中华中医药杂志2017,Vol.32Issue(5) :2043-2046.

论经方中的白术或为苍术

Rhizoma Atractylodis Macrocephalae in classical prescriptions might be Rhizoma Atractylodis

王强 林昌松
中华中医药杂志2017,Vol.32Issue(5) :2043-2046.

论经方中的白术或为苍术

Rhizoma Atractylodis Macrocephalae in classical prescriptions might be Rhizoma Atractylodis

王强 1林昌松2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 广州中医药大学第一临床医学院,广州510405
  • 2. 广州中医药大学第一附属医院,广州510405
  • 折叠

摘要

为了研究经方中只用白术而不用苍术这一现象,对经方中含白术的条文和白术、苍术源流进行了探究.发现张仲景原著中只术并无白术这一药名,宋以前医籍中的术多用苍术,以苍术解释经方也具有合理性.因此经方中的术为苍术具备一定的可能性和合理性.

Abstract

In order to find out the reason why Rhizoma Atractylodis Macrocephalae was used in classic prescriptions instead of Rhizoma Atractylodis,the origin of these two medicines was explored.It revealed that ZHANG Zhong-jing used the name of'zhu'instead of Rhizoma Atractylodis Macrocephalae in his original book.Rhizoma Atractylodis was widely appeared in medical books before Song dynasty.Therefore,there was a reasonable ground for Rhizoma Atractylodis to explain the classic prescriptions.Hence,it was possible and reasonable that the ‘zhu’ in classic prescriptions meant Rhizoma Atractylodis.

关键词

经方/白术/苍术

Key words

Classic prescriptions/Rhizoma Atractylodis Macrocephalae/Rhizoma Atractylodis

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2017
中华中医药杂志
中华中医药学会

中华中医药杂志

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.135
ISSN:1673-1727
被引量13
参考文献量3
段落导航相关论文