首页|他汀类药物仿制药与原研药的疗效和安全性比较的系统评价

他汀类药物仿制药与原研药的疗效和安全性比较的系统评价

扫码查看
目的:系统评价他汀类药物仿制药与原研药在真实世界中的疗效和安全性,为临床用药选择提供循证依据。方法:计算机检索the Cochrane Library、MEDLINE、Embase、中国知网、中国生物医学文献服务系统、维普数据库和万方数据库,并查阅所获文献所附参考文献,收集他汀类药物仿制药与原研药的观察性研究(暴露组患者使用他汀类药物仿制药或原研药换为仿制药;非暴露组患者使用他汀类药物原研药),检索时限均为数据库建库至 2023 年 7 月。对符合纳入标准的研究进行资料提取后,采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行质量评价;运用RevMan 5。4 统计软件进行 Meta分析,同时进行描述性分析。结果:共纳入 14 项研究,其中3 项为历史对照研究,11 项为队列研究。Meta分析结果显示,仿制药与原研药总体主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率的差异无统计学意义(HR=1。07,95%CI=0。98~1。18,P=0。14),但氟伐他汀亚组分析结果提示仿制药的总体MACE发生率显著高于原研药;仿制药的总体全因死亡率显著高于原研药,但随访期为 12 个月的亚组分析结果显示差异无统计学意义(P>0。05);两组患者脑卒中住院率、不良反应发生率的差异均无统计学意义(P>0。05)。"换药"研究设计的定性描述结果表明,2 项回顾性队列研究中,原研药换为仿制药组患者的总胆固醇、三酰甘油、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平降低程度与未换药组的差异无统计学意义(P>0。05);3 项历史对照研究中,将原研药转换为仿制药并不会降低患者的疗效,然而原研药升高高密度脂蛋白胆固醇的效果显著优于仿制药。结论:他汀类药物的仿制药与原研药在临床疗效和安全性方面未见明显差异。
Systematic Review on Efficacy and Safety of Generic and Original Statins
OBJECTIVE:To systematically evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of generic and original statins,so as to provide evidence-based reference for clinical drug selection.METHODS:The Cochrane Library,MEDLINE,Embase,CNKI,SinoMed,VIP,and Wanfang Data were retrieved to collect observational studies on generic and original statins(the exposed group were treated with generic statins or replaced with generic drugs,the non-exposed group received original statins)from the establishment of the database to Jul.2023.And references attached to the obtained studies were consulted.After data extraction for studies that met the inclusion criteria,quality was evaluated by using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.RevMan 5.4 statistical software was used for Meta-analysis and descriptive analysis.RESULTS:A total of 14 studies were enrolled,including 3 historical control studies and 11 cohort studies.Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the overall incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE)between the generic and original drugs(HR=1.07,95%CI=0.98-1.18,P=0.14),yet the fluvastatin subgroup showed that the overall incidence of MACE of generic drugs was significantly higher than that of the original drugs.Overall all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the generic drug group than in the original drug group,yet the difference was not statistically significant in subgroups with a follow-up period of 12 months(P>0.05).There were no significant differences in stroke hospitalization rate and incidence of adverse drug reactions between two groups(P>0.05).Qualitative description of"drug replacement"study design showed that in two retrospective cohort studies,there was no statistical significance in reduction of total cholesterol,triacylglycerol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the group of patients who changed from original drugs to generic drugs compared with the group who did not change drugs(P>0.05).In three historical controlled studies,changing the original drugs to generic drugs did not decrease efficacy,yet the original drugs were more effective than the generic drugs in raising HDL cholesterol.CONCLUSIONS:There is no significant difference in clinical efficacy and safety between generic statins and original statins.

StatinsGeneric drugsOriginal drugsEfficacySafetySystematic review

邢晓璇、王可、张晓彤、王之舟、冯英楠、张兰、董宪喆

展开 >

首都医科大学宣武医院药剂科,北京 100053

他汀类药物 仿制药 原研药 有效性 安全性 系统评价

首都卫生发展科研专项北京市医院管理中心"登峰"计划中国科协科技智库青年人才计划

首发2024-2-2019DFL2019080320220615ZZ07110070

2024

中国医院用药评价与分析
中国医药生物技术协会,中国药房杂志社

中国医院用药评价与分析

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.142
ISSN:1672-2124
年,卷(期):2024.24(5)
  • 31