首页|基于个案管理模式的康复护理决策方案在严重烧伤患者中的应用效果

基于个案管理模式的康复护理决策方案在严重烧伤患者中的应用效果

扫码查看
目的 探讨基于个案管理模式的康复护理决策方案在严重烧伤患者中的应用效果.方法 该研究为非随机历史对照研究.将陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第一附属医院(以下简称本单位)2021年4月-2022年3月收治的符合入选标准的30例行常规康复护理的严重烧伤患者纳入常规康复护理组,其中男26例、女4例,年龄48.50(31.75,56.25)岁;将本单位2022年4月-2023年3月收治的符合入选标准的30例行个案管理康复护理的严重烧伤患者纳入个案管理康复护理组,其中男22例、女8例,年龄46.00(36.75,55.25)岁.统计2组患者住重症监护病房(ICU)天数、总住院天数、总住院费用.于入院时、康复期、出院时、伤后6个月,采用简明烧伤特定健康量表评价患者生活质量,采用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数评价患者睡眠质量,采用功能独立性评定量表评价患者功能独立性;于康复期、出院时、伤后6个月,采用温哥华瘢痕量表评价患者瘢痕情况;于伤后6个月,采用本单位第三方满意度调查问卷调查患者对疗效的满意度.结果 个案管理康复护理组患者住ICU天数、总住院天数均明显短于常规康复护理组(Z值分别为-1.97、-1.99,P<0.05),总住院费用明显少于常规康复护理组(Z=-1.99,P<0.05).出院时、伤后6个月,个案管理康复护理组患者生活质量评分均明显高于常规康复护理组(t值分别为-3.19、-4.43,P<0.05);个案管理康复护理组患者睡眠质量评分均明显低于常规康复护理组(Z值分别为-2.18、-3.33,P<0.05).2组患者入院时、康复期、出院时、伤后6个月功能独立性的认知功能评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);个案管理康复护理组患者康复期、出院时、伤后6个月功能独立性的运动功能评分和总得分均明显高于常规康复护理组(Z值分别为-4.37、-2.73、-4.10和-4.37、-2.64、-4.06,P<0.05).个案管理康复护理组患者伤后6个月瘢痕的色泽得分明显低于常规康复护理组(Z=-2.05,P<0.05),个案管理康复护理组患者出院时、伤后6个月瘢痕的血管分布得分均明显低于常规康复护理组(Z值分别为-3.16、-2.07,P<0.05),个案管理康复护理组患者康复期、出院时、伤后6个月瘢痕的柔软度得分(Z值分别为-3.16、-2.45、-4.38,P<0.05)、厚度得分(Z 值分别-2.56、-2.35、-4.70,P<0.05)及总得分(Z 值分别-3.77、-3.04、-3.13,P<0.05)均明显低于常规康复护理组.伤后6个月,个案管理康复护理组患者对疗效的满意度得分为4.00(3.00,4.25)分,明显高于常规康复护理组的3.00(2.00,4.00)分(Z=-2.72,P<0.05).结论 实施基于个案管理模式的康复护理决策方案可优化成本效益,提高临床治疗的有效性,提升严重烧伤患者的生活质量和对疗效的满意度.
Application effects of rehabilitation care decision-making scheme based on case management model in severe burn patients
Objective To explore the application effects of application of rehabilitation care decision-making scheme based on case management model in severe burn patients.Methods The study was a non-randomized historical control study.Thirty patients who met the inclusion criteria and received routine rehabilitation nursing in the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University(the Third Military Medical University,hereinafter referred to as the hospital)from April 2021 to March 2022 were included in routine rehabilitation nursing group(26 males and 4 females,aged 48.50(31.75,56.25)years),and 30 patients who met the inclusion criteria and received case management rehabilitation nursing in the hospital from April 2022 to March 2023 were included in case management rehabilitation nursing group(22 males and 8 females,aged 46.00(36.75,55.25)years).The length of intensive care unit(ICU)stay,total hospitalization day,and total hospitalization cost of the patients in two groups were recorded.At admission,convalescence,discharge,and 6 months after injury,the patients'life quality was evaluated by the concise burn specific health scale,the sleep quality was evaluated by the Pittsburgh sleep quality index,and the functional independence was evaluated by the functional independence rating scale.At convalescence,discharge,and 6 months after injury,the patients'scar status was evaluated by the Vancouver scar scale.At 6 months after injury,a third-party satisfaction questionnaire was used to investigate the efficacy satisfaction of patients.Results The length of ICU stay and total hospitalization day of patients in case management rehabilitation nursing group were both significantly shorter than those in routine rehabilitation nursing group(with Z values of-1.97 and-1.99,respectively,P<0.05),and the total hospitalization cost was less than that in routine rehabilitation nursing group(Z=-1.99,P<0.05).At discharge and 6 months after injury,the life quality scores of patients in case management rehabilitation nursing group were significantly higher than those in routine rehabilitation nursing group(with tvalues of-3.19 and-4.43,respectively,P<0.05),while the sleep quality scores were significantlylower than those in routine rehabilitation nursing group(with Z values of-2.18 and-3.33,respectively,P<0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in cognitive function scores of functional independence of patients between the 2 groups at admission,convalescence,discharge,and 6 months after injury(P>0.05).The exercise function scores and total scores of functional independence of patients in case management rehabilitation nursing group at convalescence,discharge,and 6 months after injury were significantly higher than those in routine rehabilitation nursing group(with Z values of-4.37,-2.73,-4.10,-4.37,-2.64,and-4.06,respectively,P<0.05).The scar pigmentation scores of patients in case management rehabilitation nursing group at 6 months after injury were significantly lower than those in routine rehabilitation nursing group(Z=-2.05,P<0.05),and the scar vascularity scores of patients in case management rehabilitation nursing group at discharge and 6 months after injury in case management rehabilitation nursing group were significantly lower than those in routine rehabilitation nursing group(with Z values of-3.16 and-2.07,respectively,P<0.05).The scar pliability scores(with Z values of-3.16,-2.45,and-4.38,respectively,P<0.05),thickness scores(with Z values of-2.56,-2.35,and-4.70,respectively,P<0.05),and total scores(with Z values of-3.77,-3.04,and-3.13,respectively,P<0.05)of patients in case management rehabilitation nursing group at convalescence,discharge,and 6 months after injury were significantly lower than those in routine rehabilitation nursing group.At 6 months after injury,the efficacy satisfaction scores of patients in case management rehabilitation nursing group were 4.00(3.00,4.25),which were significantly higher than 3.00(2.00,4.00)in routine rehabilitation nursing group(Z=-2.72,P<0.05).Conclusions The implementation of rehabilitation care decision-making scheme based on case management model can optimize the cost efficiency,improve the effectiveness of clinical treatment,and enhance the life quality and satisfaction of the curative effect of severe burn patients.

BurnsCase managersRehabilitation nursingNursing administration researchNursing decision

黎宁、付青青、罗月、李茂君、陈华玲、廖建梅

展开 >

陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第一附属医院全军烧伤研究所,创伤与化学中毒全国重点实验室,重庆 400038

陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)第一附属医院护理处,重庆 400038

烧伤 个案管理师 康复护理 护理管理研究 护理决策

军队护理创新与培育专项计划

2021HL008

2024

中华烧伤与创面修复杂志
中华医学会

中华烧伤与创面修复杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.185
ISSN:1009-2587
年,卷(期):2024.40(1)
  • 1
  • 8