首页|经造口顺行灌肠改善低位直肠癌经括约肌间切除术后排便功能的临床研究

经造口顺行灌肠改善低位直肠癌经括约肌间切除术后排便功能的临床研究

扫码查看
目的 探讨含益生菌溶剂经回肠造口顺行灌肠对低位直肠癌行经括约肌间切除术(ISR)并回肠造口手术患者术后肛门及肠道功能的影响。方法 分析2018年1月至2022年12月武汉大学中南医院结直肠肛门外科收治的85例因低位直肠癌行ISR并回肠造口手术患者临床资料和随访信息,其中未灌肠组60例,含益生菌溶剂顺行灌肠组25例,比较两组患者基线资料与临床指标,通过问卷量表,直肠肛门测压,肠镜等评估患者术后肛门及肠道功能等情况。采用独立样本t检验,Wilcoxon秩和检验,x2检验或连续校正的x2检验比较两组患者临床疗效。结果 含益生菌溶剂顺行灌肠组在造口还纳术后1、3、6个月Wexner失禁评分、低位前切除综合征评分(LARS)、6个月梅奥内镜评分(MES)、还纳术后首次排气、排便时间、并发症发生率低于非灌肠组[(11。60±1。97)分比(13。23±3。47)分、(9。40±2。50)分 比(11。17±3。65)分、(7。08±1。75)分 比(9。38±2。58)分,t=2。730、2。207、4。757,P<0。05,Z=-2。145、-2。519、-2。165,P<0。05;Z=-3。332,P<0。05;(36。12±13。56)h 比(57。67±16。60)h、(41。88±16。06)h 比(60。15±16。64)h、8%(2/25)比31。7%(19/60),t=5。735、4。657,x2=4。117,P<0。05],在还纳术后1、3、6个月大便失禁生活质量评分(FIQL)高于非灌肠组,Lifestyle/生活方式[(1。69±0。20)分比(1。36±0。21)分、(2。06±0。22)分比(1。77±0。24)分、(2。34±0。25)分比(2。01±0。31)分,t=-6。498、-5。317、-4。744,P<0。05]、Coping/心理应对[(1。67±0。26)分比(1。49±0。27)分、(1。90±0。35)分比(1。73±0。33)分、(2。38±0。35)分 比(2。15±0。37)分,t=-2。715、-2。056、-2。585,P<0。05]、Depression/抑郁[(2。19±0。34)分比(1。81±0。31)分、(2。37±0。47)分 比(2。04±0。50)分、(3。09±0。36)分比(2。76±0。64)分,t=-5。048、-2。827、-2。902,P<0。05]、Embarrassment/社交窘迫[(2。15± 0。66)分 比(1。76±0。55)分、(2。31±0。75)分 比(1。95±0。64)分、(2。61±0。76)分 比(2。22± 0。67)分,t=-2。788、-2。264、-2。284,P<0。05],两组在还纳术后3、6个月肛管静息压(ARP)、肛管最大收缩压(MSP)、直肠最大容积(MTV)、直肠顺应性(RC)差异无统计学意义[(30。07±6。17)mmHg比(26。54±4。34)mmHg、(33。46±6。22)mmHg 比(29。33±4。70)mmHg,(97。13±8。23)mmHg 比(90。84±12。07)mmHg、(105。63±8。12)mmHg 比(100。67±13。09)mmHg,(56。50±6。39)ml 比(59。50±8。01)ml、(62。30±6。48)ml 比(63。30±7。90)ml,(5。72±1。27)ml/mmHg 比(5。65± 1。15)ml/mmHg、(8。20±1。52)ml/mmHg 比(7。81±1。54)ml/mmHg,t=-1。478、-1。675、-1。361、-1。018、0。925、0。309、-0。128、-0。568,P>0。05]。结论 通过含益生菌溶剂经回肠造口顺行灌肠可以一定程度改善ISR患者术后肠道功能及排便症状,改善患者生活质量,加快患者术后肠道恢复情况。
A clinical study of anterograde lavage via temporary loopileostomy to improve bowel function after intersphincterectomy for low rectal cancer
Objective To explore the postoperative anal function and bowel function in patients undergoing intersphincteric resection(ISR)with ileostomy for low rectal cancer with a probiotic enema by anterograde lavage.Methods The clinical data of 85 patients who underwent ISR and ileostomy for low rectal cancer in the Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery of Wuhan University Zhongnan Hospital from January 2018 to December 2022 were selected.The patients were divided into the probiotic enema by anter-ograde lavage group or non-enema group,and the baseline data and clinical indicators of the two groups were compared.The postoperative complications,anal function,and bowel function at 1st,3rd,and 6th month after surgery were evaluated through questionnaires and clinical