首页|国家评价性抽验氟马西尼注射液质量分析

国家评价性抽验氟马西尼注射液质量分析

扫码查看
目的 分析 2021 年国家评价性抽验氟马西尼注射液的质量。方法 依据现行标准,对我国 31 个省(自治区、直辖市)11 家生产企业的 173 批氟马西尼注射液样品进行pH、杂质、含量测定等 10 项法定检验,从杂质A、渗透压、依地酸盐、微量元素、加速试验、长期试验、基于多指标数学建模的药物质量控制方面进行探索性研究,并对发现的问题进行分析。结果 173 批样品法定检验结果均为合格(100。00%),杂质A含量均不超过 0。3%;仅 1 家生产企业的所有批次样品渗透压过低(为 38 mOsmol/kg);30 批样品均加入依地酸盐,但含量差异较大;86 批样品中砷、锑、铅、镉的含量均低于 0。1 mg/L,不同生产企业的样品中铬和铜含量均低于 0。02 mg/L,且镁、锌、铅含量差异较大(分别为 0。002~0。067 mg/L、0。000 1~0。177 mg/L、0。000 2~0。044 mg/L);30 批样品(温度为 40℃,相对湿度为 100%)放置 1,3,5 个月后,杂质A与总杂质含量均呈稳步上升趋势,且氟马西尼含量不同程度下降。6 家生产企业的 24 批近效期样品中主要杂质为杂质A,其他最大单个杂质含量均低于 0。2%,杂质A和总杂质含量均不超过 1。0%。有 3 家生产企业样品的重点项目(pH、杂质含量、氟马西尼含量)综合检验结果呈较明显的相对聚集,有 3 家较分散。多数现行标准未对该药品中杂质A、渗透压、依地酸盐添加量等进行控制,包装材料多为低硼硅玻璃,部分生产企业的药品说明书标注不完善。结论 市售氟马西尼注射液质量总体良好,但仍需进一步提升;现行标准基本可行,但仍需提高和完善。
Quality Analysis of Flumazenil Injection in National Evaluation Inspection
Objective To analyze the quality of Flumazenil Injection in national evaluation inspection in 2021.Methods Based on the current standards,173 batches of Flumazenil Injection from 11 manufacturing enterprises in 31 provinces(autonomous regions,municipalities)in China were selected for 10 statutory inspections such as pH,impurity and content determination.Exploratory studies were conducted on the impurity A,osmotic pressure,edetate,trace element,accelerated test,long-term test and drug quality control based on multi-index mathematical model,and the problems found in the exploratory studies were analyzed.Results The results of statutory inspections of 173 batches of samples were all qualified(100.00%).The content of impurity A was not over 0.3%.Only one manufacturing enterprise had a low osmotic pressure(38 mOsmol/kg)for all batches of samples.Thirty batches of samples were all added in edetate,but there was a significant difference in content.The contents of arsenic,antimony,lead and cadmium in 86 batches of samples was all below 0.1 mg/L,the contents of chromium and copper in samples from different manufacturing enterprises were all below 0.02 mg/L,and there were significant differences in the contents of magnesium(0.002-0.067 mg/L),zinc(0.000 1-0.177 mg/L)and lead(0.000 2-0.044 mg/L)in samples from different manufacturing enterprises.After being placed at a temperature of 40℃and a relative humidity of 100%for one,three and five months,the impurity A and total impurities contents in 30 batches of samples showed a steady increase,while the content of flumazenil decreased to varying degrees.The main impurity in 24 batches of samples near to expiration date from six manufacturing enterprises was impurity A,the content of other biggest single impurity was below 0.2%,and the contents of impurity A and total impurities were not over 1.0%.The comprehensive inspection of the key items(pH,impurity content and flumazenil content)of samples from three manufacturing enterprises showed obvious relative aggregation,while that of samples from other three manufacturing enterprises were relatively dispersed.Impurity A,osmotic pressure and amount of edetate added in the drug were not controlled in most current standards,the packaging material was mostly low-borosilicate glass,and the labeling of drug instructions in some manufacturing enterprises were imperfect.Conclusion The overall quality of commercial Flumazenil Injection is good,but it still need to be improved,the current standards are basically feasible,but they still need to be perfected.

national evaluation inspectionFlumazenil Injectiondrug regulationquality analysis

吴秋云、陈民辉

展开 >

江苏省食品药品监督检验研究院,江苏 南京 210019

国家评价性抽验 氟马西尼注射液 药品监管 质量分析

2024

中国药业
重庆市食品药品监督管理局

中国药业

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.369
ISSN:1006-4931
年,卷(期):2024.33(4)
  • 11