中华中医药杂志2024,Vol.39Issue(1) :78-81.

中医外科学术流派研究评述

Comment on the academic schools of traditional Chinese medicine surgery

王缙 罗婕 范天田 莫清莲 陈晓林
中华中医药杂志2024,Vol.39Issue(1) :78-81.

中医外科学术流派研究评述

Comment on the academic schools of traditional Chinese medicine surgery

王缙 1罗婕 1范天田 2莫清莲 1陈晓林1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 广西中医药大学,南宁 530200
  • 2. 中国中医科学院中国医史文献研究所,北京 100700
  • 折叠

摘要

传统的中医外科派别划分主要有三种,即三分法、五分法、九分法,略以三分法影响较大.随着地域性医学流派研究的发展,外科派别研究受到了来自地域角度的审视.但整体而言,中医外科学术流派的研究仍有诸多问题亟待解决.现有的外科派别划分方案中,涉及到的外科著作只有少数几种,这与现存的外科古籍数量极不相称.或许,从梳理古籍文献的角度来重新认识外科派别,会是一个可探索的方案.

Abstract

There are three traditional Chinese medicine surgical sects,i.e.the three-point method,the five-point method and the nine-point method,of which the slightly three-point method has a greater impact.With the development of regional medical school research,surgical school research has been examined from a regional perspective.However,there are still many problems to be solved.In the existing classification scheme of surgical factions,only a few surgical works are involved,which is extremely disproportionate to the number of existing surgical ancient books.Perhaps a new understanding of the surgical school from the perspective of reviewing ancient literature would be an exploratory approach.

关键词

中医外科学/学术流派/正宗派/全生派/心得派

Key words

Traditional Chinese medicine surgery/Academic schools/Zheng Zong School/Quan Sheng School/Xin De School

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFC1709200)

2019年四川省社会科学重点研究基地"中国出土医学文献与文物研究中心"项目(CTYX13)

出版年

2024
中华中医药杂志
中华中医药学会

中华中医药杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.135
ISSN:1673-1727
参考文献量26
段落导航相关论文