中华麻醉学杂志2024,Vol.44Issue(10) :1190-1194.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn131073.20240316.01008

超声评估急诊腹部手术患者胃内容物误吸风险的效果

Effectiveness of ultrasound assessing risk of gastric content aspiration in patients undergoing emer-gency abdominal surgery

张蕾 高学 姜龙 金海龙 薛富善
中华麻醉学杂志2024,Vol.44Issue(10) :1190-1194.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn131073.20240316.01008

超声评估急诊腹部手术患者胃内容物误吸风险的效果

Effectiveness of ultrasound assessing risk of gastric content aspiration in patients undergoing emer-gency abdominal surgery

张蕾 1高学 2姜龙 1金海龙 1薛富善2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 首都医科大学大兴教学医院(北京市大兴区人民医院)麻醉科,北京 100026
  • 2. 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院麻醉科,北京 100050
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 评价超声评估急诊腹部手术患者胃内容物误吸风险的效果.方法 本研究为前瞻性自身对照研究.选取2022年6月至2023年12月在北京市大兴区人民医院行急诊腹部手术的患者73例,年龄>18岁,ASA分级Ⅰ-Ⅲ级.基于禁食禁饮时间(以下简称时间法)评估误吸风险:询问患者禁食禁饮时间和食物类别,判断患者胃排空状态和胃内容物误吸风险,并制订初步麻醉方案.超声法评估误吸风险:确定胃内容物性质,测量胃窦横截面积,估算胃内液体量,进行胃窦Perlas分级,以评估胃内容物误吸风险,并制订最终麻醉方案并实施.结果 时间法和超声法判断的胃内容物误吸高风险例数分别为2例(3%)和11例(15%),比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).有11例患者经超声检查后胃内容物误吸风险评级发生了变化,1例时间法判断为高风险患者被超声法改判为低风险,另10例时间法判断低风险的患者被超声法改判为高风险.基于两种方法制订的麻醉诱导方案比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),气道维持方案比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).仅1例(1%)患者发生反流,无患者发生胃内容物误吸.结论 对于急诊腹部手术患者,术前超声检查可用于评估胃内容物误吸风险和指导麻醉方案制订.

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound assessing the risk of gastric con-tent aspiration in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery.Methods This was a prospective self-control study.Seventy-three American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification Ⅰ-Ⅲ pa-tients,aged>18 yr,who underwent emergency abdominal surgery in Beijing Daxing District People's Hos-pital from June 2022 to December 2023,were selected.Time method assessment:The time and category of fasting and no-drinking were inquired,the patient's gastric emptying status and risk of gastric content aspi-ration were assessed based on the time of fasting and no-drinking,and a preliminary anesthesia plan was for-mulated.Ultrasound method assessment:The properties of gastric contents were determined,the cross-sec-tional area of the gastric antrum was measured,the volume of gastric fluid was estimated,the Perlas grading of the gastric antrum was performed to assess the risk of gastric content aspiration,and a final anesthesia plan for implementation was formulated.Results The number of patients with a high-risk of gastric content aspiration determined by the time method and ultrasound method was 2 cases(3% )and 11 cases(15% ),respectively,with a statistically significant difference between the two methods(P<0.05).The risk class of gastric content aspiration changed after ultrasound examination in 11 patients.One patient with a high risk determined by the time method was identified as having a low risk by the ultrasound method,and the other 10 patients with a low risk determined by the time method were identified as having a high risk by the ultra-sound method.There was a statistically significant difference in the anesthesia induction plans formulated based on two methods(P<0.05),while there was no statistically significant difference in the airway mainte-nance plans between the two methods(P>0.05).Regurgitation of gastric contents occurred only in one case(1.4% ),and no gastric content aspiration was found in any case.Conclusions Preoperative gastric ultra-sound examination can be used to assess the risk of gastric content aspiration and guide the formulation of anesthesia plans for the patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery.

关键词

超声检查/腹部/急诊处理/误吸

Key words

Ultrasonography/Abdomen/Emergency treatment/Aspiration

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
中华麻醉学杂志
中华医学会

中华麻醉学杂志

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.235
ISSN:0254-1416
参考文献量16
段落导航相关论文