中华普通外科杂志2024,Vol.39Issue(6) :450-455.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn113855-20240112-00034

新型抗反流袖状胃切除术与袖状胃切除联合食管裂孔疝修补术的临床疗效对比

Comparison of clinical efficacy between a novel antireflux sleeve gastrectomy and sleeve gastrectomy combined with esophageal hiatal hernia repair surgery

艾克拜尔·艾力 崔剑昱 皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明 黎鑫 玉素江·图荪托合提 王浩 克力木·阿不都热依木
中华普通外科杂志2024,Vol.39Issue(6) :450-455.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn113855-20240112-00034

新型抗反流袖状胃切除术与袖状胃切除联合食管裂孔疝修补术的临床疗效对比

Comparison of clinical efficacy between a novel antireflux sleeve gastrectomy and sleeve gastrectomy combined with esophageal hiatal hernia repair surgery

艾克拜尔·艾力 1崔剑昱 2皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫 1麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明 1黎鑫 2玉素江·图荪托合提 2王浩 2克力木·阿不都热依木1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院微创、疝和腹壁外科,乌鲁木齐 830001;新疆胃食管反流病与减重代谢外科临床医学研究中心,乌鲁木齐 830002;新疆维吾尔自治区普外微创研究所,乌鲁木齐 830002
  • 2. 新疆维吾尔自治区普外微创研究所,乌鲁木齐 830002;新疆医科大学研究生学院,乌鲁木齐 830054
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 评价新型抗反流袖状胃切除术(LSGFD)与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术联合食管裂孔疝修补术(LSG+HHR)治疗肥胖合并胃食管反流病(GERD)的疗效.方法 回顾性分析2020年1月至2022年 1月新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院收治的73例肥胖合并GERD患者,其中41例行LSGFD术,32例行LSG+HHR,收集并比较患者术前及术后1年的GERD调查问卷评分表(Gerd-Q)、测酸测压等相关临床资料的差异.结果 两组患者术后BMI较术前均有明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术后BMI下降百分比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组术后Gerd-Q评分、酸反流分析和食管动力学分析较术前差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后LSGFD的DeMeester评分较LSG+HHR术后下降明显,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术中出血量、住院时间和手术时长差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).LSGFD组出院后并发症(恶心或呕吐、贫血)发生率和GERD复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 LSGFD在治疗肥胖合并GERD方面较LSG+HHR疗效更好.

Abstract

Objective To evaluate a novel anti-reflux sleeve gastrectomy(LSGFD)in comparison with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy combined with hiatal hernia repair(LSG+HHR)for the treatment of obesity-combined gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD).Method Seventy-three patients admitted at Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region People's Hospital from Jan 2020 to Jan 2022 underwent LSGFD(41 cases)or LSG+HHR(32 cases),and the patients'preoperative and 1-year postoperative GERD questionnaire scores(Gerd-Q),acidometry and manometry and other relevant clinical data were collected and compared.Results The postoperative BMI of the two groups was significantly lower than that of the preoperative period,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);the comparison of the percentage of postoperative body mass loss between the two groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Differences in postoperative Gerd-Q score,acid reflux analysis and esophageal dynamics analysis of the two groups were statistically significant compared with the preoperative period(P<0.05),DeMeester score of LSGFD decreased significantly compared with that of LSG+HHR(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss,hospitalization time and duration of the operation between the two groups(P>0.05)The incidence of post-discharge complications(nausea or vomiting,anemia)and the recurrence rate of GERD were lower in the LSGFD group,though there was no statistically significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusion LSGFD is better than LSG+HHR in treating obesity combined with GERD.

关键词

肥胖症/胃食管反流/胃切除术/疝,食管裂孔/胃底折叠术

Key words

Obesity/Gastroesophageal reflux/Gastrectomy/Hernia,hiatal/Fundoplication

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
中华普通外科杂志
中华医学会

中华普通外科杂志

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.11
ISSN:1007-631X
参考文献量4
段落导航相关论文