首页|双硫仑/铜复合物联合多柔比星对人肝癌细胞HepG2增殖和凋亡的影响

双硫仑/铜复合物联合多柔比星对人肝癌细胞HepG2增殖和凋亡的影响

扫码查看
目的 检测双硫仑/铜复合物(DSF/Cu)联合多柔比星对人肝癌细胞HepG2增殖和凋亡的影响并探讨其作用机制。方法 以浓度5。000、2。500、1。250、0。625、0。313、0。156、0。078、0。039、0。019、0。009 μmol/L的多柔比星及相同浓度梯度的DSF/Cu(Cu2+固定浓度1 µmol/L)分别处理HepG2细胞,噻唑蓝(MTT)法计算多柔比星和DSF/Cu对HepG2细胞的半抑制浓度(IC50)。以上述浓度梯度的多柔比星单独及联合0。15 μmol/L的DSF/Cu处理HepG2细胞,MTT法分析单用多柔比星及联合DSF/Cu对HepG2细胞增殖的影响,CompuSyn软件计算两药作用的联合指数(CI)。将HepG2肝癌细胞分为未处理组(不添加任何药物)、二甲基亚砜(DMSO)处理组(仅加入与DSF/Cu处理组等量的DMSO)、DSF/Cu处理组(IC50浓度的DSF/Cu处理)、多柔比星处理组(IC50浓度的多柔比星处理)、多柔比星+DSF/Cu处理组(IC50浓度的多柔比星及DSF/Cu联合处理),以流式细胞技术检测各组HepG2肝癌细胞中ALDH+细胞数量的改变,干细胞成球实验检测各组HepG2肝癌细胞成瘤性的改变,蛋白质印迹法(Western blot)检测各组HepG2肝癌细胞中人表皮生长因子受体2(Her-2)、性别决定区Y框蛋白9(SOX9)、c-Myc、LC3-Ⅱ/Ⅰ和裂解的聚腺苷二磷酸核糖聚合酶(cleaved PARP)蛋白的表达。组间两两比较采用配对样本t检验,组间多个均数比较采用单因素方差分析。结果 多柔比星和DSF/Cu对HepG2肝癌细胞作用48 h的IC50分别为0。8698、0。553 8 µmol/L。多柔比星联合0。15 μmol/L的DSF/Cu对HepG2肝癌细胞的增殖抑制作用明显强于单用多柔比星(t=8。930,P<0。01),CompuSyn分析显示多柔比星联合DSF/Cu对HepG2肝癌细胞的增殖抑制呈协同作用(CI<1)。流式细胞分析显示,DSF/Cu处理组[(0。886±0。082)×105]和多柔比星处理组[(1。374±0。041)× 105]HepG2肝癌细胞中ALDH+细胞数量低于未处理组[(1。859±0。979)× 105],差异有统计学意义(t=10。800、6。444,P<0。05)。多柔比星+DSF/Cu 处理组[(0。306±0。122)×105]HepG2肝癌细胞中ALDH+细胞数量明显低于DSF/Cu处理组和多柔比星处理组,差异有统计学意义(t=5。590、11。730,P<0。01)。干细胞成球实验显示,DSF/Cu处理组(2。167±1。169)和多柔比星处理组(21。170±4。875)中HepG2肝癌干细胞球体数量少于未处理组(46。500±5。357),差异有统计学意义(t=19。800、8。567,P<0。05)。多柔比星+DSF/Cu处理组(0。833±0。753)中HepG2肝癌干细胞球体数量少于多柔比星处理组(21。170±4。875),差异有统计学意义(t=10。100,P<0。01)。而与DSF/Cu处理组(2。167±1。169)比较,多柔比星+DSF/Cu处理组(0。833±0。753)干细胞球体数量差异无统计学意义(t=2。349,P>0。05)。Western blot结果显示,DSF/Cu处理组和多柔比星+DSF/Cu处理组HepG2肝癌细胞中Her-2、SOX9、c-Myc蛋白的表达低于未处理组(0。132±0。013 比 0。049±0。010 比 0。950±0。052、0。325±0。049 比 0。311±0。038 比0。922±0。027、0。308±0。041 比 0。235±0。027 比 0。816±0。092,F=412。50、113。20、47。54,P<0。05),而 LC3-Ⅱ/Ⅰ 和 Cleaved PARP 蛋白表达高于未处理组(1。527±0。201 比 2。629±0。224 比0。766±0。159、0。906±0。083 比 0。834±0。058 比 0。039±0。001,F=35。15、170。40,P<0。05)。多柔比星处理组HepG2肝癌细胞中Her-2和SOX9蛋白的表达低于未处理组(0。275±0。018比0。950±0。052、0。535±0。034 比 0。922±0。027,t=17。440、12。680,P<0。05),但 c-Myc、LC3-Ⅱ/Ⅰ 和 Cleaved PARP蛋白的表达与未处理组比较差异无统计学意义(0。914±0。097比0。816±0。092、1。329±0。152 比 0。766±0。159、0。063±0。017 比 0。039±0。001,t=1。042、4。205、2。061,P>0。05)。多柔比星+DSF/Cu处理组中c-Myc、Her-2和SOX9蛋白的表达低于多柔比星处理组(0。235±0。027比0。914±0。097、0。049±0。010 比 0。275±0。018、0。311±0。038 比 0。535±0。034,t=9。579、15。520、6。222,P<0。05),而LC3-Ⅱ/Ⅰ和Cleaved PARP蛋白表达高于多柔比星处理组,差异有统计学意义(2。629±0。224 比 1。329±0。152、0。834±0。058 比 0。063±0。017,t=6。800、17。980,P<0。05)。结论 双硫仑/铜复合物联合多柔比星能够协同抑制HepG2肝癌细胞的增殖,其机制可能与抑制HCSCs及干性基因相关蛋白并诱导肝癌细胞发生自噬和凋亡有关。
Effects of disulfiram/copper complex combined with Doxorubicin on proliferation and apoptosis of human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells
