中国医院用药评价与分析2024,Vol.24Issue(2) :242-245,251.DOI:10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2024.02.025

依达拉奉右莰醇与神经节苷脂改善急性脑梗死神经功能的间接比较Meta分析

Meta-Analysis on Indirect Comparison Between Edaravone Dexborneol and Ganglioside in Improving Neurological Function in Acute Cerebral Infarction

周梦 张卫芳 张赟 吴方红 祝田田
中国医院用药评价与分析2024,Vol.24Issue(2) :242-245,251.DOI:10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2024.02.025

依达拉奉右莰醇与神经节苷脂改善急性脑梗死神经功能的间接比较Meta分析

Meta-Analysis on Indirect Comparison Between Edaravone Dexborneol and Ganglioside in Improving Neurological Function in Acute Cerebral Infarction

周梦 1张卫芳 2张赟 3吴方红 3祝田田4
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 新乡医学院药学院,河南 新乡 453003;安阳市人民医院药学部,河南 安阳 455000
  • 2. 南昌大学第二附属医院药学部, 南昌 330006
  • 3. 安阳市人民医院药学部,河南 安阳 455000
  • 4. 新乡医学院药学院,河南 新乡 453003
  • 折叠

摘要

目的:比较依达拉奉右莰醇与神经节苷脂对于急性脑梗死患者神经功能的改善效果.方法:检索PubMed、the Cochrane Library、Embase、中国知网、维普数据库、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献服务系统中建库至 2021 年 12 月的临床随机对照试验(观察组干预措施为基础治疗加依达拉奉右莰醇或神经节苷脂,对照组为基础治疗加依达拉奉),采用系统评价的方法对符合纳入标准的研究进行质量评估,采用RevMan 5.4软件对研究结局指标进行直接Meta分析,并利用间接比较法比较依达拉奉右莰醇与神经节苷脂改善急性脑梗死神经功能疗效的差异.结果:纳入7篇研究,共1 741例患者.直接Meta分析结果显示,神经节苷脂、依达拉奉右莰醇改善急性脑梗死患者美国国立卫生研究院脑卒中量表(NIHSS)评分的效果均优于依达拉奉,差异均有统计学意义(依达拉奉右莰醇 vs.依达拉奉:MD=-0.36,95%CI=-0.66~-0.07,P=0.02;神经节苷脂 vs.依达拉奉:MD=-0.85,95%CI=-1.51~-0.20,P=0.001);在改善Barther指数方面,差异均无统计学意义(依达拉奉右莰醇 vs.依达拉奉:RR= 1.44,95%CI= 0.70~3.00,P=0.32;神经节苷脂 vs.依达拉奉:MD=3.73,95%CI=-3.80~11.27,P=0.33).通过间接比较得知,依达拉奉右莰醇与神经节苷脂改善急性脑梗死患者NIHSS评分的效果比较,差异无统计学意义(MD=-0.324 5,95%CI=-1.203 2~0.618 2,P>0.05).安全性方面,2 项依达拉奉右莰醇相关研究报告治疗过程中出现了严重不良事件,依达拉奉右莰醇与依达拉奉的严重不良事件发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(RR=1.48,95%CI=0.53~4.17,P=0.45);其余研究未发生严重不良事件.结论:目前,有限的证据表明依达拉奉右莰醇与神经节苷脂对于急性脑梗死患者的神经功能均有较好的改善效果,二者差异不显著.但因纳入的研究数量少以及质量不高,故全面评估二者差异尚需更多高质量的直接比较研究.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:To compare the improvement effect of edaravone dexborneol and ganglioside in improving neurological function in acute ischemic stroke.METHODS:Clinical randomized controlled trials(the observation group was intervened by basic treatment combined with edaravone dexborneol or ganglioside,the control group was given basic treatment combined with edaravone)were retrieved from PubMed,the Cochrane Library,Embase,CNKI,VIP,Wanfang Data,SinoMed from base-building to Dec.2021,systematic review was used to conduct quality assessment on studies met the inclusion criteria,RevMan 5.4 software was used to perform Meta-analysis on the outcome indicators of the studies,indirect comparison method was used to compare the differences in efficacy of improving neurological function in acute cerebral infarction between edaravone dexborneol and ganglioside.RESULTS:A total of 7 studies were enrolled,including 1 741 patients.Results of direct Meta-analysis indicated that both ganglioside and edaravone dexborneol had better effect in improving National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS)scores than that of edaravone,with statistically significant differences(edaravone dexborneol vs.edaravone:MD=-0.36,95%CI=-0.66--0.07,P=0.02;ganglioside vs.edaravone:MD=-0.85,95%CI=-1.51--0.20,P= 0.001);in terms of improving Barther index,the differences were not statistically significant(edaravone dexborneol vs.edaravone:RR=1.44,95%CI=0.70-3.00,P=0.32;ganglioside vs.edaravone:MD=3.73,95%CI=-3.80-11.27,P=0.33).By indirect comparison,it was known that the difference in the effect of improving NIHSS scores in patients with acute cerebral infarction between edaravone dexborneol and gangliosides was not statistically significant(MD=-0.324 5,95%CI=-1.203 2-0.618 2,P>0.05).In terms of safety,two edaravone dexborneol-related studies reported severe adverse events during treatment,and the difference in the incidence of severe adverse events between edaravone dexborneol and edaravone was not statistically significant(RR=1.48,95%CI=0.53-4.17,P=0.45);no severe adverse events occurred in the rest studies.CONCLUSIONS:At present,limited evidence suggests that both edaravone dexborneol and ganglioside have better effects in improving neurological function in patients with acute cerebral infarction,and the difference between them is not significant.However,due to the small number of enrolled studies and the low quality,more high-quality direct comparative studies are needed to comprehensively assess the differences.

关键词

急性脑梗死/依达拉奉右莰醇/神经节苷脂/间接比较/Meta分析

Key words

Acute cerebral infarction/Edaravone dexborneol/Ganglioside/Indirect comparison/Meta-analysis

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
中国医院用药评价与分析
中国医药生物技术协会,中国药房杂志社

中国医院用药评价与分析

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.142
ISSN:1672-2124
参考文献量17
段落导航相关论文