly lower than those of group A,but only slightly higher than those of group C[(3.47±0.62)mGy,(139.06±25.37)mGy·cm and(0.34±0.08)mSv].In terms of superior thyroid artery perforators,the display ratio of group B was the highest(20 cases,66.7%),significantly higher than that of group A(15 cases,50.0%)and group C(10 cases,33.3%)(P<0.05).Conclusion When the head and neck CTA is scanned and data reconstruction is performed by AIDR 3D,best results are observed when the scan parameters are 100 kV,automatic milliamperes,with effectively controlling in the radiation dose,ensuring the image quality and the best displaying effect on perforating arteries,which is recommended for clinical use.

Computed tomography angiographyRadiation dosageSignal-to-noise ratioImage processing,computer-assisted

丁晨寒、宋凤祥、杨泽铖

展开 >

上海市(复旦大学附属)公共卫生临床中心放射科,上海 201508

CT血管造影术 辐射剂量 信噪比 图像处理,计算机辅助

上海市卫生健康委项目

202140084

2024

中国医学影像学杂志
中国医学影像技术研究会

中国医学影像学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.37
ISSN:1005-5185
年,卷(期):2024.32(4)
  • 24