首页|复方石淋通片质量评价方法研究

复方石淋通片质量评价方法研究

扫码查看
目的 建立复方石淋通片的质量评价方法。方法 色谱柱为Waters Sunfire C18 柱(200 mm×4。6 mm,5µm),流动相为乙腈-0。17%磷酸水溶液(梯度洗脱),流速为 0。9 mL/min,检测波长分别为 327 nm(绿原酸、咖啡酸),334 nm(夏佛塔苷、异夏佛塔苷),240 nm(芒果苷、马钱苷),柱温为 35℃,进样量为 10µL。以夏佛塔苷峰为参照峰,利用中药色谱指纹图谱相似度评价系统(2012A版)建立10 批样品的高效液相色谱(HPLC)指纹图谱,标定、指认共有峰,并进行相似度评价,并采用HPLC法测定 6 个成分的含量。采用聚类分析和主成分分析对 10 批样品进行质量评价。结果 共标定 21 个共有峰,指认出其中 6 个,分别为夏佛塔苷、异夏佛塔苷、绿原酸、咖啡酸、马钱苷、芒果苷;相似度为 0。979~0。996。上述 6 个成分质量浓度分别在 13。96~279。3µg/mL、5。468~109。4µg/mL、10。07~201。3 µg/mL、2。762~55。24 µg/mL、5。390~107。8 µg/mL、5。252~105。0 µg/mL 范围内与峰面积线性关系良好(r>0。999 0);精密度、稳定性、重复性试验结果的RSD均小于 2。0%;平均加样回收率分别为 100。00%,98。43%,99。91%,98。52%,99。35%,99。08%,RSD为 0。30%~1。14%(n = 6)。10 批样品中上述 6 个成分含量分别为 1。595~1。699 mg/g、0。5811~0。6024 mg/g、1。116~1。217 mg/g、0。299 4~0。310 5 mg/g、0。6022~0。6142 mg/g、0。6017~0。6245 mg/g。10批样品共聚为 3类,主成分 1-3是影响复方石淋通片质量评价的主要因子。结论 所建立的方法结果准确,重复性和稳定性好,特征性强,可用于复方石淋通片的质量控制。
Study of Quality Evaluation Medthod of Compound Shilintong Tablets
Objective To establish a quality evaluation method for Compound Shilintong Tablets.Methods The chromatographic column was Waters Sunfire C18 column(200 mm×4.6 mm,5 µm),the mobile phase was acetonitrile-0.17%phosphoric acid aqueous solution(gradient elution),the flow rate was 0.9 mL/min,the detection wavelengths were 327 nm(chlorogenic acid,caffeic acid),334 nm(schaftoside,isoschaftoside)and 240 nm(mangiferin,loganin),the column temperature was 35℃,and the injection volume was 10 µL.With the schaftoside peak as the reference,the Similarity Evaluation System for Chromatographic Fingerprints of Traditional Chinese Medicine(Version 2012A)was used to establish the high-performance liquid chromatography(HPLC)fingerprint for 10 batches of samples,the common peaks were marked and identified,the similarity evaluation was performed,and the contents of six components were determined by the HPLC method.Cluster analysis and principal component analysis were used to evaluate the quality of 10 batches of samples.Results A total of 21 common peaks were marked,of which six were identified as schaftoside,isoschaftoside,chlorogenic acid,caffeic acid,loganin and mangiferin,with the similarity of 0.979 to 0.996.The linear ranges of the above six components were 13.96-279.3 µg/mL,5.468-109.4 µg/mL,10.07-201.3 µg/mL,2.762-55.24 µg/mL,5.390-107.8 µg/mL,5.252-105.0 µg/mL(r>0.999 0)respectively.The RSDs of precision,stability and repeatability tests were all lower than 2.0%.The average recovery rates of the above six components were 100.00%,98.43%,99.91%,98.52%,99.35%,99.08%respectively,with the RSDs in the range of 0.30%to 1.14%(n = 6).The contents of the above six components in 10 batches of samples were in the range of 1.595 to 1.699 mg/g,0.581 1 to 0.602 4 mg/g,1.116 to 1.217 mg/g,0.299 4 to 0.310 5 mg/g,0.602 2 to 0.614 2 mg/g,0.601 7 to 0.624 5 mg/g respectively.Ten batches of samples were grouped into three categories,and the principal components one to three were the main factors affecting the quality of Compound Shilintong Tablets.Conclusion The established method is accurate,repeatable,stable and specific,which can be used for the quality control of Compound Shilintong Tablets.

Compound Shilintong TabletsHPLCfingerprintcontent determinationcluster analysisprincipal component analysisquality control

米振清、郭佩

展开 >

山东省泰安市食品药品检验检测研究院·山东省泰安市纤维检验所,山东 泰安 271099

复方石淋通片 高效液相色谱法 指纹图谱 含量测定 聚类分析 主成分分析 质量控制

2024

中国药业
重庆市食品药品监督管理局

中国药业

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.369
ISSN:1006-4931
年,卷(期):2024.33(4)
  • 11