首页|无托槽隐形矫治器联合前方牵引治疗替牙期骨性Ⅲ类错的三维有限元研究

无托槽隐形矫治器联合前方牵引治疗替牙期骨性Ⅲ类错的三维有限元研究

扫码查看
目的 应用有限元分析法比较螺旋扩弓器前方牵引与无托槽隐形矫治器联合前方牵引治疗对替牙期骨性Ⅲ类错上颌骨、上牙列的影响,以期为替牙期骨性Ⅲ类错无托槽隐形矫治提供参考.方法 选取1例2024年1月于第四军医大学口腔医院口腔正畸科就诊的替牙期骨性Ⅲ类错患者(男性,10岁)的口腔颌面部锥形束CT资料,建立三维有限元模型.设计扩弓器前牵组(A组)和无托槽前牵组(B组),均设置双侧前磨牙区扩弓0.25 mm,前方牵引力值分别为2.94 N(工况1)和4.90 N(工况2).分析两种工况下两组模型上颌骨、上牙列的初始位移趋势.结果 两种工况下两组上颌骨均表现为顺时针旋转、唇向位移趋势;无托槽前牵组上颌骨唇向位移更明显,为同种工况下扩弓器前牵组的2.2~3.0倍.两种工况下两组上颌牙列均表现为近中、颊向移动和前牙伸长、后牙压低趋势.工况1和工况2条件下,无托槽前牵组中切牙唇向位移量(-0.065、-0.089 mm)均大于扩弓器前牵组(-0.024、-0.024 mm).两种工况下,冠状向上扩弓器前牵组后牙接近颊向整体移动,无托槽前牵组则为颊向倾斜移动.随前牵力值增加,无托槽前牵组上颌骨、上牙列的位移趋势增加比扩弓器前牵组更明显.两种工况下无托槽前牵组前牙段牙周膜静水压力、牙槽骨等效应力均高于扩弓器前牵组,且主要集中于切牙唇侧颈部区域.结论 无托槽隐形矫治器联合前方牵引可对上颌骨产生向前的力量,但可伴上前牙唇倾,可作为替牙期骨性Ⅲ类错矫形治疗措施的一种选择.但鉴于三维有限元研究仅为体外模拟研究,相关结论尚待临床证据进一步验证.
Effects of clear aligners combined with maxillary protractor on mixed dentition patient with skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion:a finite element study
Objective To compare the effects of expansion screw with maxillary protractor and clear aligners combined with maxillary protractor on the maxilla and maxillary dentition of mixed dentition patients with class Ⅲ skeletal malocclusion using finite element analysis,further providing clinical guidance for clear aligner treatment.Methods A finite element model was established based on maxillofacial cone-beam CT data of a 10-year-old boy with mixed dentition,class Ⅲ skeletal malocclusion,who visited Department of Orthodontics,School of Stomatology,The Fourth Military Medical University in January,2024.The expander with protractor group(group A)and the clear aligners with protractor group(group B)were divided.The arch was extended by 0.25 mm in both groups,and the forward pull force was 2.94 N(working condition 1)and 4.90 N(working condition 2),respectively.The initial displacement trend of maxilla and maxillary dentition in two groups under two working conditions were evaluated.Results Under two working conditions,the maxilla of both groups showed clockwise rotation and labial inclination.The labial inclination of maxilla was more significant in clear aligners with protractor group,about 2.2-3.0 times that of expander with protractor group under the same working condition.Maxillary dentition showed mesial and buccal displacement,with anterior teeth extrusion and posterior teeth intrusion in two groups under two working conditions.Under the working condition 1 and 2,the labial displacement of central incisor of clear aligners with protractor group(-0.065,-0.089 mm)were greater than that in expander with protractor group(-0.024,-0.024 mm).Under two working conditions,the posterior teeth of expander with protractor group moved close to the buccal bodily direction,while those of clear aligners with protractor group moved tilted towards the buccal direction in the horizontal direction.The forward displacement trend of maxilla and maxillary dentition in clear aligners with protractor group was more obvious than expander with protractor group with the increase of the forward pull force.Under two working conditions,the anterior teeth's hydrostatic stress of periodontal membrane and the equivalent stress of alveolar bone in clear aligners with protractor group were higher than those in expander with protractor group,mainly concentrated on the labial cervical region of the incisor.Conclusions Clear aligners combined with maxillary protractor can produce forward force on the maxilla,but labial inclination occurs in the anterior teeth.It can be an effective orthopedic treatment strategy for mixed dentition patients with classⅢ skeletal malocclusion.

Malocclusion,Angle class ⅢDentition,mixedGrowth and developmentFinite element analysisClear alingerAnterior protractionEarly orthodontic treatment

马艳宁、强茹月、金作林

展开 >

第四军医大学口腔医院口腔正畸科口颌系统重建与再生全国重点实验室国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心陕西省口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,西安 710032

错,安氏Ⅲ类 牙列,混合 生长和发育 有限元分析 透明矫治器 前方牵引 早期矫治

国家口腔疾病临床研究中心专项

LCA202202

2024

中华口腔医学杂志
中华医学会

中华口腔医学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.194
ISSN:1002-0098
年,卷(期):2024.59(9)