摘要
目的:构建呼吸与危重症医学科医疗设备可靠性管理模式,探究其在呼吸与危重症医学科医疗设备管理中的应用效果.方法:以设备管理内容和管理方法的可靠性为评估指标,形成设备使用、清洁和应急管理规范化流程,构建呼吸与危重症医学科医疗设备可靠性管理模式,采用失效模式与影响分析(FMEA)、故障模式影响及危害性分析(FMECA)和威布尔分析方法进行可靠性分析.选取2022年1月至2023年1月首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院呼吸与危重症医学科在用的63台医疗设备,依据管理模式不同,分别采用常规管理模式(32台)和可靠性管理模式(31台),对比两种管理模式的设备管理指标评分、设备目标达成度和设备管理缺陷率以及设备使用管理的工程师、操作技师和医生对两种管理模式的设备管理认可度评分.结果:设备使用管理的工程师、操作技师和医生对采用可靠性管理模式的认可度平均评分分别为(90.66±5.25)分、(91.54±4.14)分和(92.17±5.17)分,均高于常规管理模式的认可度评分,差异有统计学意义(t=14.249、13.773、12.267,P＜0.05);采用可靠性管理模式的设备资源配置、信息技术、技术支撑和管理绩效指标平均评分分别为(90.25±4.12)分、(92.45±3.26)分、(91.47±2.78)分和(90.25±3.11)分,均高于常规管理模式,差异有统计学意义(t=12.122、18.379、15.581、14.141,P＜0.05);采用可靠性管理模式的设备使用规范度、清洗完成度和应急管理及时性平均评分分别为(92.36±3.25)分、(90.69±3.69)分和(91.87±3.01)分,均高于常规管理模式,差异有统计学意义(t=14.953、15.030、14.401,P＜0.05).采用可靠性管理模式的设备损坏、维修和返厂台数分别为1、1和2台,其缺陷率分别为3.22%、3.22%和6.45%,均低于常规管理模式,差异有统计学意义(x2=8.581、9.908、8.782,P＜0.05).结论:基于可靠性的呼吸与危重症医学科医疗设备管理模式应用于呼吸与危重症医学科医疗设备管理,能提升设备管理与运行质量,降低设备故障率,改善设备服务水平.
Abstract
Objective:To construct a reliability management model of medical equipment in the department of respiratory and critical care medicine,and to explore its application effect in the management of medical equipment in the department of respiratory and critical care medicine.Methods:Taking the reliability of equipment management content and management methods as evaluation indexes,standardized procedures of equipment use,cleaning and emergency management were formed,and a reliability management model for medical equipment in the department of respiratory and critical care medicine was constructed.A total of 63 medical devices in clinical use in the Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine of Beijing Anzhen Hospital,Capital Medical University from January 2022 to January 2023 were selected.According to different management modes,conventional management mode(32 devices)and reliability management mode(31 devices)were adopted respectively.The equipment management index score,equipment goal achievement degree and equipment management defect rate,and the equipment management recognition scores of the engineers,equipment operation technicians and doctors of equipment use management were compared between the two management modes.Results:The average recognition scores of the engineers,operating technicians and doctors for the use of equipment of the reliability management model were(90.66±5.25)points,(91.54±4.14)points and(92.17±5.17)points,respectively,which were higher than those of the conventional management model,the difference was statistically significant(t=14.249,13.773,12.267,P<0.05).The average scores of equipment resource allocation,information technology,technical support and management performance indicators of the reliability management mode were(90.25±4.12)points,(92.45±3.26)points,(91.47±2.78)points and(90.25±3.11)points,respectively,which were higher than those of conventional management mode,the difference was statistically significant(t=12.122,18.379,15.581,14.141,P<0.05).The average scores of equipment use standardization,cleaning completion and emergency management timeliness of reliability management mode were(92.36±3.25)points,(90.69±3.69)points and(91.87±3.01)points,respectively,which were higher than those of the conventional management mode,the difference was statistically significant(t=14.953,15.030,14.401,P<0.05).The number of equipment damaged,repaired and factory repair of the reliability management mode was 1,1 and 2,respectively,and the defect rates were 3.22%,3.22%and 6.45%,respectively,which were lower than those of the conventional management mode,the difference was statistically significant(x2=8.581,9.908,8.782,P<0.05).Conclusion:The application of reliability-based medical equipment management model to the medical equipment management of respiratory and critical care medicine can improve the quality of equipment management and operation,reduce the failure rate of equipment,and improve the service level of equipment.
维普
万方数据