首页|托法替布与巴瑞替尼治疗类风湿关节炎成本-效果比较分析

托法替布与巴瑞替尼治疗类风湿关节炎成本-效果比较分析

扫码查看
目的 比较托法替布与巴瑞替尼治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)的经济性.方法 基于我国卫生体系,获取巴瑞替尼与托法替布临床疗效头对头对比的真实世界研究数据,从四川省药械招标采购服务中心获得两种药品的价格,利用TreeAge Pro 2011 软件建立决策树模型,计算增量成本-效果比(ICER),并进行情境分析、单因素敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析,比较两药的经济性.结果 分别以临床缓解[临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)≤2.8 分]率或低疾病活动度(2.8 分<CDAI≤10 分,LDA)达成率为结局指标时,巴瑞替尼相比托法替布的ICER分别为 27574.21488,27125.85366.单因素敏感性分析,两药以缓解率为结局指标时,巴瑞替尼成本及巴瑞替尼缓解率对结果影响较大;以低疾病活动度达成率为结局指标时,巴瑞替尼成本及两药低疾病活动度达成率对结果影响较大.托法昔布的成本对结果影响不大.同时考虑原研药和仿制药(且两者临床疗效均达到缓解及低疾病活动度)时,ICER分别增至 67221.74,66128.70.概率敏感性分析中的成本-效果可接受曲线显示,每单位效果的意愿支付阈值(WTP)为 0 时,托法替布为 100%优势方案;以临床缓解率及低疾病活动度达成率为结局指标,WTP分别大于 28766 元及 24743 元时,巴瑞替尼为最优方案的概率更大.结论 判断托法替布与巴瑞替尼治疗RA的经济性时需结合不同结局指标及WTP.
Comparative Analysis on Cost-Effectiveness of Tofacitinib Versus Baricitinib in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Objective To compare the economy of tofacitinib versus baricitinib in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis(RA).Methods Based on China's healthcare system,the head to head real-world researches comparing the clinical efficacy of baricitinib versus tofacitinib were obtained,the prices of the two drugs were obtained from the website(https://www.scyxzbcg.cn),a decision tree model was constructed by the TreeAge Pro 2011 software,the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER)was calculated,the scenario analysis,one-way sensitivity analysis and probability sensitivity analysis were performed to compare the economy of two drugs.Results With clinical remission(clinical disease activity index(CDAI)≤2.8 points)rate or reaching rate of low disease activity(2.8 points<CDAI≤10 points,LDA)as the outcome indicator,the ICER of baricitinib compared to tofacitinib were 27574.21488 and 27125.85366,respectively.The one-way sensitivity analysis showed that the cost and remission rate of baricitinib had a significant effect on the outcomes with the remission rate of the two drugs as the outcome indicator;the cost of baricitinib and LDA reaching rate of the two drugs had a significant effect on the outcomes with the LDA reaching rate as the outcome indicator.The cost of tofacitinib had a little effect on the outcomes.When considering both the original-patented and the generic drugs(both tofacitinib and baricitinib reaching remission and LDA in clinical efficacy),the ICERs of baricitinib compared to tofacitinib were 67221.74 and 66128.70,respectively.The cost-effectiveness acceptable curve in probability sensitivity analysis showed that when the willingness to pay(WTP)per unit effect was 0,tofacitinib was optimal,with the cost-effectiveness probability of 100%;when the clinical remission rate and LDA reaching rate were taken as the outcome indicators,baricitinib was optimal,with the WTP per unit effect were greater than CNY 28766 and CNY 24743,respectively.Conclusion When comparing the economy of tofacitinib versus baricitinib in the treatment of RA,different outcome indicators and WTPs should be considered.

rheumatoid arthritisbaricitinibtofacitinibcost-effectiveness analysis

牟瑶、江龙洋、钟小燕、张成斌、李劲薇

展开 >

西南医科大学附属医院,四川 泸州 646000

类风湿关节炎 巴瑞替尼 托法替布 成本-效果分析

西南医科大学校级科研项目

2019ZQN083

2024

中国药业
重庆市食品药品监督管理局

中国药业

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.369
ISSN:1006-4931
年,卷(期):2024.33(16)
  • 2