首页|经尿道膀胱肿瘤铥激光整块切除术与传统等离子电切术治疗NMIBC的术后复发率比较

经尿道膀胱肿瘤铥激光整块切除术与传统等离子电切术治疗NMIBC的术后复发率比较

扫码查看
目的 比较经尿道铥激光膀胱肿瘤整块切除术(ERBT)与传统经尿道膀胱肿瘤等离子电切术(TURBT)治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者术后复发率的差异.方法 回顾性分析2010年1月至2024年3月在华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院接受铥激光ERBT或TURBT治疗的1 439例NMIBC患者的临床资料.其中采用铥激光ERBT治疗201例(铥激光ERBT组),采用TURBT治疗1 238例(TURBT组).采用1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM),消除由于非随机分配而产生的选择偏倚,保证两组患者间的临床基线数据,如性别、年龄、病理诊断、T分期、肿瘤分级、肿瘤大小及肿瘤数量具有可比性.采用Kaplan-Meier法生成匹配后两组患者的无复发生存曲线,并通过log-rank检验比较组间差异.采用单因素和多因素Cox回归分析影响患者术后复发的独立危险因素.结果 经过PSM后,两组各纳入193例患者,两组性别(P=0.317)、年龄(P=0.207)、病理类型(P=0.756)、T分期(P=0.402)、肿瘤分级(P=0.965)、肿瘤大小(P=0.821)、肿瘤数量(P=0.421)差异均无统计学意义.随访中位时间为16.2(8.0,33.9)个月.去除非尿路上皮肿瘤患者后,铥激光ERBT组180例,TURBT组184例.生存分析结果显示,铥激光ERBT组尿路上皮肿瘤患者的术后复发率低于TURBT组[20.0%(36/180)与 38.6%(71/184),P<0.001].铥激光 ERBT组较 TURBT组尿路上皮肿瘤患者的复发率在肿瘤直径≤30 mm[22.3%(29/130)与33.6%(45/134),P=0.017]和>30 mm[14.0%(7/50)与52.0%(26/50),P=0.002]中均更低.在单发肿瘤患者中,铥激光ERBT组的复发率低于TURBT组[10.5%(11/105)与31.5%(35/111),P<0.001];在多发肿瘤患者中,铥激光ERBT组与TURBT组的复发率差异无统计学意义[35.7%(25/70)与47.9%(34/71),P=0.061].单因素和多因素Cox回归分析结果显示,铥激光ERBT治疗是NMIBC患者术后复发的独立保护因素(HR=0.44,95%CI0.30~0.66,P<0.001).病理类型为腺癌(HR=5.85,95%CI 2.07~16.51,P<0.001)、鳞癌(HR=2.98,95%CI 1.04~8.55,P=0.042)或其他类型(HR=2.98,95%CI 1.14~7.75,P=0.026)的患者,复发风险更高.肿瘤高级别患者术后复发风险增加(HR=1.84,95%CI 1.21~2.79,P=0.004).此外,肿瘤直径>30 mm较≤30 mm者术后复发风险增加(HR=2.00,95%CI 1.31~3.05,P=0.001).单发肿瘤较多发肿瘤患者术后复发风险显著降低(HR=0.50,95%CI 0.34~0.73,P<0.001).结论 无论肿瘤直径的大小,铥激光ERBT治疗NMIBC较TURBT可显著降低尿路上皮肿瘤患者的术后复发率;且铥激光ERBT在单发膀胱肿瘤患者中优势更明显.此外,高级别肿瘤、肿瘤直径>30 mm或多发膀胱肿瘤患者术后复发风险更高.
Comparison of recurrence rates between transurethral Thulium laser en bloc resection and traditional plasma electrocautery resection in the treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer
Objective To compare the postoperative recurrence rates between Thulium laser en bloc resection of bladder tumor(ERBT)and traditional transurethral resection of bladder tumor(TURBT)in treating patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer(NMIBC).Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 1 439 patients with NMIBC who underwent either Thulium laser ERBT or TURBT in Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,between January 2010 and March 2024.Among them,201 patients received Thulium laser ERBT,while 1 238 patients underwent TURBT.Propensity score matching(PSM)was employed in a 1:1 ratio to eliminate selection bias due to non-random assignment,ensuring the comparability of clinical baseline data such as gender,age,pathological diagnosis,T stage,tumor grade,tumor size,and tumor number between the two groups.Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate recurrence-free survival curves for the matched groups,and the log-rank test was conducted to compare differences between the groups.Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors affecting postoperative recurrence.Results After PSM matching,193 patients were included in each group.There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of gender(P=0.317),age(P=0.207),pathological type(P=0.756),T stage(P=0.402),tumor grade(P=0.965),tumor size(P=0.821),or number of tumors(P=0.421).The median follow-up time was 16.2(8.0,33.9)months.Excluding patients with non-urothelial tumors such as adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma,there were 180 cases in the Thulium laser ERBT group and 184 cases in the TURBT group.Survival analysis showed that the postoperative recurrence rate of urothelial carcinoma patients in the Thulium laser ERBT group was lower than that in the TURBT group[20.0%(36/180)vs.38.6%(71/184),P<0.001].Stratified survival analysis indicated that in patients with tumor diameters ≤30 mm[22.3%(29/130)vs.33.6%(45/134),P=0.017]or>30 mm[14.0%(7/50)vs.52.0%(26/50),P=0.002],the Thulium laser ERBT group had lower postoperative recurrence rate compared to the TURBT group.Among patients with single tumor,the recurrence rate in the Thulium laser ERBT group was lower than in the TURBT group[10.5%(11/105)vs.31.5%(35/111),P<0.001].However,among patients with multiple tumors,there was no statistically significant difference in recurrence rates between the Thulium laser ERBT group and the TURBT group[35.7%(25/70)vs.47.9%(34/71),P=0.061].Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that Thulium laser ERBT treatment was an independent protective factor against postoperative recurrence in NMIBC patients(HR=0.44,95%CI0.30-0.66,P<0.001).Patients with adenocarcinoma(HR=5.85,95%CI2.07-16.51,P<0.001),squamous cell carcinoma(HR=2.98,95%CI 1.04-8.55,P=0.042),or other types of tumors(HR=2.98,95%CI 1.14-7.75,P=0.026)had higher risks of recurrence.High-grade tumor patients faced increased risks of postoperative recurrence(HR=1.84,95%CI 1.21-2.79,P=0.004).Additionally,tumors>30 mm had increased risks of postoperative recurrence compared to those ≤30 mm(HR=2.00,95%CI1.31-3.05,P=0.001).Patients with single tumor had significantly reduced risks of postoperative recurrence compared to those with multiple tumors(HR=0.50,95%CI 0.34-0.73,P<0.001).Conclusions Regardless of tumor diameter(≤30 mm or>30 mm),Thulium laser ERBT significantly reduces the postoperative recurrence rate in patients with urothelial carcinoma compared to TURBT,with the advantage being more pronounced in patients with single bladder tumor.Additionally,patients with high-grade tumors,tumor diameters>30 mm,or multiple bladder tumors have higher risk of postoperative recurrence.

Urinary bladder neoplasmsCarcinomaNon-muscle-invasiveThulium laser en bloc resection of bladder tumorTransurethral resection of bladder tumorPropensity score matchingPostoperative recurrence rate

刘利龙、刘征、姚志鹏、宋晓东、宋文、胡嘏、李凡、胡恒龙、谌科

展开 >

华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院泌尿外科,武汉 430030

膀胱肿瘤 非肌层浸润 经尿道铥激光膀胱肿瘤整块切除术 经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术 倾向评分匹配 术后复发率

国家资助博士后研究人员计划B档项目中国博士后科学基金面上项目

GZB202302432023M731199

2024

中华泌尿外科杂志
中华医学会

中华泌尿外科杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.628
ISSN:1000-6702
年,卷(期):2024.45(7)