首页|三种钬激光前列腺剜除术后尿失禁的比较

三种钬激光前列腺剜除术后尿失禁的比较

扫码查看
目的 探讨钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)保留不同结构治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的疗效及对术后尿失禁的影响.方法 回顾性分析2020年6月至2023年6月于浙江大学医学院附属金华医院行钬激光前列腺剜除术的242例BPH患者的临床资料,其中89例行保留前列腺前叶或者部分前叶的HoLEP(A组),81例行保留前列腺尖部尿道黏膜的HoLEP(B组),72例行传统HoLEP(C组).A、B、C 组患者年龄[(73.72±6.35)岁与(72.58±6.14)岁与(73.18±6.73)岁]、前列腺体积[(82.31±43.58)ml 与(81.54±42.83)ml 与(82.12±44.27)ml]、糖尿病比例[11 例(12.4%)与9 例(11.1%)与 7例(9.7%)]、膀胱结石比例[9例(10.1%)与6例(7.4%)与6例(8.3%)]、尿潴留比例[20例(22.5%)与 17 例(21.0%)与 14 例(19.4%)]、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)[(22.47±3.56)分与(21.83±4.18)分与(21.54±3.37)分]、生活质量评分(QOL)[(4.87±0.92)分与(4.65±0.86)分与(4.74±0.73)分]、最大尿流率(Qmax)[(8.32±3.09)ml/s 与(8.41±2.75)ml/s 与(7.96±2.82)ml/s]差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).比较三组围手术期相关指标,以及术后1周、1个月、3个月的IPSS、QOL、Qmax、尿失禁发生率等.结果 三组手术均顺利完成,无中转开放或改行其他术式.A、B、C三组手术剜除时间[(35.17±12.38)min 与(34.19±10.26)min 与(33.75±11.34)min]、前列腺剜除质量[(57.43±37.58)g 与(59.72±38.35)g 与(60.37±39.52)g]、留置尿管时间[(3.18±1.55)d 与(3.62±1.78)d与(3.49±1.69)d]、包膜穿孔比例[1例(1.1%)与1例(1.2%)与2例(2.8%)]、术后感染比例[1例(1.1%)与1例(1.2%)与2例(2.8%)]差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).A组术后1周及术后1个月的IPSS[(9.41±2.21)、(8.34±1.67)分]、QOL[(2.17±0.58)、(1.89±0.41)分]、Qmax[(20.53±5.18)、(22.41±6.17)ml/s]均较术前改善明显,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).B组术后1周及术后1个月的IPSS[(10.19±2.47)、(8.73±1.81)分]、QOL[(2.63±0.62)、(2.14±0.57)分]、Qmax[(19.64±4.59)、(21.43±5.39)ml/s]均较术前改善明显,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).C组术后1周及术后1个月的IPSS[(10.35±1.98)、(9.21±1.78)分]、QOL[(2.79±0.76)、(2.28±0.68)分]、Qmax[(20.21±5.83)、(23.15±5.49)ml/s]均较术前改善明显,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).三组之间术后同一时间点上述指标差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).A组和B组术后1周尿失禁发生率分别为2.2%(2/89)和12.3%(10/81),均明显低于C组[34.7%(25/72)],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组术后1周尿失禁发生率明显低于B组(P<0.05).A组和B组术后1个月尿失禁发生率[0(0/89)和6.2%(5/81)]均明显低于C组[22.2%(16/72)],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组术后1个月尿失禁发生率明显低于B组(P<0.05).结论 与保留前列腺尖部尿道黏膜的HoLEP和传统HoLEP相比,保留前列腺前叶或者部分前叶的HoLEP可以显著降低术后尿失禁的发生,值得临床探索应用.
Comparison of three Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with postoperative urinary incontinence
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and advantage of urinary continence after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate(HoLEP)with reservation of different structures for benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).Methods The data of 242 patients with BPH who underwent HoLEP in Affiliated Jinhua Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine from June 2020 to June 2023 were analyzed retrospectively.Of the 242 patients,89 received anterior lobe-sparing HoLEP(Group A),81 received HoLEP with partial urethral mucosa reservation(group B),and 72 received conventional HoLEP(group C).There were no significant differences among the three groups(P>0.05)in terms of the age[(73.72±6.35)years old vs.(72.58±6.14)years old vs.(73.18±6.73)years old].prostate volume[(82.31±43.58)ml vs.(81.54±42.83)ml vs.