中国语言战略2024,Vol.11Issue(2) :113-123.

美国香会演讲中WE关系身份的元语用研究

A Meta-pragmatic Study of WE as Relational Identity in the US'SLD Speeches

卓丽
中国语言战略2024,Vol.11Issue(2) :113-123.

美国香会演讲中WE关系身份的元语用研究

A Meta-pragmatic Study of WE as Relational Identity in the US'SLD Speeches

卓丽1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 福州大学 外国语学院 福建 福州 350108;北京外国语大学 英语学院 北京 100089
  • 折叠

摘要

英语中的WE具有构建亲密关系身份、拉近距离增进群体凝聚力的语用功能.本研究借用国家话语元语用立场分析框架的立场定位,对美国香格里拉对话峰会的演讲语料(2014-2023)中WE所构建的群体关系身份进行考察,揭示WE作为元语用策略如何参与立场构建.研究发现,美国香会演讲中的WE不仅指代日韩菲澳泰等军事同盟国,还指代印度、越南等友好关系国,一些语境中还包含中国和俄罗斯(甚至朝鲜).美国使用WE与不同国家构建的群体关系身份具有动态性和迷惑性,它是国家话语立场的出发点,也为其在不同议题中争取国家利益提供相应理据.本文对WE的阐释有助于更好地理解美国国家话语的元语用策略,避免受其误导和欺骗.

Abstract

The pragmatic function of WE is manifested in constructing intimate relational identity,narrowing the distance,and enhancing group cohesion.This paper,based on the national discourse meta-pragmatic stance framework,analyzes WE as relational identity in the speeches delivered by US Defense Secretary at the Shangri-La Dialogue Summit(2014-2023)to reveal how"WE"serves as a meta-pragmatic strategy in stance construction.It's found that WE is used primarily to mean military allies(Japan,South Korea,Philippines,Thailand and Australia);it also refers to new partners(India,Indonesia,Myanmar and Vietnam)and com-petitors(China,Russia and even DPRK).The relational identities constructed by U.S.with WE are dynamic and deceptive ones that work as the starting points of its national discourse stance and the supporting argu-ments to achieve its national interests in different issues.This paper,by illustrating the US's meta-pragmatic application of WE,reminds us of its misleading or deceptive function.

关键词

WE/关系身份/国家话语/香格里拉对话峰会

Key words

WE/relational identity/national discourse/Shangri-La Dialogue

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
中国语言战略

中国语言战略

ISSN:
段落导航相关论文