首页|中央中核电刺激与脑区响应的电生理分析

中央中核电刺激与脑区响应的电生理分析

扫码查看
目的 探讨药物难治性癫痫患者立体脑电图(SEEG)电极置入并电刺激中央中核(CMT)后各脑区是否存在响应以及其响应程度.方法 回顾性分析2022年1月至2023年5月上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院脑病中心收治的10例在CMT及可疑的发作起始同步置入SEEG电极的药物难治性癫痫患者的临床资料.记录电刺激所得数据,并分析有效触点的同期电生理信号,比较各脑区响应触点的出现率和响应波幅.结果 10例患者共记录到1 062个有效触点的同期电生理信号,共491个触点(46.2%)记录到同频响应,其中中央前、后回的响应触点出现率最高,为81.0%(51/63),其次为顶叶和额叶,出现率分别为56.5%(61/108)和53.3%(253/475),出现率(比例)最低的2个脑区为颞叶[18.6%(22/118)]及海马、杏仁核(4/19).各脑区响应触点出现率(比例)的差异具有统计学意义(H=14.13,P=0.049).10例患者电刺激CMT的响应波幅[M(范围)]为40.3(0~1 000.0)μV.在各脑区的响应程度方面,波幅最高的是海马、杏仁核[398.0(0~1 000.0)μV],其次为顶叶[81.5(12.0~336.2)μV],响应波幅最低的脑区为颞叶[19.5(8.1~27.8)μV].去除极限值后,不同脑区响应程度的差异无统计学意义(H=8.41,P=0.298).结论 采用SEEG电极电刺激CMT时,药物难治性癫痫患者不同脑区的响应存在差异,中央沟前后的脑区响应比例高于远离中央沟的脑区;去除极限值后,不同脑区的响应程度并无明显区别.
Electrophysiological analysis of electrical stimulation of centromedian thalamic nucleus and responses of various brain regions
Objective To investigate the occurrence and amplitude of responses of different brain regions to electrical stimulation of the centromedian thalamic nucleus(CMT)in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent implantation of stereoelectroencephalography(SEEG)electrodes.Methods The clinical data of 10 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent SEEG electrode implantation in CMT and suspicious onset zone at the same time from January 2022 to May 2023 at the Clinic Neuroscience Center of Shanghai Ruijin Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine were retrospectively analyzed.Through electrical stimulation and recording of effective electrophysiological signals,the occurrence rate of response contacts and response amplitude in different brain regions were compared.Results A total of 1062 effective contacts were determined in 10 patients,and the same-frequency responses were recorded in 491 contacts(46.2%).The occurrence of response contacts in the anterior and posterior central gyri was the highest[81.0%(51/63)],followed by the parietal and frontal lobes[56.5%(61/108)and 53.2%(253/475),respectively].The two brain regions with the lowest rates were temporal lobe[18.6%(22/118)]and hippocampus and amygdala(4/19).The difference of response contact occurrence among various brain regions was statistically significant(H=14.13,P=0.049).The response amplitude of 10 patients was 40.3(0-1 000.0)μV.In terms of the response degree of different brain regions,the highest amplitude was observed in the hippocampus and amygdala[398.0(0-1 000.0)μV],followed by parietal lobe[81.5(12.0-336.2)μV].The lowest amplitude was found in temporal lobe[19.5(8.1-27.8)pV].After removing the outliers,there was no significant difference in the response degree of different brain regions(H=8.41,P=0.298).Conclusions When SEEG electrodes are used to electrically stimulate CMT,there are differences in the responses of different brain areas in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.The response ratio of brain areas surrounding the central sulcus is higher than that of brain areas far away from the central sulcus.After removing the outliers,there is no obvious difference in the response levels of different brain areas.

Drug resistant epilepsyNeurophysiological monitoringCentromedian nucleusStereoelectroencephalographyResponse in brain regions

洪婧、陈斌、范潇蒙、王楠、蔡燕青、王昌泉、徐纪文

展开 >

上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院脑病中心,上海 200020

耐药性癫痫 神经电生理监测 中央中核 立体脑电图 脑区响应

2024

中华神经外科杂志
中华医学会

中华神经外科杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.107
ISSN:1001-2346
年,卷(期):2024.40(3)
  • 15