首页|改良型富血小板纤维蛋白/壳聚糖温敏水凝胶对糖尿病大鼠全层皮肤缺损创面愈合的影响

改良型富血小板纤维蛋白/壳聚糖温敏水凝胶对糖尿病大鼠全层皮肤缺损创面愈合的影响

扫码查看
目的 制备改良型富血小板纤维蛋白(A-PRF)/壳聚糖温敏水凝胶(以下简称复合水凝胶)并探讨复合水凝胶对糖尿病大鼠全层皮肤缺损创面愈合的作用.方法 该研究为实验研究.成功制备具有多孔网状结构及温敏特性的含质量浓度为10、15、20、50、100g/LA-PRF的复合水凝胶.取6~8周龄雄性SD大鼠,通过腹腔注射链脲佐菌素成功制造糖尿病大鼠模型,并在每只大鼠背部制造4个全层皮肤缺损创面(最终36只大鼠成功造模).将每只大鼠3个创面分别作为空白组(不进行药物干预)、阳性对照组(滴加重组人粒细胞巨噬细胞刺激因子凝胶)、壳聚糖水凝胶组(滴加壳聚糖水凝胶溶液).取其中30只大鼠,将每只大鼠剩余的1个创面共30个创面分为10、15、20、50、100g/L复合水凝胶组,每组6个创面,分别滴加含10、15、20、50、100 g/L A-PRF的复合水凝胶溶液;取剩余6只大鼠,于每只大鼠剩余的1个创面滴加含100 g/LA-PRF的复合水凝胶溶液.伤后14 d,取其中1个创面滴加含100 g/L A-PRF的复合水凝胶溶液的6只大鼠,行苏木精-伊红(HE)染色,观察大鼠心、肝、脾、肺和肾等炎症、出血或坏死情况;伤后10d,取其中1个创面滴加含15 g/LA-PRF的复合水凝胶溶液的6只大鼠,采用激光血流成像系统观测4组创面血流灌注量(样本数为6).伤后7、14d,计算8组创面愈合率.伤后14 d,取8组创面组织,分别行HE、Masson染色,观察新生上皮形成和胶原生成情况;采用免疫组织化学法检测CD31、血管内皮生长因子A(VEGFA)的阳性表达情况并计算阳性面积百分比;采用蛋白质印迹法检测CD31、VEGFA的蛋白表达;采用实时荧光定量反转录PCR法检测CD31、VEGFA的mRNA表达(样本数均为4).结果 伤后14d,6只大鼠心、肝、脾、肺、肾中均未观察到明显的炎症、出血或坏死.伤后10d,15 g/L复合水凝胶组创面血流灌注量明显多于空白组、阳性对照组、壳聚糖水凝胶组(P值均<0.05).伤后7、14d,空白组创面愈合率分别为(26.0±8.9)%、(75.0± 1.8)%,均分别明显低于阳性对照组、壳聚糖水凝胶组及10、15、20、50、100g/L复合水凝胶组的(45.8± 3.2)%、(49.8±3.7)%、(51.2±2.9)%、(68.5±2.4)%、(68.8±1.5)%、(72.7±2.1)%、(75.0±3.7)%及(79.1± 1.9)%、(77.2±1.7)%、(82.3±1.3)%、(89.6±1.9)%、(89.8±1.3)%、(87.3±1.1)%、(87.9±1.3)%(P<0.05);阳性对照组、壳聚糖水凝组、10 g/L复合水凝胶组创面愈合率均明显低于15、20、50、100 g/L复合水凝胶组(P<0.05).伤后14 d,15、20、50、100 g/L复合水凝胶组创面上皮化程度较其他4组创面更高、新生微血管情况更好,胶原数量更多且排列更整齐.伤后14d,阳性对照组创面CD31、VEGFA及壳聚糖水凝胶组创面VEGFA阳性面积百分比均明显高于空白组(P<0.05),10 g/L复合水凝胶组创面VEGFA阳性面积百分比明显高于空白组、壳聚糖水凝胶组、阳性对照组(P值均<0.05),15、20、50、100 g/L复合水凝胶组创面CD31、VEGFA阳性面积百分比均明显高于空白组、阳性对照组、壳聚糖水凝胶组、10 g/L复合水凝胶组(P<0.05).伤后14 d,壳聚糖水凝胶组、阳性对照组、10g/L复合水凝胶组创面组织中CD31、VEGFA蛋白和mRNA表达均明显高于空白组(P<0.05),10 g/L复合水凝胶组创面组织中VEGFA蛋白表达明显高于阳性对照组(P<0.05)和CD31、VEGFA mRNA表达均明显高于阳性对照组、壳聚糖水凝胶组(P<0.05),15、20、50、100g/L复合水凝胶组创面组织中CD31、VEGFA蛋白和mRNA表达均明显高于空白组、阳性对照组、壳聚糖水凝胶组、10 g/L复合水凝胶组(P<0.05),壳聚糖水凝胶组创面组织中CD31、VEGFA的mRNA表达均明显低于阳性对照组(P<0.05).结论 复合水凝胶生物安全性高,可改善创面血流灌注,有效促进创面组织中血管和胶原生成,从而促进糖尿病大鼠全层皮肤缺损创面愈合;15 g/L为复合水凝胶中A-PRF的较优使用质量浓度.
Effects of advanced platelet-rich fibrin/chitosan thermosensitive hydrogel on full-thickness skin defect wound healing in diabetic rats
Objective To prepare advanced platelet-rich fibrin(A-PRF)/chitosan thermosensitive hydrogel(hereinafter referred to as composite hydrogel)and explore the effects of composite hydrogel on full-thickness skin defect wound healing in diabetic rats.Methods This study was an experimental study.The composite hydrogel with porous mesh structure and thermosensitive characteristics was successfully prepared,containing A-PRF with mass concentrations of 10,15,20,50,and 100 g/L.Diabetic model was successfully established in male Sprague-Dawley rats aged 6-8 weeks by intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin,and 4 full-thickness skin defect wounds were established on the back of each rat(finally