中国药学杂志2024,Vol.59Issue(18) :1764-1772.DOI:10.11669/cpj.2024.18.013

中、美、欧、日药典机构和药品监管机构发布的相近内容通用技术要求的比较研究

Comparison of General Technical Requirements for Similar Content Published by Pharmacopoeia Agencies and Drug Regulatory Agencies in China,United States,Europe,and Japan

徐昕怡 于文力 李丹 王冠男 李衡 王芸 刘贞 陶乐然 宋皞昀 杨昭鹏
中国药学杂志2024,Vol.59Issue(18) :1764-1772.DOI:10.11669/cpj.2024.18.013

中、美、欧、日药典机构和药品监管机构发布的相近内容通用技术要求的比较研究

Comparison of General Technical Requirements for Similar Content Published by Pharmacopoeia Agencies and Drug Regulatory Agencies in China,United States,Europe,and Japan

徐昕怡 1于文力 2李丹 3王冠男 4李衡 5王芸 6刘贞 7陶乐然 8宋皞昀 9杨昭鹏1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 国家药典委员会,北京 100061
  • 2. 欧加隆(上海)医药科技有限公司,上海200030
  • 3. 默沙东研发(中国)有限公司,北京 100012
  • 4. 拜尔医药保健有限公司,北京 100176
  • 5. 默克雪兰诺(北京)医药研发有限公司,北京 100016
  • 6. 中国外商投资企业协会药品研制和开发工作委员会,北京 100125
  • 7. 江西省药品检验检测研究院,南昌 330029
  • 8. 首都医科大学药学院,北京 100069
  • 9. 中国食品药品检定研究院,北京 102629
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 为完善我国药典机构和药品监管机构发布的相近内容指导原则(通用技术要求)的制定机制和收载内容提供参考借鉴.方法 通过梳理中国、美国、欧洲、日本药典机构和药品监管机构发布的内容相近的指导原则(通用技术要求),从制定目的、适用范围和具体内容的相同点、区别点、相互引用情况进行比较和分析.结果 在制剂、生物制品、稳定性、杂质、溶出度、微生物检测、分析方法验证等方面,中、美、欧、日药典机构和药品监管机构存在相近内容的指导原则(通用技术要求),在制定目的和侧重点上有所差异.除我国外,其他国家或地区药典机构和药品监管机构发布的相近内容指导原则(通用技术要求)中重复内容较少,没有相互冲突的内容,两者相互补充,共同支撑药品标准体系 结论 建议由我国药品监管机构牵头确定主题,进一步优化完善协调机制,根据各机构的职能,协调、统一药典机构和药品监管机构制定的指导原则(通用技术要求),确保两者在制定目的、适用范围和收载内容上定位清晰.加强两者的互操作性,并与国际标准保持同步.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To provide reference and guidance for improving the development mechanism and content of guidelines(general technical requirements)for similar content published by Chinese pharmacopoeia commission and drug regulatory agency.METHODS By reviewing the similar guidelines(general technical requirements)published by pharmacopoeia commissions and drug regu-latory agencies in China,the United States,Europe,and Japan,a comparison and analysis were conducted on their similarities,differences,and mutual references in terms of their development purposes,scope of application,and specific content.RESULTS In terms of prepara-tions,biological products,stability,impurities,dissolution,rmicrobiological testing methods,and validation of analytical methods,pharmaco-poeia commissions and drug regulatory agencies in China,the United States,Europe,and Japan have similar guidelines(general technical requirements),and there are differences in the purposes and focuses.Except for China,other countries or regions have less repetitive content and no conflicting content in the guidelines(general technical requirements)for similar content published by pharmacopoeia commissions and drug regulatory agencies.The two complement each other and jointly support the drug standard system.CONCLUSION It is recommended that China's drug regulatory agency take the lead in determining the subjects,further optimizing and improving the harmonization mechanism,and harmonizing and unifying the guidelines(general technical requirements)developed by pharmacopoeia commission and drug regulatory agency based on the functions of each agency,to ensure that the two are clearly positioned in terms of development purposes,scopeof application,and content.Strengthen the interoperability of similar content guidelines published by pharmacopoeia agency and drug regulatory agency and keep pace with international standards.

关键词

药典/监管/指导原则/通用技术要求/比较

Key words

pharmacopoeia/regulation/guideline/general technical requirement/comparison

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

中国药品监督管理研究会研究课题(2023-Y-Y-003)

出版年

2024
中国药学杂志
中国药学会

中国药学杂志

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.957
ISSN:1001-2494
参考文献量14
段落导航相关论文