Objective To explore the expert opinions on the revision of the Diagnosis of Occupational Arsenic Poisoning(GBZ 83-2013).Methods In March 2023,the improved Delphi expert consultation method was adopted,in the first round of consultation,a pre-survey was conducted on 20 experts,and the questionnaire was improved according to the experts'opinions.Then,a second round of expert consultation questionnaire was formed to conduct a questionnaire survey and consultation of 50 experts engaged in occupational disease diagnosis and related work.The feedback of experts was collected and analyzed.Results The average score for the scientificity and progressiveness of the main technical content of the original standard was 3.33,and the average score for the rationality and operability of the main technical content of the original standard was 3.25.The importance of individual indicators with specific connotations were ranged from 4.20 to 4.45,with coefficients of variation＜0.25,and the experts'opinions were relatively concentrated.The experts have provided feedback indicating that the original standard had issues such as lack of continuity in diagnostic gradation,the need to integrate biomarkers with urinary and hair arsenic levels,a scarcity of objective diagnostic indicators,the removal of exposure response from the main text,and a low level of consistency in standard usage.These issues need to be revised urgently.Conclusion The Diagnosis of Occupational Arsenic Poisoning(GBZ 83-2013)should be revised based on experts'feedback and suggestions to meet the current real demand for occupational arsenic poisoning diagnosis.
Arsenic poisoningOccupationalInvestigation and researchDelphi method
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
