首页|肝癌中浆细胞标志基因对索拉非尼敏感性影响的临床研究

肝癌中浆细胞标志基因对索拉非尼敏感性影响的临床研究

扫码查看
目的 基于浆细胞标志基因构建肝细胞癌(HCC)预后风险模型并计算风险评分,探讨浆细胞标志基因对HCC患者预后及索拉非尼治疗敏感性的影响.方法 通过"Seurat"、"DoubletFinder"和"Harmony"等R包分析单细胞RNA测序数据,解析HCC免疫微环境细胞浸润图谱;利用CIBERSORT反卷积算法评估浆细胞在肝癌研究所(LCI)队列和癌症基因组图谱肝细胞癌(TCGA-LIHC)队列的浸润情况;通过单因素Cox-套索算法(LASSO)-多因素Cox构建基于浆细胞标志基因的预后风险模型.使用Oncopredict算法评估预后风险评分及浆细胞标志基因对索拉非尼敏感性的影响.Wilcoxon检验用于组间差异分析,Kaplan-Meier和Log-rank检验用于生存分析,皮尔森相关系数用于衡量两变量的相关性.结果 浆细胞高浸润在LCI队列[风险比(HR)=1.68,95%置信区间(CI):1.09~2.61,P<0.05]和 TCGA-LIHC 队列[HR=1.64,95%CI:1.58~3.25,P<0.05]中均显示与HCC不良预后有关;与低风险组患者比较,高风险组患者的总生存期较差[HR=2.27,95%CI:1.58~3.25,P<0.01],但高风险组患者索拉非尼半抑制浓度(IC50)低于低风险组患者[12.87(3.11,43.27)比 15.135(7.58,32.97),U=10 324,P<0.01],对索拉非尼治疗更敏感;浆细胞标志基因的表达与索拉非尼IC50负相关[SEC61A1(R=-0.30,P<0.01);DNAJC1(R=-0.22,P<0.01);EIF5B(R=-0.17,P<0.01);DNAJB4(R=-0.22,P<0.01);ST6GALNAC4(R=-0.29,P<0.01);CCDC88A(R=-0.42,P<0.01)],且 SEC61A1、ST6GALNAC4 和 CCDC88A 与索拉非尼IC50的相关性优于常用的索拉非尼疗效预测标志基因MAPK1、MAPK3和KDR(-0.30、-0.29、-0.42比-0.27、-0.21、-0.20).结论 HCC中浆细胞标志基因的表达与索拉非尼敏感性呈正相关,可作为预测索拉非尼反应的生物标志物.
Clinical study on the influence of plasma cell marker genes on sorafenib sensitivity in hepatocellular carcinoma
Objective To construct a prognostic risk model of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)based on signature genes of plasma cells and investigate the influence of risk score and signature genes of plasma cells on the prognosis of HCC patients and their sensitivity to sorafenib treatment.Methods The landscape of HCC was revealed through single-cell RNA sequencing,using Seurat,DoubletFinder and Har-mony R packages.Plasma cells infiltration in the liver cancer institute(LCI)and the cancer genome atlas-liver hepatocellular carcinoma(TCGA-LIHC)cohorts was assessed using the CIBERSORT deconvolution algorithm.Signature genes of plasma cells was identified through single-cell RNA sequencing,and subse-quently a prognostic risk model was constructed through univariate Cox-least absolute shrinkage and selec-tion operator(LASSO)-multivariate Cox analysis.The Oncopredict algorithm was utilized to evaluate the effect of prognostic risk score and signature genes of plasma cells on sorafenib sensitivity.Wilcoxon test was employed to compare significance between different groups,Kaplan-Meier and Log-rank tests were em-ployed for survival analysis and Pearson correlation coefficient was used to measure the correlation between two variables.Results High plasma cells infiltration was associated with adverse prognosis in both LCI co-hort[hazard ratio(HR)=1.684,95%confidence interval(CI):1.09-2.61,P<0.05]and TCGA-LIHC cohort[HR=1.64,95%CI:1.58-3.25,P<0.05].Compared to low-risk patients,those in the high-risk group exhibited poorer overall survival(OS)[HR=2.27,95%CI:1.58-3.25,P<0.01].However,patients in the high-risk group exhibited lower 50%inhibitory concentration(IC50)of sorafenib[12.87(3.11,43.27)vs.15.135(7.58,32.97),U=10 324,P<0.01],indicating increased sensitivity to sor-afenib treatment.The expression of plasma cells signature genes was negatively correlated with sorafenib IC50[SEC61A1(R=-0.30,P<0.01);DNAJC1(R=-0.22,P<0.01);EIF5B(R=-0.17,P<0.01);DNAJB4(R=-0.22,P<0.01);ST6GALNAC4(R=-0.29,P<0.01);CCDC88A(R=-0.42,P<0.01)],and the correlation of SEC61 A1,ST6GALNAC4 and CCDC88A with sorafenib IC50 was stronger than that of commonly used sorafenib response prediction markers MAPK1,MAPK3 and KDR with sorafenib IC50(-0.30,-0.29,-0.42 vs.-0.27,-0.21,-0.20).Conclusion The expression of signature genes of plasma cells is positively correlated with sorafenib sensitivity in HCC,suggesting their potential as biomar-kers predicting sorafenib response in clinic.

SorafenibDrug sensitivityHepatocellular carcinomaSingle-cell RNA sequen-cing

李元杞、蒋敬庭、周游

展开 >

苏州大学附属第三医院肿瘤生物诊疗中心,江苏省肿瘤免疫治疗工程技术研究中心,苏州大学细胞治疗研究院,常州 213003

索拉非尼 药物敏感性 肝细胞癌 单细胞RNA测序

国家自然科学基金江苏省高等学校基础科学(自然科学)研究面上项目常州市卫生健康委重大科技项目

3170111123KJB310024ZD202203

2024

中华实验外科杂志
中华医学会

中华实验外科杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.759
ISSN:1001-9030
年,卷(期):2024.41(4)
  • 5