首页|18F-FDG PET/CT联合常规影像学检查在直肠癌TNM分期中的价值

18F-FDG PET/CT联合常规影像学检查在直肠癌TNM分期中的价值

Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT combined with conventional imaging modalities in TNM staging of rectal cancer

扫码查看
目的 探讨18F-FDG PET/CT联合常规影像学检查在直肠癌肿瘤侵犯深度、区域淋巴结转移、远处脏器及淋巴结转移情况(TNM分期)及邻近结构侵犯评估中的价值.方法 回顾性选取2019年9月至2021年6月青岛大学附属青岛市中心医院收治的经病理证实的直肠癌患者54例[男28例、女26例,年龄(65.8±11.0)岁];患者在确诊前后2周内行18F-FDG PET/CT及常规影像学[直肠高分辨率MRI(HR-MRI)、胸部CT平扫、上腹部MRI或CT平扫+强化]检查.用18F-FDG PET/CT、常规影像学检查及两者联合对直肠癌进行TNM分期及邻近结构侵犯[环周切缘(CRM)、壁外血管侵犯(EMVI)、肛门括约肌复合体受累]评估,并与病理或最终临床随访结果对照.用x2检验比较单独18F-FDG PET/CT或常规影像学检查与联合检查的诊断效能差异.结果 联合检查评估T分期的准确性、评估N分期的灵敏度及准确性分别为96.30%(52/54)、98.65%(73/74)、93.91%(185/197),高于 18F-FDG PET/CT 的 85.19%(46/54)、66.22%(49/74)、81.73%(161/197),差异有统计学意义(x2值:3.97、26.88、13.66,均P<0.05);评估N分期的特异性[91.06%(112/123)]及准确性高于常规影像学检查的相应指标[77.24%(95/123)、83.76%(165/197);x2值:8.81、10.23,均 P<0.05];评估M分期的灵敏度及准确性[97.01%(65/67)、95.95%(71/74)]高于常规影像学组的相应指标[73.13%(49/67)、68.92%(51/74);x2值:15.05、18.66,均 P<0.001].联合检查评估 CRM、EMVI 的灵敏度分别为 100%(22/22)和 95.00%(19/20),准确性分别为 98.15%(53/54)和 96.30%(52/54),较 18F-FDG PET/CT 的 54.55%(12/22)、74.07%(40/54)、30.00%(6/20)和 74.07%(40/54)高(x2值:12.94、13.08、18.03、10.56,均P<0.01);评估EMVI的准确性也较常规影像学检查的高[85.19%(46/54);x2=3.97,P=0.046].结论 18F-FDG PET/CT联合常规影像学检查有助于提高对直肠癌TNM分期及邻近结构侵犯的诊断效能.
Objective To investigate the value of 18F-FDG PET/CT combined with conventional imaging modalities in the evaluation of the depth of tumor invasion,regional lymph node metastasis,distant organ and lymph node metastasis(TNM staging),and the adjacent structure invasion of rectal cancer.Meth-ods Fifty-four patients(28 males,26 females,age(65.8±11.0)years)with pathologically confirmed rec-tal cancer admitted to the Affiliated Qingdao Central Hospital of Qingdao University between September 2019 and June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.18F-FDG PET/CT examination,conventional imaging modali-ties including high-resolution MRI(HR-MRI),chest CT plain scan,upper abdominal MRI or CT plain scan+enhanced examination were performed within 2 weeks before or after the rectal cancer being confirmed.The TNM staging and adjacent structural invasions including circumferential resection margin(CRM),ex-tramural vascular invasion(EMVI),anal sphincter complex involvement were evaluated by 18 F-FDG PET/CT and conventional imaging modalities separately or in combination,and those results based on imaging were compared with the pathological results or clinical follow-up results.X2 test was used to compare the differences of diagnostic sensitivity,specificity and accuracy between the 18F-FDG PET/CT or conventional imaging modalities and combined examination.Results The accuracy for T staging and the sensitivity and accuracy for N staging of the combined examination were 96.30%(52/54),98.65%(73/74)and 93.91%(185/197),respectively,which were significantly higher than those of 18F-FDG PET/CT(85.19%(46/54),66.22%(49/74),81.73%(161/197);x2 values:3.97,26.88,13.66,all P<0.05).The specificity(91.06%,112/123)and accuracy of the combined examination for N staging were higher than those of the conventional imaging modalities(77.24%(95/123),83.76%(165/197);x2 values:8.81,10.23,both P<0.05).The sensitivity and accuracy of the combined examination for M staging were higher than those of the conventional imaging modalities(97.01%(65/67)vs 73.13%(49/67),95.95%(71/74)vs 68.92%(51/74);X2 values:15.05,18.66,both P<0.001).The sensitivities of the combined examination in evaluating CRM and EMVI were 100%(22/22)and 95.00%(19/20),and the accuracies were 98.15%(53/54)and 96.30%(52/54),all of which were higher than those of 18F-FDG PET/CT(CRM:54.55%(12/22),74.07%(40/54);EVMI:30.00%(6/20),74.07%(40/54);x2 values:12.94,13.08,18.03,10.56,all P<0.01).The accuracy of the combined examination in evaluating EMVI was higher than that of the conven-tional imaging modalities(85.19%(46/54);x2=3.97,P=0.046).Conclusion 18F-FDG PET/CT com-bined with conventional imaging modalities can improve the diagnostic efficacy for TNM staging and assess-ment of adjacent structural invasion in rectal cancer.

Rectal neoplasmsNeoplasm stagingPositron-emission tomographyTomography,X-ray computedFluorodeoxyglucose F18

李常虹、刘震、郭成、顾华勇、赵希鹏、高林、郭兴隆、路月、王艳丽

展开 >

青岛大学附属青岛市中心医院、青岛大学第二临床医学院分子影像科,青岛 266042

直肠肿瘤 肿瘤分期 正电子发射断层显像术 体层摄影术,X线计算机 氟脱氧葡萄糖F18

青岛市医药卫生科研指导项目

2022-WJZD096

2024

中华核医学与分子影像杂志
中华医学会

中华核医学与分子影像杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.107
ISSN:2095-2848
年,卷(期):2024.44(6)