首页|盐酸羟考酮缓控释片治疗中重度癌痛的安全性和有效性系统评价

盐酸羟考酮缓控释片治疗中重度癌痛的安全性和有效性系统评价

扫码查看
目的:系统评价盐酸羟考酮缓控释片治疗中重度癌痛的有效性和安全性。方法:计算机检索PubMed、Web of Sci-ence、Embase、Cochrane Library、CBM、中国知网、VIP、万方等数据库,检索时限为建库至2023年3月25日。纳入盐酸羟考酮缓控释片(试验组)对比同类药物(对照组)用于治疗中重度癌痛的随机对照试验。采用Cochrane偏倚风险评价手册对纳入的文献进行质量评价,运用RevMan 5。3和Stata 17。0软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入70项RCT,共计6 449例患者。70篇文献按照对照组所用药物的不同,分组进行Meta分析。Meta分析结果显示,试验组患者的疼痛有效缓解率均显著高于对照组,盐酸曲马多缓释片[RR=1。12,95%CI(1。08,1。17),P<0。01]、硫酸吗啡缓控释片[RR=1。16,95%CI(1。12,1。20),P<0。01]、美沙酮片[RR=1。13,95%CI(1。03,1。25),P=0。01]、氨酚羟考酮片[RR=1。09,95%CI(1。01,1。19),P=0。03]。在药物安全性方面,试验组患者的便秘、恶心、呕吐、头晕等不良反应发生率低于对照组硫酸吗啡缓控释片(P<0。05),部分不良反应发生率(头晕、恶心及呼吸抑制)低于对照组氨酚羟考酮片(P<0。05),而与对照组盐酸曲马多缓释片和美沙酮片相比,不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论:盐酸羟考酮缓控释片镇痛效果相比同类药物盐酸曲马多缓释片、硫酸吗啡缓控释片、美沙酮片、氨酚羟考酮片具有明显优势,且不增加药物不良反应,安全性良好。
Systematic evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of oxycodone hydrochloride slow controlled release tablets for moderate-severe cancer pain
OBJECTIVE Systematic evaluation of the efficacy and safety of oxycodone hydrochloride extended release tablets for moderate-to-severe cancer pain.METHODS Computerized searches of the databases of PubMed,Web of Science,Embase,Cochrane Library,Chinese BioMedicine(CBM),CNKI,VIP and Wanfang were performed with a time limit of March 25,2023 from inceptions.Randomized controlled trials(RCTs)comparing oxycodone hydrochloride extended release tablets(test group)with similar drugs(control group)for moderate-to-severe cancer pain were included.Cochrane Handbook for the Evaluation of Risk of Bias was utilized for evaluating the quality of the included literature and Meta-analysis performed with RevMan 5.3 and Stata 17.0 software.RESULTS A total of 70 RCTs were retrieved with 6449 patients.Meta-analysis was performed according to the drugs used in control group.Meta-analysis revealed that effective pain relief rate of trial group was significantly higher than that of control group:tramadol hydrochloride extended-release tablets[RR=1.12,95%CI(1.08,1.17),P<0.01],morphine sulfate extended-release tablets[RR=1.16,95%CI(1.12,1.20),P<0.01],methadone tablets[RR=1.13,95%CI(1.03,1.25),P=0.01]and aminophenol oxycodone tablets.[RR=1.09,95%CI(1.01,1.19),P=0.03].In terms of drug safety,the incidence of constipation,nausea,vomiting and dizziness was lower in test group than that of morphine sulfate extended-release tablets in control group(P<0.05);the incidence of some adverse reactions(dizziness,nausea & respiratory depression)was lower than that of aminophenol oxycodone tablets in control group(P<0.05).Yet the difference in the incidence of adverse reac-tions as compared with tramadol hydrochloride extended-release tablets and methadone tablets in control group had no statistical significance(P>0.05).CONCLUSION Oxycodone hydrochloride extended-release tablets offers obvious advantages over simi-lar drugs tramadol hydrochloride extended-release tablets,morphine sulfate extended-release tablets,methadone tablets and amino phenol oxycodone tablets in terms of analgesia.Without a higher incidence of adverse reactions,it has a decent safety profile.

hydroxycodone hydrochloride sustained-release tabletscancer paineffective pain relief rateMeta-analysisMedication safety

张新宇、李丕宝、杨静、郑磊

展开 >

中国海洋大学医药学院,山东青岛 266003

山东省第一康复医院重症医学科,山东临沂 276034

山东省第三省立医院药学部,山东济南 250031

盐酸羟考酮缓控释片 癌痛 疼痛有效缓解率 Meta分析 用药安全

山东省自然科学基金面上项目山东省自然科学基金山东省医学会治疗药物监测科研专项济南市科技局临床医学技术创新计划山东省医药卫生项目

ZR2023MG064ZR2022MH250YXH2020ZX047202134016202213010928

2024

中国医院药学杂志
中国药学会

中国医院药学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.198
ISSN:1001-5213
年,卷(期):2024.44(8)
  • 16