中华骨科杂志2024,Vol.44Issue(23) :1532-1540.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20240716-00407

肘关节外侧入路微型钢板内固定治疗Dubberley 3B型肱骨远端冠状面骨折

Clinical efficacy of mini plate internal fixation through lateral elbow joint approach for Dubberley 3B distal humeral coronal fractures

王庆伟 王华松 石华峰 胡寿勇 周奇煌 王军海
中华骨科杂志2024,Vol.44Issue(23) :1532-1540.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20240716-00407

肘关节外侧入路微型钢板内固定治疗Dubberley 3B型肱骨远端冠状面骨折

Clinical efficacy of mini plate internal fixation through lateral elbow joint approach for Dubberley 3B distal humeral coronal fractures

王庆伟 1王华松 2石华峰 1胡寿勇 1周奇煌 3王军海1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 荆门市中心医院,荆门 448000
  • 2. 解放军中部战区总医院,武汉 430070
  • 3. 荆门职业学院,荆门 448000
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 比较采用肘关节外侧入路微型钢板内固定与后方鹰嘴截骨入路内固定治疗Dubberley 3B型肱骨远端冠状面骨折的临床疗效.方法 回顾性分析2018年1月至2023年5月荆门市中心医院骨科(15例)和解放军中部战区总医院骨科(20例)诊治的35例Dubberley 3B型肱骨远端冠状面骨折患者资料,男24例,女11例;年龄32~64岁;左侧18例,右侧17例.采用肘关节外侧入路微型钢板内固定治疗23例(外侧入路组),常规后方鹰嘴截骨入路内固定治疗12例(后方入路组).记录并比较两组的手术切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、骨折愈合情况及并发症发生情况.术后1周、1个月采用视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)评价疼痛程度,术后3个月及末次随访时采用Mayo肘关节功能评分(Mayo elbow performance score,MEPS)评定肘关节功能恢复情况.结果 外侧入路组与后方入路组患者术前基线资料比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),外侧入路组患者随访(18.7±3.9)个月(范围12~47个月),后方入路组患者随访(22.3±4.7)个月(范围12~52个月).外侧入路组的手术切口长度为(10.5±0.9)cm、手术时间为(76.3±4.7)ml、术中出血量为(65.6±10.2)ml、住院时间为(10.4±1.5)d、骨折愈合时间为(4.2±0.9)个月,均小于后方入路组的(21.2±1.7)cm、(98.8±6.1)min、(148.5±14.9)ml、(15.8±1.6)d、(5.7±1.1)个月,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).术后1周、1个月外侧入路组VAS[(2.7±0.4)、(1.3±0.4)分]均低于后方入路组[(3.1±0.5)、(1.8±0.6)分],差异有统计学意义(t=2.577,P=0.015;t=2.288,P=0.029);术后3个月外侧入路组MEPS为(83.6±1.7)分,高于后方入路组的(60.3±4.2)分,差异有统计学意义(t=23.418,P<0.001).随访期间两组VAS均呈降低趋势、MEPS均呈增加趋势,末次随访时两组MEPS的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).至末次随访,外侧入路组3例发生关节退变,未见神经、血管损伤、螺钉切割、骨折不愈合、复位丢失、关节僵硬及异位骨化等并发症.后方入路组1例鹰嘴截骨处延迟愈合、1例骨折复位丢失,制动后骨折愈合,均出现不同程度关节僵硬;1例出现异位骨化,共4例出现肘关节僵硬.两组并发症发生率[13%(3/23)和33%(4/12)]的差异有统计学意义(x2=4.046,P=0.044).结论 肘关节外侧入路微型钢板内固定治疗Dubberley 3B型肱骨远端冠状面骨折,术中可做到充分显露,具有手术时间短、创伤小、内固定可靠、肘关节功能恢复良好、并发症少的优势.

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of using micro steel plate internal fixation through the lateral el-bow joint approach and traditional posterior olecranon osteotomy approach for the treatment of Dubberley 3B distal humeral coro-nal fracture.Method A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 35 patients with Dubberley 3B distal humeral coro-nal fractures admitted to the Orthopedics Department of Jingmen Central Hospital(15 cases)and the Central Theater Command General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army(20 cases)from January 2018 to May 2023.Among them,23 cases were treated with micro steel plate internal fixation through the lateral elbow joint approach(study group),and 12 cases were treated with tradi-tional posterior olecranon osteotomy approach internal fixation(control group).There were 24 males and 11 females aging from 32 to 64 years old with 18 left elbows and 17 right ones.All of them were fresh fracture cases.The surgical incision length,surgical time,intraoperative bleeding,hospital stay,fracture healing,and incidence of complications between the two groups were recorded and compared.Visual analog scale(VAS)was recorded at 1 week and 1 month after surgery.Function recovery was assessed using Mayo elbow joint function score(Mayo elbow performance score,MEPS)at 3 months and the last follow-up.Result There was no significant difference in preoperative baseline data between the study group and control group(P>0.05).Patients in the study group were followed up for 18.7±3.9 months(range 12-47 months)while those in the control group were followed up for 22.3±4.7 months(range 12-52 months).There were significant differences between the study group and control group in the surgical inci-sion length(10.5±0.9 cm vs.21.2±1.7 cm),surgical time(76.3±4.7 min vs.98.8±6.1 min),intraoperative blood loss(65.6±10.2 vs.148.5±14.9 ml),length of stay(10.4±1.5 vs.15.8±1.6 d),and fracture healing time(4.2±0.9 months vs.5.7±1.1 months)(P<0.05).At the follow-up of 1 week and 1 month,the VAS of the study group(2.7±0.4,1.3±0.4)were significantly lower compared to the control group(3.1±0.5,1.8±0.6),(t=2.577,2.288;P=0.015,0.029).At the follow up of 3 months,the MEPS of the study group were significantly higher compared to the control group(83.6±1.7 vs.60.3±4.2,t=23.418,P<0.001).With time,the VAS of both groups decreased significantly,and the MEPS increased significantly(P<0.05).At the last follow-up,there was no significant dif-ference in MEPS between the two groups(92.3±3.8 vs.89.5±5.7,P>0.05).At the last follow-up,there were 3 cases of joint degener-ation in the study group with no complications of nerve or vascular damage,screw cutting,nonunion of fractures,loss of reduction,joint stiffness,or ectopic ossification,while in the control group,there was one case of delayed healing at the olecranon osteotomy site,one case of poor reduction of the fracture,both treated with immobilization and showing varying degrees of joint stiffness;one case showed ectopic ossification,and a total of four patients experienced elbow joint stiffness.The incidence of complications be-tween the two groups[13.0%(3/23)vs.33.3%(4/12)]showed significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusion The treatment of Dub-berley 3B distal humeral coronal fracture through the lateral approach of elbow joint with mini steel plate internal fixation yielded good clinical results with the advantages of short surgical time,reliable internal fixation,satisfying joint function and fewer compli-cations.

关键词

肱骨骨折/骨折固定术,内/肘关节/Dubberley分型

Key words

Humeral fractures/Fracture fixation,internal/Elbow joint/Dubberley classification

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
中华骨科杂志
中华医学会

中华骨科杂志

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.137
ISSN:0253-2352
段落导航相关论文