首页|两种胆总管结石合并胆囊结石治疗方案的比较研究

两种胆总管结石合并胆囊结石治疗方案的比较研究

A comparative study of two treatment methods for choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithi-asis

扫码查看
目的 比较内镜逆行胰胆管造影/内镜乳头括约肌切开+腹腔镜胆囊切除术(ERCP/EST+LC)与LC+胆总管探查取石术(LCBDE)治疗胆总管结石合并胆囊结石的临床疗效.方法 回顾性研究分析2018年3月至2021年3月菏泽市立医院收治的172例胆总管结石合并胆囊结石患者临床资料,其中男性78例,女性94例,年龄(66.88±9.72)岁.根据手术方式分为两组:行LC+LCBDE的患者86例纳入LC+LCBDE组,行ERCP/EST+LC的患者86例纳入ERCP/EST+LC组.比较两组患者的结石清除率、手术时间、术中出血量、术后并发症等指标.结果 胆总管结石最大径≥1.2 cm 时,ERCP/EST+LC 组首次结石清除率为 76.5%(13/17),小于 LC+LCBDE 组的 96.3%(26/27),差异有统计学意义(x2=4.07,P=0.044).胆总管结石数目≥3个时,ERCP/EST+LC组首次结石清除率78.9%(15/19)小于LC+LCBDE组的96.7%(29/30),差异有统计学意义(x2=3.99,P=0.046).LC+LCBDE 组和 ERCP/EST+LC 组的手术时间分别为(129.07±19.33)min 和(101.86±27.48)min,二者差异具有统计学意义(t=7.51,P<0.001).LC+LCBDE 组和 ERCP/EST+LC 组的术中出血量分别为25.0(20.0,30.0)ml和13.0(10.0,15.0)ml,二者差异具有统计学意义(Z=916.00,P<0.001).两组患者在年龄、性别、术前结石最大径、结石数目、术前胆总管内径、手术成功率、术后住院时间、总结石清除率、并发症发生率方面差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).结论 LC+LCBDE和ERCP/EST+LC均可以安全有效地治疗胆总管结石伴胆囊结石,当患者胆总管结石最大径≥1.2 cm或胆总管结石数目≥3个时,应优先考虑LC+LCBDE,而当患者一般情况欠佳时,应优先考虑 ERCP/EST+LC.
Objective To compare the treatment effect of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancre-atography/endoscopic sphincterotomy plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy(ERCP/EST+LC)and laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration(LC+LCBDE)for patients with choledo-cholithiasis combined with gallbladder stones.Methods Clinical data of 172 patients with choledocholithia-sis combined with gallbladder stones treated in Heze Municipal Hospital from March 2018 to March 2021 were retrospectilvely analyzed,including 78 males and 94 females,aged(66.88±9.72)years.According to surgical method,patients were divided into the ERCP/EST+LC group(n=86)and LC+LCBDE group(n=86).The initial clearance rate of choledochal stones,operation time,intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications were compared between the groups.Results The initial clearance rate of the choledochal stones of the ERCP/EST+LC group is 76.5%(13/17),lower than 96.3%(26/27)of LC+LCBDE group when the diameter of stones was over 1.2 cm(x2=4.07,P=0.044).When the number of choledochal stones were more than 3,the initial clearance rate of the ERCP/EST+LC group is 78.9%(15/19),lower than that of the LC+LCBDE group[96.7%(29/30),x2=3.99,P=0.046].The opera-tion time of LC+LCBDE group was longer than that of ERCP/EST+LC group[(129.07±19.33)min vs.(101.86±27.48)min,t=7.51,P<0.001].The median intraoperative blood loss of LC+LCBDE group and ERCP/EST+LC group was 25.0(20.0,30.0)ml and 13.0(10.0,15.0)ml,respectively(Z=916.00,P<0.001).The age,gender,maximum diameter of stones,number of stones,preoperative com-mon bile duct diameter,surgical success rate,postoperative hospital stay,total stone clearance rate,and complication rate were comparable between the groups(all P>0.05).Conclusion Both LC+LCBDE and ERCP/EST+LC are safe and feasible for choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis.When the maximum diameter of choledochal stones is ≥ 1.2 cm or the number of choledochal stones is≥ 3,LC+LCBDE should be favored.When patient is in poor general condition,ERCP/EST+LC might be more feasi-ble.

CholedocholithiasisGallbladder stonesEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancre-atographyExploration of common bile duct

张平、袁玉斌、季淑婷、孔杰、叶永强、王琛、李辉、赵海旺、孙智勇、石合现

展开 >

菏泽市立医院肝胆外科,菏泽 274000

胆总管结石病 胆囊结石 逆行胰胆管造影 胆总管探查

2024

中华肝胆外科杂志
中华医学会

中华肝胆外科杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.846
ISSN:1007-8118
年,卷(期):2024.30(12)