首页|区域性临床学科建设评估指标体系构建与实证分析

区域性临床学科建设评估指标体系构建与实证分析

扫码查看
目的 构建适用于区域的临床医学科建设评估指标体系,为评价学科建设成效提供参考工具.方法 基于相关政策以及文献研究,应用德尔菲专家咨询法与层次分析法确定指标体系并赋予相应权重,运用构建的指标体系对深圳市某区10个临床学科进行实测分析,应用加权求和法计算各学科总分以及spearman等级相关分析验证评估结果有效性.结果 形成一套包括5项一级指标、16项二级指标以及54项三级指标在内的评估指标体系,并量化了各级指标权重.结论 所构建的区域性临床学科建设评估指标体系,专家咨询积极性、权威性与协调性较高;实证评估结果有一定区分度,且与专家评分排序结果高度相关,具有较高的可行性.
Construction and Demonstration of Evaluation Index System of Regional Clinical Medical Discipline Construction
Objective To establish a set of regional evaluation index system for clinical medicine disciplines,and to provide a reference tool for evaluating the effectiveness of its construction.Methods Based on relevant policies and literature research,Delphi expert consultation method and analytic hierarchy process were used to determine the index system and assign corresponding weights.The index system was used to conduct field analysis of 10 clinical disciplines in a district of Shenzhen,and the total score of each discipline was calculated by weighted summing method and spearman correlation analysis was used to verify the validity of the evaluation results.Results A set of evaluation index system including 5 first-level indicators,16 second-level indicators and 54 third-level indicators was formed and the weights of all levels of indicators were quantified,which could truly reflect the level of regional clinical discipline construction.Conclusion The established subject evaluation index system has high initiative,authority and coordination of expert consultation.The results of empirical evaluation have a certain degree of differentiation,and are highly correlated with the ranking results of experts,and have strong feasibility.

clinical disciplinediscipline constructiondiscipline evaluationindex system

陈萌萱、熊雪晨、吴萍、李鸿钰、罗力

展开 >

复旦大学公共卫生学院 上海 200032

临床学科 学科建设 学科评估 指标体系

教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目

20JZD027

2024

中国医院管理
中国医院管理杂志社

中国医院管理

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:2.15
ISSN:1001-5329
年,卷(期):2024.44(8)