the model was successfully established in 36 rats).Three wounds of each rat were divided into blank group(no drug intervention),positive control group(dropping recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage stimulating factor gel),and chitosan hydrogel group(dropping chitosan hydrogel solution).Thirty rats were collected,and the remaining one wound of each rat(totally 30 wounds)was divided into 10,15,20,50,and 100 g/L composite hydrogel groups,with 6 wounds in each group,which were dropped with composite hydrogel solution containing 10,15,20,50,and 100 g/L A-PRF,respectively.Taking the remaining six rats,the remaining one wound from each rat was dropped with composite hydrogel solution containing 100 g/L A-PRF.On 14 d after injury,6 rats with one wound dropped with composite hydrogel containing 100 g/L A-PRF were selected for hematoxylin-eosin(HE)staining to observe the inflammation,hemorrhage,or necrosis of the heart,liver,spleen,lung,and kidney.On 10 d after injury,6 rats with one wound dropped with composite hydrogel containing 15 g/L A-PRF were selected to observe the blood perfusion of wounds in the four groups(with sample size of 6).On 7 and 14 d after injury,the wound healing rates in the eight groups were calculated.On 14 d after injury,the wound tissue in the eight groups was taken for HE and Masson staining to observe the formation of new epithelium and collagen formation,respectively;the positive expressions of CD31 and vascular endothelial growth factor A(VEGFA)were detected by immunohistochemistry,and the percentages of positive areas were calculated;the protein expressions of CD31 and VEGFA were detected by Western blotting;the mRNA expressions of CD31 and VEGFA were detected by real-time fluorescent quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction method(with all sample sizes of 4).Results On 14 d after injury,no obvious inflammation,hemorrhage,or necrosis was observed in the heart,liver,spleen,lung,and kidney in the 6 rats.On 10 d after injury,the blood perfusion volume of wound in 15 g/L composite hydrogel group was significantly more than that in blank group,positive control group,and chitosan hydrogel group,respectively(with P values all<0.05).On 7 and 14 d after injury,the wound healing rates of blank group were(26.0±8.9)%and(75.0±1.8)%,which were significantly lower than those of positive control group,chitosan hydrogel group,and 10,15,20,50,and 100 g/L composite hydrogel groups,respectively((45.8±3.2)%,(49.8±3.7)%,(51.2±2.9)%,(68.5±2.4)%,(68.8±1.5)%,(72.7±2.1)%,(75.0±3.7)%and(79.1±1.9)%,(77.2±1.7)%,(82.3±1.3)%,(89.6±1.9)%,(89.8±1.3)%,(87.3±1.1)%,(87.9±1.3)%),P<0.05;the wound healing rates of positive control group,chitosan hydrogel group,and 10 g/L composite hydrogel group were significantly