Objective To investigate the effects of disulfiram/copper complex(DSF/Cu)com-bined with Doxorubicin on the proliferation and apoptosis of human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells,and to explore the underlying mechanism.Methods The human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line HepG2 was obtained from ATCC cell bank.HepG2 cells were treated with Doxorubicin at concentrations of 5.000,2.500,1.250,0.625,0.313,0.156,0.078,0.039,0.019,and 0.009 µmol/L,as well as with DSF/Cu complexes at the same concentration gradient(with a fixed concentration of 1 µmol/L Cu2+).The half maximal inhibitory concentration(IC50)of both Doxorubicin and DSF/Cu against HepG2 cells was deter-mined using the methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium(MTT)assay.Using the aforementioned concentration gradient of Doxorubicin alone and in combination with 0.15 µmol/L DSF/Cu to treat HepG2 cells,the MTT assay was used to analyze the effects of Doxorubicin alone and in combination with DSF/Cu on the proliferation of HepG2 cells.The combination index(CI)of the two drugs was calculated using CompuSyn software.HepG2 cells were then divided into the following groups:untreated,DMSO-treated,DSF/Cu-treated,Doxorubicin-treated,and Doxorubicin+DSF/Cu-treated groups.Flow cytometry was used to detect changes in the number of ALDH+cells in each group.The sphere formation assay was performed to examine altera-tions in the tumorigenicity of HepG2 cells.Western blotting analysis was conducted to detect the expression levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(Her-2),sex determining region Y box 9(SOX9),c-Myc,LC3-Ⅱ/Ⅰ,and cleaved poly adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase(PARP)proteins in each group.For pairwise comparisons between groups,the paired sample t-test was used,while for comparing multiple means across groups,one-way ANOVA was employed.Results The IC50 for Doxorubicin and DSF/Cu about HepG2 cells after 48 h of treatment was 0.8698 µmol/L and 0.5538μmol/L,respectively.Doxorubicin combined with 0.15 μmol/L DSF/Cu significantly inhibited the proliferation of HepG2 cells compared to Doxorubicin alone(t=8.930,P<0.01).CompuSyn analysis revealed a synergistic effect of Doxorubicin combined with DSF/Cu on inhibiting HepG2 cell proliferation(CI<1).Flow cytometry analy-sis showed that the number of ALDH+HepG2 cells was less in the DSF/Cu-treated group[0.886±0.082)× 105]and Doxorubicin-treated group[(1.374±0.041)× 105]compared to the untreated group[(1.859±0.979)× 105],with statistically significant differences(t=10.800,6.444,P<0.05).The number of ALDH+HepG2 cells in the Doxorubicin+DSF/Cu-treated group[(0.306±0.122)× 105]was significantly less than that in the DSF/Cu-treated group and Doxorubicin-treated group,with statistically significant differences(t=5.590,11.730,P<0.01).The