首页|《反家庭暴力法(征求意见稿)》的域外经验--大陆法系典型国家涉家庭暴力立法的考察报告

《反家庭暴力法(征求意见稿)》的域外经验--大陆法系典型国家涉家庭暴力立法的考察报告

扫码查看
大陆法系典型国家的涉家庭暴力立法,分为两种模式,一种是有家庭暴力单项立法的模式,另一种是无单项立法的模式。前者有德国、法国、日本、韩国,后者有瑞士、意大利、俄罗斯。就前者而言,其单项立法出台背景是现有法律资源不足以保障受害人权益。单项立法在法律程序、证据规则、法律责任及保护措施等方面有其特殊性。在立法模式上,采综合立法模式,即以家庭暴力单项法为主体,通过民法、刑法等法律部门综合作用来保障受害人权益。在实施效果上,单项立法和受害人权益保护程度呈正相关关系。无论有无单项立法,家庭暴力犯罪都是不同于普通暴力犯罪的特殊暴力犯罪,其发生率和社会经济发展水平之间无因果关系。我国《反家庭暴力法(征求意见稿)》的出台,符合世界潮流,有利于最大限度地保护家庭暴力受害人,是一部良法。
The Investigation of the Legislation on Domestic Violence in Typical State in Civil Law System
There are two modes in the legislation on domestic violence in typical state in civil law system:one is the specific legislation on domestic violence,such as in Germany,France,Japan and South Korea;and the other is no specific legislation on domestic violence,such as in Switzerland,Italy and Russia.As for the for-mer one,the reason for the introduction to the specific legislation on domestic violence is the lack of legal re-sources and the better protection of the rights of victims.The specific legislation on domestic violence enjoys its particularity in legal procedures,rules of evidence,legal liability,protection measures,etc.The compre-hensive legislation model is employed,in which the specific legislation on domestic violence plays the most important role with the help of the combined effects of civil law,criminal law and so on to protect the rights of victims.There is positive correlation between the single legislation and the protection of the victims’rights and interests.Whether there is the specific legislation on domestic violence or not,the domestic violence crime are different from the ordinary ones,which is not directly connected with the socio-economic develop-ment.In order to protect the rights of victims,our country needs the specific legislation on domestic violence.

domestic violenceanti-domestic violencelegislation on domestic violence

李春斌

展开 >

辽宁师范大学,辽宁大连 116081

家庭暴力 反家庭暴力法 家庭暴力立法

2012年国家社会科学基金

12CFX058

2015

山东女子学院学报
山东女子学院

山东女子学院学报

影响因子:0.267
ISSN:1008-6838
年,卷(期):2015.(2)
  • 3
  • 2