data.The independent sample t-tests,Wilcoxon rank sum tests,chi-square tests,or chi-square tests with continuity correction were used to compare the clinical efficacy of the two groups.Results The probiotic lavage group had lower Wexner scores,anterior resection syndrome scores(LARS scores),and Mayo endoscopic subscore(Mayo scores)at 1st,3rd,and 6th months after stoma reversal,as well as shorter first exhaust and defecation time and a lower complication rate than the non-lavage group[(11.60±1.97)vs.(13.23±3.47),(9.40±2.50)vs.(11.17±3.65),(7.08±1.75)vs.(9.38±2.58),t=2.730,2.207,4.757,P<0.05;Z=-2.145,-2.519,-2.165,P<0.05;Z=-3.332,P<0.05,(36.12±13.56)h vs.(57.67± 16.60)h,(41.88±16.06)h vs.(60.15±16.64)h,8%(2/25)vs.31.7%(19/60),t=5.735,4.657,4.117,P<0.05].The probiotic lavage group also had higher fecal incontinence quality of life scores(FIQL scores)at 1st,3rd,and 6th month after stoma reversal than the non-lavage group:Lifestyle[(1.69±0.20)vs.(1.36±0.21),(2.06±0.22)vs.(1.77±0.24),(2.34±0.25)vs.(2.01± 0.31),t=-6.498,-5.317,-4.744,P<0.05],Coping[(1.67±0.26)vs.(1.49±0.27),(1.90±0.35)vs.(1.73±0.33),(2.38±0.35)vs.(2.15±0.37),t=-2.715,-2.056,-2.585,P<0.05],Depression[(2.19±0.34)vs.(1.81±0.31),(2.37±0.47)vs.(2.04±0.50),(3.09± 0.36)vs.(2.76±0.64),t=-5.048,-2.827,-2.902,P<0.05],Embarrassment[(2.15±0.66)vs.(1.76±0.55),(2.31±0.75)vs.(1.95±0.64),(2.61±0.76)vs.(2.22±0.67),t=-2.788,-2.264,-2.284,P<0.05].There was no significant difference in anal resting pressure(ARP),maxi-mum squeeze pressure(MSP),maximum tolerance volume(MTV),or rectal compliance(RC)between the two groups at 3rd and 6th month after stoma reversal[(30.07±6.17)mmHg vs.(26.54±4.34)mmHg,(33.46±6.22)mmHg vs.(29.33±4.70)mmHg;(97.13±8.23)mmHg vs.(90.84±12.07)mmHg,(105.63±8.12)mmHg vs.(100.67±13.09)mmHg;(56.50±6.39)ml vs.(59.50±8.01)ml,(62.3± 6.48)ml vs.(63.30±7.90)ml;(5.72±1.27)ml/mmHg vs.(5.65±1.15)ml/mmHg,(8.20± 1.52)ml/mmHg vs.(7.81±1.54)ml/mmHg,t=-1.478,-1.675,-1.361,-1.018,0.925,0.309,-0.128,-0.568,P>0.05].Conclusion Anterograde lavage via temporary loop ileostomy with probiotic enema can improve the postoperative bowel function and defecation symptoms of ISR patients to a certain ex-tent,enhance the patient's quality of life,and accelerate the patients'postoperative intestinal recovery.

Low anterior resection syndromeIntersphincteric resectionAnterograde lavageProbiotics

胡恒、吴超、田顺化、陈保祥、翟祥、任相海、江从庆

展开 >

武汉大学中南医院结直肠肛门外科,武汉 430071

武汉协和江北医院肛肠外科,武汉 430100

湖北民族大学附属民大医院胃肠外科,恩施 450001

低位前切除术综合征 经括约肌间切除术 顺行灌肠 益生菌

国家自然科学基金

82172845

2024

中华实验外科杂志
中华医学会

中华实验外科杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.759
ISSN:1001-9030
年,卷(期):2024.41(3)
  • 9