首页|联合技术治疗胫骨创伤性骨缺损的效果及对患者血管内皮生长因子和炎性因子的影响

联合技术治疗胫骨创伤性骨缺损的效果及对患者血管内皮生长因子和炎性因子的影响

扫码查看
目的 探讨Ilizarov骨搬移配合髓内引导针技术治疗胫骨创伤性骨缺损的效果及对患者血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)和炎性因子的影响。方法 选取2021年6月至2023年6月山东省立第三医院收治的70例胫骨创伤性骨缺损患者作为研究对象,根据手术方式不同,将患者分为对照组和联合治疗组,对照组采用传统手术方式进行治疗,联合治疗组患者采用Ilizarov骨搬移配合髓内引导针技术进行治疗。术后分别分析对照组和联合治疗组患者骨延长区矿化时间、骨愈合时间、疼痛模拟评分以及带架时间等指标。并分析骨折部位VEGF和炎性因子[肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)]表达水平。计量数据比较采用t检验,计数资料比较采用卡方检验。结果 对照组患者骨延长区矿化时间、骨愈合时间和带架时间[(242。85±17。10)、(15。80±1。95)、(12。63±1。63)d]明显高于联合治疗组患者[(202。94±16。21)、(12。09±1。70)、(9。26±2。08)d],差异有统计学意义(t=10。020、8。479、7。557,P<0。05)。对照组患者疼痛模拟评分[(4。40± 1。12)分]明显高于联合治疗组患者评分[(2。83±0。92)分],差异有统计学意义(t=6。417,P<0。05)。联合治疗组患者治疗优良率85。71%明显高于对照组71。43%,差异有统计学意义(x2=12。014,P<0。05)。对照组患者血清外周血VEGF水平[(151。67±21。60)ng/L]明显低于联合治疗组患者[(371。65±29。43)ng/L],差异有统计学意义(t=23。340,P<0。05)。对照组患者骨缺损部分组织VEGF mRNA表达水平(1。06±0。14)明显低于联合治疗组(2。45±0。38),差异有统计学意义(t=13。120,P<0。05)。对照组患者血清外周血 TNF-α 和 IL-6 水平[(66。87±10。59)、(84。47± 7。62)pg/ml]明显低于联合治疗组患者[(38。13±4。90)、(38。87±9。25)pg/ml],差异有统计学意义(t=9。539、14。730,P<0。05)。对照组患者骨缺损部分组织TNF-α和IL-6 mRNA表达水平(1。04±0。15、0。93±0。16)明显低于联合治疗组(2。02±0。22、2。21±0。35),差异有统计学意义(t=14。200、12。910,P<0。05)。结论 Ilizarov骨搬移配合髓内引导针技术可显著改善胫骨创伤性骨缺损部位微环境,对胫骨创伤性骨缺损具有较好的治疗效果,可以最大限度恢复患者肢体功能。
Effect of combined technology in treating tibial traumatic bone defects and its impact on vascular endothelial growth factor and inflammatory factors in patients
Objective To investigate the effect of Ilizarov bone transfer combined with intramedul-lary guided needle technique in the treatment of traumatic bone defects in the tibia,as well as its impact on vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)and inflammatory factors in patients.Methods A total of 70 patients with tibial traumatic bone defects admitted to our hospital from June 2021 to June 2023 were se-lected as the research subjects.According to the surgical methods,the patients were divided into a control group and a combination treatment group.The control group was treated with traditional surgical methods,and the combination treatment group was treated with Ilizarov bone transfer combined with intramedullary guided needle technology.After surgery,the mineralization time,bone healing time,pain visual analogue scale and scaffolding time in the bone extension area of the control group and the combined treatment group were analyzed.The expression levels of the VEGF and inflammatory factors[tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α)and interleukin-6(IL-6)]at the fracture site were analyzed by enzyme linked immunosorbent as-say(ELISA)and fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction(PCR).The t-test was used for the comparison of measurement data,and the Chi-square test was used for the comparison of count data.Results The mineralization time,bone healing time,and scaffolding time in the bone extension area of the control group[(242.85±17.10),(15.80±1.95),(12.63±1.63)d]were significantly longer than those in the combination treatment group[(202.94±16.21),(12.09±1.70),(9.26±2.08)d,t=0.020,8.479,7.557,P<0.05].The pain simulation score in the control group(4.40±1.12)was sig-nificantly higher than that in the combined treatment group(2.83±0.92,t=6.417,P<0.05).The ex-cellent and good treatment rate of 85.71%in the combination treatment group was significantly higher than that of 71.43%in the control group(x2=12.014,P<0.05).The serum peripheral blood VEGF levels in the control group[(151.67±21.60)ng/L]were significantly lower than those in the combination treat-ment group[(371.65±29.43)ng/L,t=23.340,P<0.05].The expression level of VEGF mRNA in the bone defect tissue of the control group(1.06±0.14)was significantly lower than that of the combina-tion treatment group(2.45±0.38,t=13.120,P<0.05).The levels of serum TNF-α and IL-6 in the control group[(66.87±10.59),(84.47±7.62)pg/ml]were significantly lower than those in the combi-nation therapy group[(38.13±4.90),(38.87±9.25)pg/ml,t=9.539,14.730,P<0.05].The ex-pression level of TNF-α and IL-6 mRNA in bone defect tissue of control group(1.04±0.15,0.93±0.16)was significantly lower than that of the combination therapy group(2.02±0.22,2.21±0.35,t=14.200,12.910,P<0.05).Conclusion Ilizarov bone transfer combined with intramedullary guided needle tech-nology can significantly improve the microenvironment of tibial traumatic bone defects,and has a good ther-apeutic effect on tibial traumatic bone defects.It can maximize the recovery of patient limb function.

Traumatic bone defect of the tibiaVascular endothelial growth factorInflamma-tory factors

张娜、房龙、刘霞、尹双双

展开 >

山东省立第三医院骨外科,济南 250031

山东省立第三医院泌尿外科,济南 250031

胫骨创伤性骨缺损 血管内皮生长因子 炎性因子

2024

中华实验外科杂志
中华医学会

中华实验外科杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.759
ISSN:1001-9030
年,卷(期):2024.41(3)
  • 11