(82.12±44.27)ml],the proportion of diabetes mellitus[11 cases(12.4%)vs.9 cases(11.1%)vs.7 cases(9.7%)],the proportion of calculus of bladder[9 cases(10.1%)vs.6 cases(7.4%)vs.6 cases(8.3%)],the proportion of urinary retention[20 cases(22.5%)vs.17 cases(21.0%)vs.14 cases(19.4%)],international prostate symptom score(IPSS)[(22.47±3.56)vs.(21.83±4.18)vs.(21.54±3.37)],quality of life score(QOL)[(4.87±0.92)vs.(4.65±0.86)vs.(4.74±0.73)]and quantity of maximum flow rate(Qmax)[(8.32±3.09)ml/s vs.(8.41±2.75)ml/s vs.(7.96±2.82)ml/s].The perioperative related indexes of the three groups were compared.IPSS,QOL,Qmax,and the incidence of urinary incontinence at 1 week,1 month and 3 months after surgery were compared in the three groups.Results All procedures were performed successfully without conversion.Among groups A,B,and C,the differences of surgical enucleation time[(35.17±12.38)min vs.(34.19±10.26)min vs.(33.75±11.34)min],prostate enucleation mass[(57.43±37.58)g vs.(59.72±38.35)g vs.(60.37±39.52)g],retention of urinary catheter time[(3.18±1.55)d vs.(3.62±1.78)d vs.(3.49±1.69)d],the proportion of perforation of the peritoneum[1 case(1.1%)vs.1 case(1.2%)vs.2 cases(2.8%)],and the proportion of postoperative infections[1 case(1.1%)vs.1 case(1.2%)vs.2 cases(2.8%)]were not statistically significant(P>0.05).At 1st week and 1st month after surgery in group A,IPSS[(9.41±2.21),(8.34±1.67)points],QOL[(2.17±0.58),(1.89±0.41)points].Qmax[(20.53±5.18),(22.41±6.17)ml/s]were significantly improved as compared with those before surgery(P<0.05).At 1st week and 1st month after surgery in group B,IPSS[(10.19±2.47),(8.73±1.81)points],QOL[(2.63±0.62),(2.14±0.57)points],Qmax[(19.64±4.59),(21.43±5.39)ml/s]were significantly improved as compared with those before surgery(P<0.05).At 1st week and 1st month after surgery in group C,IPSS[(10.35±1.98),(9.21±1.78)points],QOL[(2.79±0.76),(2.28±0.68)points],Qmax[(20.21±5.83),(23.15±5.49)ml/s]were significantly improved as compared with those before surgery(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the IPSS,QOL and Qmax at the same time among the three groups(P>0.05).The incidence of postoperative urinary incontinence after one week in group A and group B were significantly lower than that in group C[2.2%(2/89)vs.12.3%(10/81)vs.34.7%(25/72),P<0.05],and the incidence of postoperative urinary incontinence after one week in group A was significantly lower than that in group B(P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative urinary incontinence after one month in group A and group B were significantly lower than that in group C[0(0/89)vs.6.2%(5/81)vs.22.2%(16/72),P<0.05],and the incidence of postoperative urinary incontinence after one month in group A was significantly lower than that in group B(P<0.05).Conclusions Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with anterior lobe-sparing can significantly reduce the incidence of urinary incontinence after operation,which is worthy of clinical application.

Prostatic hyperplasiaHolmium laser enucleation of the prostateUrinary incontinenceEfficacy

孙鹏、徐旻、吴海啸、黄汀、张恒、朱李

展开 >

浙江大学医学院附属金华医院泌尿外科,金华 321000

前列腺增生 钬激光前列腺剜除术 尿失禁 疗效

2024

中华泌尿外科杂志
中华医学会

中华泌尿外科杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.628
ISSN:1000-6702
年,卷(期):2024.45(11)