首页|经远端桡动脉入路神经介入诊疗的初步经验

经远端桡动脉入路神经介入诊疗的初步经验

扫码查看
目的 初步探讨经远端桡动脉入路(dTRA)在神经介入诊疗中的应用经验,评估其安全性及有效性.方法 回顾性分析滨州医学院附属医院神经介入外科于2023年1-8月连续收治的62例采用dTRA行神经介入诊疗患者的临床资料.术前均采用多普勒超声测量桡动脉直径.采用改良Seldinger技术穿刺桡动脉,均使用6F桡动脉鞘建立通路.术后1 d、30 d采用多普勒超声评估穿刺动脉并发症的发生情况及通畅性.观察记录dTRA行神经介入诊疗的技术成功率(穿刺针尾端喷血良好,导丝输送顺畅且动脉鞘及导管均成功到位)及穿刺相关并发症.结果 术前多普勒超声显示62例患者的前臂桡动脉直径为(2.3±0.3)mm,远端桡动脉直径为(1.8±0.3)mm.62例患者均行诊断性脑血管造影术,其中11例(17.7%)同期接受血管内治疗.技术成功率为75.8%(47/62)o失败的15例患者中,13例转为经近端桡动脉入路(pTRA),2例转为经股动脉入路;其中反复穿刺失败11例,置管失败3例,采用右侧dTRA时导管近端支撑力不足而无法到位左侧椎动脉1例.置管时间为(268.2±142.6)s.术后1 d多普勒超声均未发现前臂或远端桡动脉搏动减弱及手部缺血事件,仅1例出现穿刺点周围短暂性麻木,后自行缓解.术后30 d随访,仅1例因dTRA穿刺失败而转为pTRA的患者出现前臂疼痛,多普勒超声检查提示桡动脉中远段血栓形成.结论 采用dTRA行神经介入诊疗总体并发症少,但因其直径相对细小,存在穿刺及置管难度较大等问题,需经过一定的学习曲线以提高手术成功率.
Preliminary experience of distal transradial approach in the anatomic snuffbox for neurointe-rventional diagnosis and treatment
Objective To explore the preliminary experience of distal radial artery approach(dTRA)in neurointerventional diagnosis and treatment,and to evaluate its safety and feasibility.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 62 patients who underwent neurointerventional diagnosis and treatment with dTRA in the Department of Neurointerventional Surgery,Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University from January to August 2023.The radial artery diameter was measured by Doppler ultrasound before the procedure.The radial artery was punctured using the modified Seldinger technique,and the 6F radial artery sheath was used to establish access in all cases.Complications and patency of the punctured artery were assessed by Doppler ultrasound 1 day or 30 days after the procedure.The technical success rate of neurointerventional diagnosis and treatment via dTRA(success was defined as good blood ejection from the end of the puncture needle,smooth transmission of the guidewire,and successful placement of the arterial sheath and catheter)and puncture-related complications were observed and documented.Results Preoperative Doppler ultrasound measured the forearm radial artery diameter as 2.3±0.3 mm and the diameter of the distal radial artery as 1.8±0.3 mm.All 62 patients underwent diagnostic cerebrovascular angiography,of which 11 cases(17.7%)underwent interventional treatment during the same procedure.The success rate of neurointerventional treatment via dTRA was 75.8%(47/62),of which 13 cases were transformed to the proximal radial approach(pTRA),and 2 cases were transformed to the transfemoral artery approach.Reasons for failure included repeated puncture failure in 11 cases,sheath insertion failure in 3 cases,and failure to place the left vertebral artery in 1 case due to insufficient proximal catheter support via the right dTRA.The catheterization time was 268.2±142.6 s.Doppler ultrasound 1 day after procedure did not reveal weakened pulse in the forearm or distal radial artery or hand ischemic events,and only one case experienced transitory numbness around the puncture site,which resolved spontaneously.One patient who transformed to pTRA due to failed dTRA puncture developed forearm pain at 30-day postoperative follow-up,and Doppler ultrasound showed mid-distal radial thrombosis.Conclusion Neurointerventional treatment via dTRA is clinically safe and feasible,with few overall complications.However,due to its relatively small diameter and difficulties in puncturing and inserting sheath,a certain learning curve needs to be overcome to improve the success rate of the procedure.

Endovascular proceduresDistal transradial approachProximal transradial approachPostoperative complications

石鹏、孙超、焦玉婷、吕伟波、王超、马永刚

展开 >

滨州医学院附属医院神经介入外科,滨州 256603

滨州医学院附属医院内分泌科,滨州 256603

滨州医学院附属医院超声医学科,滨州 256603

血管内操作 经远端桡动脉入路 经近端桡动脉入路 手术后并发症

2024

中华神经外科杂志
中华医学会

中华神经外科杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.107
ISSN:1001-2346
年,卷(期):2024.40(12)