首页|复合加压内固定系统与空心钉治疗中青年股骨颈骨折疗效比较

复合加压内固定系统与空心钉治疗中青年股骨颈骨折疗效比较

扫码查看
目的:比较复合加压内固定系统(CCS)与空心螺钉治疗中青年股骨颈骨折临床效果.方法:回顾性分析2020年1月至2022年5月治疗的中青年股骨颈骨折患者的临床资料,依据内固定方式不同将患者分为空心螺钉组和复合加压内固定系统组(CCS组).两组患者的基线资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),比较两组患者术中复位方式、Garden指数、手术时间、术中出血量、术中透视次数、住院期间并发症发生情况、部分负重时间、完全负重时间、骨折愈合时间、髋关节Harris评分、骨折不愈合及股骨头坏死发生率.结果:两组患者术中复位方式、Garden指数、手术时间、术中出血量、术中透视次数、住院期间并发症发生情况等数据差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).复合加压内固定系统组患者开始部分负重时间、开始完全负重时间、骨折愈合时间显著短于空心螺钉组患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).复合加压内固定系统组患者术后3个月及末次随访Harris评分显著高于空心螺钉组患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).空心螺钉组与复合加压内固定系统组患者骨折不愈合及股骨头坏死总发生率分别为21.2%和20.0%,差异无统计学意义(x2=0.013,P=0.588).结论:复合加压内固定系统与空心螺钉均可作为中青年股骨颈骨折的有效内固定方式,相比于空心螺钉,复合加压内固定系统可缩短骨折愈合时间及开始负重时间,更有利于髋关节功能恢复.
Comparison of Combined Pressure Internal Fixation System and Hollow Nail in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture in Young and Middle-Aged Patients
Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of combined pressure internal fixation system(CCS)and hollow screw in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients.Methods:Clinical data of young and middle-aged patients with femoral neck fracture treated from January 2020 to May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed,and the patients were divided into hollow screw group and CCS group according to different internal fixation methods.There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups.Intraoperative reduction mode,Garden index,opera-tion time,intraoperative blood loss,intraoperative fluoroscopy times,incidence of complications during hospitalization,par-tial weight bearing time,complete weight bearing time,fracture healing time,Harris score of hip joint,fracture nonunion and incidence of femoral head necrosis were compared between the two groups.Results:There were no statistically signifi-cant differences in intraoperative reduction mode,Garden index,operation time,intraoperative blood loss,intraoperative fluoroscopy times,and complications during hospitalization between the two groups(P>0.05).The partial weight bearing time,complete weight bearing time and fracture healing time in CCS group were significantly shorter than those in hollow screw group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The Harris score of CCS group was significantly higher than that of hollow-scrcw group at 3 months and the last follow-up,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The total incidence of fracture nonunion and femoral head necrosis was 21.2%and 20.0%in the hollow screw group and CCS group,respectively,with no significant difference(x2=0.013,P=0.588).Conclusion:Both CCS and hollow screw can be used as effective internal fixation meth-ods for middle-aged and young femoral neck fractures.Compared with hollow screw,CCS can shorten the fracture healing time and weight-bearing time,and is more conducive to the functional recovery of hip joint.

femoral neck fractureyoung and middle-aged patientshollow screwcompound pressure internal fixation system

王祥金、魏巍

展开 >

徐州市中心医院(江苏 徐州,221009)

股骨颈骨折 中青年 空心螺钉 复合加压内固定系统

2024

中国中医骨伤科杂志
中华中医药学会,湖北省中医药研究院

中国中医骨伤科杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.732
ISSN:1005-0205
年,卷(期):2024.32(5)
  • 16