首页|免疫缺陷并发重症肺炎患者中医证型分布及预后危险因素研究

免疫缺陷并发重症肺炎患者中医证型分布及预后危险因素研究

扫码查看
目的 探讨入住ICU的免疫缺陷并发重症肺炎患者的中医证型分布、临床特征及预后危险因素.方法 采取回顾性分析方法,纳入2021年1月至2022年12月在广东省中医院ICU住院,且符合免疫缺陷标准的重症肺炎患者,根据第28天结局状态分为生存组和死亡组.比较两组患者的一般信息、中医证型、病原学及相关辅助检查指标,分析两组间的指标差异及与28 d预后危险因素.结果 1)104例患者的28 d死亡率为55.8%,两组患者的一般信息比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);2)104例患者的中医证型分布按频次从高到低排序依次为痰热壅肺证32例(30.8%),痰浊阻肺证32例(30.8%),邪陷正脱证25例(24.0%),热陷心包证15例(14.4%),两组患者的中医证型分布差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);3)104例患者的病原学结果示,细菌感染有67例(64.4%),真菌感染有34例(32.7%),病毒感染有13例(12.5%);4)死亡组患者的有创机械通气率、急性生理与慢性健康评分系统Ⅱ(APACHE Ⅱ)评分、SOFA评分、乳酸(Lac)、谷丙转氨酶(ALT)、谷草转氨酶(AST)、总胆红素(TBIL)、尿素(Urea)、凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(A PTT)、D-二聚体(DDi)、纤维蛋白(原)降解产物(FDP)高于生存组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);5)多因素Logistic回归分析显示,APAHCE Ⅱ评分和APTT对28 d预后具有统计学意义.结论 免疫缺陷并发重症肺炎患者28 d死亡率达55.8%;中医辨证分型以痰热壅肺证和痰浊阻肺证居多,但各证型预后无明显差异,需注意患者证型的动态演变;检出病原体种类数量较多,建议早期行全面微生物检查以指导抗感染治疗;APACHE Ⅱ评分和APTT可作为预测患者预后的指标.
Study on Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome Types and Prognostic Risk Factors of Patients with Severe Pneumonia Complicated with Immune Deficiency
Objective:To explore the distribution of TCM syndromes,clinical features and prognostic risk fac-tors in patients with immune deficiency complicated with severe pneumonia admitted to ICU.Methods:Retrospec-tive analysis was performed to include patients with severe pneumonia who were hospitalized in the ICU of Guang-dong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2021 to December 2022 and met the criteria of im-mune deficiency.According to the outcome status on the 28th day of inclusion,they were divided into the survival group and death group.The general information,TCM syndrome type,etiology and related auxiliary examination in-dexes of the two groups were compared.The difference between the two groups and the risk factors associated with the 28 day prognosis were analyzed.Results:l)The 28-day mortality rate of 104 patients was 55.8%,and there was no significant difference in the general information between the two groups(P>0.05).2)The distribution of TCM syndrome types in the 104 patients in order from high to low frequency was 32 cases(30.8%)of phlegm-heat obstructing lung,32 cases(30.8%)of phlegm-turbidity obstructing lung,25 cases(24.0%)of interior invasion of pathogen and vital qi collapse,and 15 cases(14.4%)of invasion of pericardium by heat.There was no statisti-cal significance in the distribution of TCM syndrome types between the two groups(P>0.05).3)Among the 104 patients,67 cases(64.4%)were infected with bacteria,34 cases(32.7%)were infected with fungi,and 13 cases(12.5%)were infected with viruses.4)The invasive mechanical ventilation rate,APACHE Ⅱ score,SOFA score,Lac,ALT,AST,TBIL,Urea,PT,APTT,DDi and FDP of patients in the death group were higher than those in the survival group,with statistical significance(P<0.05).5)Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that AP-AHCE Ⅱ score and APTT had statistical significance for 28 day prognosis.Conclusion:The 28-day mortality rate of patients with immune deficiency complicated with severe pneumonia in ICU was 55.8%.Phlegm-heat ob-structing lung syndrome and phlegm-turbidity obstructing lung syndrome were the most common in TCM syndrome differentiation,and there were a large number of pulmonary pathogens detected.APACHE Ⅱ score and APTT could be used as prognoses for patients.

Immune deficiencySevere pneumoniaTCM syndrome typeEtiologyPrognostic risk factors

严文金、曹旺梅、范荣荣、周耿标、韩云

展开 >

广州中医药大学,广东 广州 510030

广州中医药大学第二附属医院,广东 广州 510030

广东省中医院晁恩祥学术经验传承工作室,广东广州 510145

免疫缺陷 重症肺炎 中医证型 病原学 预后危险因素

国家自然科学基金广东省中医院朝阳人才科研专项

82104610ZY2022YL30

2024

中国中医急症
中华中医药学会

中国中医急症

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.144
ISSN:1004-745X
年,卷(期):2024.33(3)
  • 16