首页|"运目操"对老视干预作用的临床观察

"运目操"对老视干预作用的临床观察

扫码查看
目的 观察"运目操"对老视的干预作用.方法 纳入2021年3月—2021年10月于中国中医科学院眼科医院就诊的老视患者61例(61只眼),随机分为治疗组30例(30只眼)和对照组31例(31只眼).分别予"运目操"疗法和健康宣教.2组均观察8周.分别于治疗前、后测量患者的视近屈光度、调节近点、阅读速度和阅读视力、调制传递函数(modulation transfer function,MTF)截止频率和平均散射指数(mean object scatter index,Mean OSI)、主观症状评分.结果 2组治疗前视近屈光度、调节近点、阅读视力、阅读速度、MTF截止频率、Mean OSI及主观症状评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).(1)视近屈光度:2组治疗后视近屈光度较治疗前比较,及治疗后2组间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).(2)调节近点:治疗组治疗后调节近点较治疗前减小,差异有统计学意义(t=7.581,P=0.000);对照组调节近点较治疗前比较,及治疗后2组间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).(3)阅读速度和阅读视力:治疗后治疗组阅读速度提高比较,差异统计学意义(t=-2.273,P=0.031);对照组阅读速度较治疗前比较,及治疗后2组间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗组治疗后阅读视力较治疗前提高,差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.669,P=0.000);对照组阅读视力较治疗前比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗后2组间比较,治疗组优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(Z=-1.894,P=0.047).(4)Mean OSI和MTF截止频率:对照组治疗后Mean OSI值较治疗前增大,差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.884,P=0.004),而治疗组Mean OSI值较治疗前,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后2组间比较,治疗组优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.835,P=0.005).对照组治疗后MTF截止频率较治疗前减小,差异有统计学差异(t=4.439,P=0.000),而治疗组MTF截止频率较治疗前,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后2组间比较,治疗组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.019,P=0.004).(5)主观症状积分:治疗组治疗后主观症状评分较治疗前减小,差异有统计学意义(t=7.607,P=0.000),而对照组较治疗前,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后2组间比较,治疗组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=-2.527,P=0.014).(6)临床疗效:治疗组有效率为13.33%,对照组为9.68%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 "运目操"可不同程度地改善老视患者的阅读视力、阅读速度、调节近点及阅读疲劳、眼部酸痛和久视头晕等主观症状,可作为老视的一项干预措施予以推广.
Clinical Observation of the Intervention Effect of"Eye Moving Exercise"on Presby-opia
OBJECTIVE To observe the intervention effect of"eye moving exercise"on presbyopia.METHODS A total of 61 presbyopic patients(61 eyes)treated at the Eye Hospital,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences from March 2021 to October 2021 were randomly divided into a treatment group of 30 cases(30 eyes)and a control group of 31 cases(31 eyes).The"eye moving exercise"therapy and health education were respectively given to the two groups,and both were observed for eught weeks.The visual nearsightedness,near point adjustment,reading vision and speed,modulation transfer function(MTF)cutoff frequency,mean object scatter index(Mean OSI),and subjective symptom scores of the patients were measured before and after treatment.RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences in visual nearsightedness,near point adjustment,reading vision,reading speed,MTF cutoff frequency,Mean OSI,and subjective symptom scores between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05).(1)Nearsight diopter:After treatment,there were no statistically significant differences in nearsight diopter between the two groups and within each group(P>0.05).(2)Near point adjustment:After treatment,the treatment group showed a significant decrease in near point adjustment compared to before treatment(t=7.581,P=0.000),the control group showed no statistically significant difference compared to before treatment,as well as when comparing with the treatment group after treatment(P>0.05).(3)Reading speed and reading vision:After treatment,the treatment group exhibited an increase in reading speed,which was statistically significant(t=-2.273,P=0.031).However,the control group showed no statistically significant difference compared to before treatment,as well as when comparing with the treatment group after treatment(P>0.05).Reading vision in the treatment group significantly improved after treatment(Z=-3.669,P=0.000),whereas the control group showed no statistically significant difference compared to before treatment(P>0.05).When comparing the two groups after treatment,the treatment group was superior to the control group in terms of reading vision,and the difference was statistically significant(Z=-1.894,P=0.047).(4)Mean OSI and MTF cut off frequency:After treatment,the control group showed a significant increase in Mean OSI compared to before treatment(Z=-2.884,P=0.004),while the treatment group showed no statistically significant difference compared to before treatment(P>0.05).When comparing the two groups after treatment,the treatment group was superior to the control group in terms of Mean OSI,and the difference was statistically significant(Z=-2.835,P= 0.005).The MTF cutoff frequency in the control group significantly decreased after treatment(t= 4.439,P=0.000),while the treatment group showed no statistically significant difference compared to before treatment(P>0.05).When comparing the two groups after treatment,the treatment group had a higher MTF cutoff frequency than the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(t=3.019,P=0.004).(5)Subjective symptom scores:After treatment,the treatment group showed a significant decrease in subjective symptom scores compared to before treatment(t=7.607,P=0.000),while the control group showed no statistically significant difference compared to before treatment(P>0.05).When comparing the two groups after treatment,the treatment group had lower subjective symptom scores than the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(t=-2.527,P=0.014).(6)Clinical efficacy:The effective rate was 13.33%in the treatment group and 9.68%in the control group.There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment group and the control group(P>0.05).CONCLUSIONS"eye moving exercise"improves reading vision,reading speed,near point adjustment,and subjective symptoms such as reading fatigue,eye soreness,and dizziness in presbyopic patients to varying degrees.It can be promoted as an intervention measure for presbyopia.

presbyopiavisual functionsymptomseye moving exercise

左倩倩、许凯、李亚敏、黄子杨、李晓宇、周维、梁丽娜

展开 >

中国中医科学院眼科医院,北京 100040

老视 视功能 症状 运目操

国家自然科学基金项目国家自然科学基金项目中国中医科学院科技创新工程中国中医药循证医学中心"业务研究室主任专项"

8227458981973912CI2021A026022020YJSZX-2

2024

中国中医眼科杂志
中国中医科学院

中国中医眼科杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.476
ISSN:1002-4379
年,卷(期):2024.34(3)
  • 17