lower than those of 15,20,50,and 100 g/L composite hydrogel groups(P<0.05).On 14 d after injury,the wound epithelialization degrees of 15,20,50,and 100 g/L composite hydrogel groups were higher than those of the other 4 groups,the new microvascular situation was better,and the collagen was more abundant and arranged more neatly.On 14 d after injury,the percentages of CD31 and VEGFA positive areas in wounds in positive control group and the percentage of VEGFA positive area in wounds in chitosan hydrogel group were significantly higher than those in blank group(P<0.05),the percentage of VEGFA positive area in wounds in 10 g/L composite hydrogel group was significantly higher than that in blank group,chitosan hydrogel group,and positive control group(with P values all<0.05),and the percentages of CD31 and VEGFA positive areas in wounds in 15,20,50,and 100 g/L composite hydrogel groups were significantly higher than those in blank group,positive control group,chitosan hydrogel group,and 10 g/L composite hydrogel group(P<0.05).On 14 d after injury,the protein and mRNA expressions of CD31 and VEGFA in wound tissue in chitosan hydrogel group,positive control group,and 10 g/L composite hydrogel group were significantly higher than those in blank group(P<0.05);the protein expression of VEGFA in wound tissue in 10 g/L composite hydrogel group was significantly higher than that in positive control group(P<0.05),and the mRNA expressions of CD31 and VEGFA in wound tissue in 10 g/L composite hydrogel group were significantly higher than those in positive control group and chitosan hydrogel group(P<0.05);the protein and mRNA expressions of CD31 and VEGFA in wound tissue in 15,20,50,and 100 g/L composite hydrogel groups were significantly higher than those in blank group,positive control group,chitosan hydrogel group,and 10 g/L composite hydrogel group(P<0.05);the mRNA expressions of CD31 and VEGFA in wound tissue in chitosan hydrogel group were significantly lower than those in positive control group(P<0.05).Conclusions The composite hydrogel has high biological safety,can improve wound blood perfusion,effectively promote the formation of blood vessels and collagen in wound tissue,thus promoting the wound healing of full-thickness skin defects in diabetic rats.15 g/L is the optimal mass concentration of A-PRF in composite hydrogel.

Biocompatible materialsHydrogelDiabetes mellitusWound repairAdvanced platelet-rich fibrin

荀浩怡、苏小薇、胡方超、刘翔宇、吴育寿、刘甜、孙冉、段红杰、迟云飞、柴家科

展开 >

解放军总医院研究生院,北京 100853

解放军总医院第四医学中心全军烧伤研究所,北京 100048

河北北方学院,张家口 075132

生物相容性材料 水凝胶 糖尿病 创面修复 改良型富血小板纤维蛋白

国家自然科学基金面上项目北京市自然科学基金面上项目

817720677222179

2024

中华烧伤与创面修复杂志
中华医学会

中华烧伤与创面修复杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.185
ISSN:1009-2587
年,卷(期):2024.40(5)
  • 30