劳动关系中言论纠纷的宪法适用:一个反思的视角
姜峰1
作者信息
摘要
一项法定权利所蕴含的价值和规范标准,应依据其涉及的特定法律关系来界定.宪法上的言论自由因具有公共性、脆弱性而应受到刚性保护,而劳动者的言论一般并非宪法言论自由在劳动关系中的具体化,也不适用刚性标准.对我国司法判例的实证考察表明,法官在劳动者言论纠纷裁判中对宪法的援引主要是修辞性的,纠纷解决最终依赖的,是不成文的劳动者"忠诚义务"和对冲突利益的个案权衡.这既反映了劳动关系的人身性、持续性特征对双方权利义务的重要影响,也说明纠纷完全可以在劳动法框架内解决.
Abstract
The value and norm specified in a legal right should be defined according to related particular legal relation.Constitutional freedom of expression should be rigidly protected because of its public nature and vulnerability,whereas workers'speech is generally not a concrete manifestation of constitutional freedom of speech in labor relations,and not subject to rigid standards either.Chinese judges'invocation of the Constitution in adjudicating disputes over workers'speech is largely rhetorical,and the key factor they take into account is whether the employees break their duty of loyalty to their employers.Therefore,this practice reflects the personal and continuous characteristics of labor relations on the rights and obligations of both parties.The disputes relating workplace speech can be handled by the ordinary labor laws as well.
关键词
劳动者言论/言论自由/基本权利/忠实义务Key words
workplace speech/freedom of speech/fundamental rights/duty of loyalty引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据