首页|低分子肝素防治肿瘤相关静脉血栓栓塞症的出血风险因素分析

低分子肝素防治肿瘤相关静脉血栓栓塞症的出血风险因素分析

扫码查看
目的:调查肿瘤患者使用低分子肝素防治静脉血栓栓塞症(venous thromboembolism,VTE)的相关出血风险,为个体化评估肿瘤患者使用低分子肝素防治静脉血栓疾病提供帮助。方法:采用单中心、回顾性观察性队列研究方法,选择2021年1-12月资阳市第一人民医院住院的肿瘤患者为观察对象,纳入其中年龄≥18岁并使用低分子肝素防治VTE的患者731例,按照临床结局是否发生出血事件分为出血组和未出血组。观察两组间性别、年龄、肿瘤分类、体质量等对出血风险的影响。结果:单因素分析显示:出血组患者体质量低于未出血组(P=0。009);出血组使用非甾体类抗炎药占比高于未出血组(P<0。01);出血组低分子肝素日剂量高于未出血组(P<0。01);出血组内生肌酐清除率(Ccr)低于未出血组(P<0。01);出血组血小板计数(PLT)低于未出血组(P=0。011);出血组凝血酶原时间(PT)低于未出血组(P=0。006);两组患者Padua评分和HAS-BLED出血风险评分差异均有统计学意义(P<0。01)。两组患者在性别、年龄、肿瘤分类、低分子肝素用药持续时间、活化部分凝血酶时间(APTT)、血浆纤维蛋白原(FIB)及基础疾病状态方面差异均无统计学意义(P>0。05)。 logistic回归分析显示:非甾体类抗炎药、HAS-BLED出血风险评分、低分子肝素使用量、PT4个变量被纳入模型,模型整体评价采用Omnibus检验,x2=48。124,P<0。01。PLT与出血事件存在非线性关系,故未被纳入多因素回归分析。ROC曲线评估纳入模型的4个变量预测相关出血事件能力并不理想,ROC-AUC均<0。850。结论:体质量、非甾体类抗炎药、低分子肝素使用量、PT、Ccr、血小板计数、Padua评分、HAS-BLED出血风险评分可能是肿瘤患者使用低分子肝素防治VTE的出血危险因素。非甾体类抗炎药、HAS-BLED出血风险评分、低分子肝素使用量、PT可能是预测相关患者出血风险的独立危险因素,但其预测能力并不理想。
Analysis of bleeding risk factors of low molecular weight heparin in prevention and treatment of tumor-associated venous thromboembolism
OBJECTIVE To explore the risks of bleeding associated with dosing of low molecular weight heparin(LMWH)for managing pulmonary thromboembolism(VTE)and provide assistance for individualized dosing of LMWH in the management of deep venous thrombosis(DVT)in cancer patients.METHODS A single-center,retrospective observational cohort study method was used to select tumor patients hospitalized in the First People's Hospital of Ziyang City from January to December 2021 as the observation objects,and 731 patients aged ≥18 years old and using low molecular weight heparin to prevent and treat VTE were included.According to whetherr bleeding events occurred in clinical outcomes,they were divided into bleeding group and non-bleeding group.The effects of demographic characteristics,basic disease status,coagulation function,platelet count and other factors on the risk of bleeding in tumor patients were observed.RESULTS Univariate analysis revealed that body weight was lower in bleeding group than that in non-bleeding group(P=0.009).The proportion of takers of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs(NSAIDs)was higher in bleeding group than that in non-bleeding group(P<0.01).Daily use of LMWH was higher in bleeding group than that in non-bleeding group(P<0.01).Creatinine clearance rate(Ccr)was lower in bleeding group than that in non-bleeding group(P<0.01).Platelet count(PLT)was lower in bleeding group than that in non-bleeding group(P=0.011).Prothrombin time(PT)was lower in bleeding group than that in non-bleeding group(P=0.006).Significant inter-group differences existed in Padua score and bleeding risk score of HAS-BLED(all P<0.01).No significant inter-group differences existed in gender,age,tumor classification,duration of LMWH,activated partial thromboplastin time(APTT),fibrinogen(FIB)or basic disease status(all P>0.05).Binary Logistic regression analysis indicated that NSAIDs(P=0.019),HAS-BLED(P<0.01),LMWH dosing(P=0.021)and PT(P=0.029)were included for modeling.The overall evaluation of the model was Omnibus test(x2=48.124,P<0.01).A non-linear relationship existed between PLT and bleeding events.Thus PLT was not included for multivariate regression analysis.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was not ideal for evalu-ating the capability of four variables in predicting related bleeding events.ROC-AUC was<0.850.CONCLUSION Body weight,NSAIDs,LMWH dosing,PT,Ccr,PLT,Padua score and HAS-BLED may be the risk factors for bleeding in cancer patients on a therapy of LMWH for managing VTE.NSAIDs,HAS-BLED,LMWH dosing and PT may be independent risk factors for predicting bleeding risk in related patients.However,their predictive capabilities are not ideal.

venous thromboembolismlow molecular weight heparintumorbleeding risk

张子雨、周后凤、张惠玲、任常谕、廖兰凯

展开 >

成都市第五人民医院药剂科,四川成都 611100

资阳市第一人民医院肿瘤科,四川资阳 641300

成都市第五人民医院急诊科,四川成都 611100

静脉血栓栓塞症 低分子肝素 肿瘤 出血风险

四川省医院协会青年药师科研专项四川省卫生健康委医学科技项目

2202321PJ149

2024

中国医院药学杂志
中国药学会

中国医院药学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.198
ISSN:1001-5213
年,卷(期):2024.44(11)
  • 17