首页|新型口服小分子抗新型冠状病毒感染药物的快速遴选评价实践

新型口服小分子抗新型冠状病毒感染药物的快速遴选评价实践

扫码查看
目的:应用《中国医疗机构药品评价与遴选快速指南(第二版)》(以下简称"指南")对新型口服小分子抗新型冠状病毒感染(COVID-19)药物进行快速遴选评价,为医疗机构合理引进药物提供参考。方法:基于指南制定的百分制评估体系,参照药品说明书、疾病诊治指南,并检索中国知网、万方数据库、PubMed等数据库中的文献,从药学特性、有效性、安全性、经济性、其他属性5个方面对奈玛特韦片/利托那韦片、莫诺拉韦胶囊、阿兹夫定片进行卫生技术评估,并依据评分结果推荐各种药品的引进级别。结果:经量化评分,阿兹夫定片、奈玛特韦片/利托那韦片和莫诺拉韦胶囊的最终得分分别为75。00、71。78和73。36分。上述3药均为早期治疗轻、中型COVID-19患者的一线药物。阿兹夫定片适用人群更广泛,价格便宜,但腹泻、头晕等不良反应发生率略高。奈玛特韦片/利托那韦片、莫诺拉韦胶囊仅限于有发展为重型风险因素的成人患者使用,奈玛特韦片/利托那韦片的疗效优于莫诺拉韦胶囊,但不良药物相互作用较多,且价格昂贵。莫诺拉韦胶囊用于肝肾功异常患者时无需调整剂量,无不良药物相互作用,轻中度不良反应发生率最低。上述3药的总分均>70分,属强推荐范畴,医疗机构可根据用药群体特点酌情选择1~2种引进。结论:本次卫生技术评估可为医疗机构开展药品遴选评价提供实践经验,同时为临床合理使用抗COVID-19药物提供循证依据。
Practice of Rapid Selection and Evaluation of New Oral Small-Molecule Anti-COVID-19 Drugs
OBJECTIVE:To perform rapid selection and evaluation of new oral small-molecule anti-COVID-19 drugs based on Rapid Guidelines for Drug Evaluation and Selection in Chinese Medical Institutions(Second Edition)(hereinafter referred to as"the guidelines"),so as to provide reference for the rational introduction of drugs by medical institutions.METHODS:By referring to drug instructions,disease diagnosis and treatment guidelines,and through retrieving literature from databases such as CNKI,Wanfang Data and PubMed,a percentile evaluation system based on guidelines was developed to evaluate the hygiene technology of Nematovir/Litonavir tablets,Monovir capsules,and Azvudine tablets from five aspects:pharmaceutical characteristics,efficacy,safety,economy,and other attributes.According to the score results,the introduction level of various drugs was recommended.RESULTS:After quantitative evaluation,the final scores of Azvudine tablets,Nematoveir/Litonavir tablets,and Monovir capsules were respectively 75.00,71.78 and 73.36 points.All three were first-line drugs for early treatment of mild and medium-COVID-19 patients.Azulfidine tablets were more widely available and cheaper,but had a slightly higher incidence of adverse drug reactions such as diarrhea and dizziness.Nematrevir/Ritonavir tablets and Monovir capsules were restricted to adults with risk factors for developing a heavy form of the disease,and Nematrevir/Ritonavir tablets were more efficacious than Monovir capsules,but had more adverse drug interactions and were expensive.Monoravir capsules did not require dose adjustment when used in patients with abnormal hepatic or renal function,with no adverse drug interactions,and had the lowest incidence of mild to moderate adverse drug reactions.The total score of the three drugs was>70 points,which belonged to the category of strong recommendation.Medical institutions could choose 1 to 2 types of introduction according to the characteristics of the medication population.CONCLUSIONS:This health technology assessment can provide practical experience for medical institutions to carry out drug selection and evaluation,as well as evidence-based evidence for rational clinical use of anti-COVID-19 drugs.

Health technology assessmentDrug selectionNematavir/Ritonavir tabletsMonoravir capsulesAzifudine tablets

刘洪涛、连玉菲、方灵芝、邱学佳、张玥

展开 >

河北医科大学第一医院药剂科,石家庄 050000

河北省人民医院药学部,石家庄 050051

卫生技术评估 药品遴选 奈玛特韦片/利托那韦片 莫诺拉韦胶囊 阿兹夫定片

河北省医学科学研究重点课题计划

20241960

2024

中国医院用药评价与分析
中国医药生物技术协会,中国药房杂志社

中国医院用药评价与分析

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.142
ISSN:1672-2124
年,卷(期):2024.24(1)
  • 21