中华护理教育2024,Vol.21Issue(1) :89-95.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2024.01.015

数字健康素养量表的汉化、修订及信效度检验

The sinicization of the Digital Health Literacy Instrument and the test of its reliability and validity

赵冰悦 徐钦 王晓娟 黄珑 张钰红 胡蓉芳
中华护理教育2024,Vol.21Issue(1) :89-95.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2024.01.015

数字健康素养量表的汉化、修订及信效度检验

The sinicization of the Digital Health Literacy Instrument and the test of its reliability and validity

赵冰悦 1徐钦 1王晓娟 1黄珑 1张钰红 1胡蓉芳1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 350000 福州市 福建医科大学护理学院
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 汉化、修订数字健康素养量表(Digital Health Literacy Instrument,DHLI),并检验其信度和效度.方法 根据Brislin翻译模型,将数字健康素养量表进行直译和回译,并对其进行文化调适;2022年7月—8月采用便利抽样法,借助在线问卷平台对458名调查对象进行调查,2周后从中随机抽取25名调查对象进行重测,检验中文版DHLI的信效度.结果 中文版DHLI共28个条目(21个自我评估主观条目和7个客观条目),其中21个主观条目经探索性因子分析提取出4个公因子,累计方差贡献率为71.630%.验证性因子分析结果显示,中文版DHLI的结果模型拟合较好(x2/df=2.850,CFI=0.924,IFI=0.924,TLI=0.904,RMSEA=0.088,RMR=0.046).量表的条 目内容效度指数为0.833~1.00,全体一致内容效度指数为0.964,平均内容效度指数为0.994;Cronbach's α为0.929,重测信度系数为0.828.结论 中文版DHLI量表具有良好的信效度,可作为实施数字健康服务的有效评估工具.

Abstract

Objective To translate and revise the Digital Health Literacy Instrument(DHLI)into Chinese and test its reliability and validity.Methods Literal translation,back translation and cultural adjustment of the DHLI were caried out based on the Brislin translation model.From July 2022 to August 2022,the convenience sampling method was used to investigate 458 respondents with the online survey platform,25 respondents of them were randomly selected to retest after two weeks,and the data was collected to analyze the reliability and validity.Results The Chinese version of the DHLI had 28 items(21 self-assessment items and 7 performance-based items),and the exploratory factor analysis(EFA)extracted four factors with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 71.630%for self-assessinent items.Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fitness of the constructed model(x2/df=2.850,CFI=0.924,IFI=0.924,TLI=0.904,RMSEA=0.088,RMR=0.046).The I-CVI was 0.833~1.00;the S-CVI/UA was 0.964;the S-CVI/Ave was 0.994;the Cronbach's α coefficient of the total scale was 0.929;the test-retest reliability was 0.828.Conclusion The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of DHLI are satisfactory,and it can serve as a valid assessment instrument for the implementation of digital health services.

关键词

数字健康素养/电子健康素养/信度/效度/量表

Key words

Digital health literacy/eHealth literacy/Reliability/Validity/Instrument

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

2021年度福建省中青年教师教育科研项目(JAS21071)

出版年

2024
中华护理教育
中华护理学会

中华护理教育

CSCD
影响因子:1.372
ISSN:1672-9234
参考文献量6
段落导航相关论文