首页|神经内镜辅助耳后问号切口大骨瓣减压术治疗急性重型创伤性硬膜下血肿的疗效分析

神经内镜辅助耳后问号切口大骨瓣减压术治疗急性重型创伤性硬膜下血肿的疗效分析

扫码查看
目的 通过与标准大骨瓣减压术比较,探讨神经内镜辅助耳后问号切口大骨瓣减压术治疗急性重型创伤性硬膜下血肿的效果.方法 回顾性分析2017年1月至2022年12月四平市中心人民医院神经外科诊治的137例急性重型创伤性硬膜下血肿患者的临床资料.所有患者均采用颅内压监护及脑室外引流.其中,采用神经内镜辅助耳后问号切口大骨瓣减压术治疗的患者作为试验组(n=77),仅采用标准大骨瓣减压术治疗的患者作为对照组(n=60).两组患者性别、年龄等基线资料的差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).比较两组患者的术后1周格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)、手术相关并发症、术后3个月格拉斯哥预后分级(GOS)、预后良好(GOS为Ⅳ、Ⅴ级)率以及病死率的差异.结果 两组患者均顺利完成手术.与对照组比较,试验组患者术后1周GCS较高[(14.33± 2.95)分对比(11.53±3.12)分],差异具有统计学意义(t=5.37,P<0.001).两组患者术中恶性脑膨出、术后出血、颅内感染、切口不愈合、癫痫、脑积水等手术相关并发症发生率的差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).术后3个月随访时,两组患者GOS的差异具有统计学意义(Z=-4.40,P<0.001);试验组患者的预后良好率高于对照组[83.1%(64/77)对比51.7%(31/60),x2=15.69,P<0.001],而病死率的差异无统计学意义[1.3%(1/77)对比8.3%(5/60),校正x2=2.48,P=0.115].结论 与标准大骨瓣减压术比较,采用神经内镜辅助耳后问号切口大骨瓣减压术治疗急性重型创伤性硬膜下血肿患者可获得更好的临床预后,且不增加手术相关并发症的发生风险.
Analysis of the efficacy of neuroendoscope-assisted postauricular question mark incision and large craniectomy in the treatment of acute severe traumatic subdural hematoma
Objective To explore the effect of neuroendoscopic-assisted postauricular question mark incision large bone flap decompression in the treatment of patients with acute severe traumatic subdural hematoma by comparing with standard large bone flap decompression.Methods The clinical data of 137 patients with acute severe traumatic subdural hematoma diagnosed and treated in the Neurosurgery Department of Siping Central People's Hospital from January 2017 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.All patients underwent intracranial pressure monitoring and external ventricular drainage.Among them,patients treated with neuroendoscopic-assisted postauricular question mark incision large craniectomy decompression were included in the experimental group(n=77),and patients treated with standard large bone flap decompression were included in the control group(n=60).There was no statistically significant difference in baseline data such as gender and age between the two groups of patients(all P>0.05).The differences in Glasgow Coma Score(GCS),surgery-related complications 1 week after surgery,Glasgow Outcome Scale(GOS),good outcome(GOS level Ⅳ and Ⅴ)rate and mortality rate 3 months after surgery were compared between the two groups.Results Both groups of patients successfully underwent the surgery.Compared with the control group,the patients in the experimental group had higher GCS 1 week after surgery[(14.33± 2.95)points vs.(11.53±3.12)points],and the difference was statistically significant(t=5.37,P<0.001).There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of surgery-related complications such as intraoperative malignant encephalocele,postoperative bleeding,intracranial infection,wound non-healing,epileptic seizures,and hydrocephalus between the two groups(all P>0.05).At the 3-month follow-up after surgery,the difference in GOS between the two groups of patients was statistically significant(Z=-4.40,P<0.001);the favorable outcome rate of patients in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group[83.1%(64/77)vs.51.7%(31/60),x2=15.69,P<0.001],while the difference in case fatality rate was not statistically significant[1.3%(1/77)vs.8.3%(5/60),correctedx2=2.48,P=0.115].Conclusion Compared with standard large bone flap decompression,neuroendoscope-assisted postauricular question mark incision large bone flap decompression in the treatment of patients with acute severe traumatic subdural hematoma can achieve better clinical outcome without increasing the risk of surgery-related complications.

Brain injuries,traumaticHematoma,subduralIntracranial pressureNeuroendos-copyTreatment outcomePostauricular question mark incision

马龙、赵慧敏、王汉宇、魏云、刘亮、杨贤瑞、赵丛海、李晓东

展开 >

四平市中心人民医院神经外科,四平 136000

吉林大学白求恩第三医院神经外科,长春 130000

脑损伤,创伤性 血肿,硬膜下 颅内压 神经内窥镜 治疗结果 耳后问号切口

2024

中华神经外科杂志
中华医学会

中华神经外科杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.107
ISSN:1001-2346
年,卷(期):2024.40(5)
  • 15