sphere formation assay revealed that the num-ber of HepG2 stem cell spheres was less in the DSF/Cu-treated group(2.167±1.169)and Doxorubicin-treated group(21.170±4.875)compared to the untreated group(46.500±5.357),with statistically sig-nificant differences(t=19.800,8.567,P<0.05).The number of HepG2 stem cell spheres in the Doxo-rubicin+DSF/Cu-treated group(0.833±0.753)was less than that in the Doxorubicin-treated group(21.170±4.875),with a statistically significant difference(t=10.100,P<0.01).There was no statisti-cally significant difference in the number of stem cell spheres between the Doxorubicin+DSF/Cu-treated group and DSF/Cu-treated group(0.833±0.753 vs.2.167±1.169,t=2.349,P>0.05).Western blotting results showed that the expression of Her-2,SOX9,and c-Myc proteins in HepG2 cells was signifi-cantly lower in the DSF/Cu-treated group and Doxorubicin+DSF/Cu-treated group than the untreated group(0.132±0.013 vs.0.049±0.010 vs.0.950±0.052,0.325±0.049 vs.0.311±0.038 vs.0.922±0.027,0.308±0.041 vs.0.235±0.027 vs.0.816±0.092,F=412.50,113.20,47.54,P<0.05),while the expression of LC3-Ⅱ/Ⅰ and Cleaved PARP proteins was higher in the DSF/Cu-trea-ted group and Doxorubicin+DSF/Cu-treated group than in the untreated group(1.527±0.201 vs.2.629±0.224 vs.0.766±0.159,0.906±0.083 vs.0.834±0.058 vs.0.039±0.001,F=35.15,170.40,P<0.05).In the Doxorubicin-treated group,the expression of Her-2 and SOX9 proteins in HepG2 cells was lower than that in the untreated group(0.275±0.018 vs.0.950±0.052,0.535±0.034 vs.0.922±0.027,t=17.440,12.680,P<0.05),but there were no statistically significant differences in the expression of c-Myc,LC3-Ⅱ/Ⅰ,and Cleaved PARP proteins compared to the untreated group(0.914±0.097 vs.0.816±0.092,1.329±0.152 vs.0.766±0.159,0.063±0.017 vs.0.039±0.001,t=1.042,4.205,2.061,P>0.05).In the Doxorubicin+DSF/Cu-treated group,the expression of c-Myc,Her-2 and SOX9 proteins was significantly lower than that in the Doxorubicin-treated group(0.235±0.027 vs.0.914±0.097,0.049±0.010 vs.0.275±0.018,0.311±0.038 vs.0.535±0.034,t=9.579,15.520,6.222,P<0.05),while the expression of LC3-Ⅱ/Ⅰ and Cleaved PARP proteins was higher than that in the Doxorubicin-treated group,with statistically significant differ-ences(2.629±0.224 vs.1.329±0.152,0.834±0.058 vs.0.063±0.017,t=6.800,17.980,P<0.05).Conclusion The combination of DSF/Cu complex and Doxorubicin can synergistically inhibit the proliferation of HepG2 cells,and its mechanism may be related to the inhibition of HCSCs and stemness gene-related proteins,as well as the induction of autophagy and apoptosis in HepG2 cells.

Disulfiram/copper complexDoxorubicinLiver cancerProliferationApop-tosis

张弓、李素新、郭化虎、李路豪、李林、刘兆臣

展开 >

郑州大学第一附属医院肝胆胰外科,郑州 450052

双硫仑/铜复合物 多柔比星 肝癌 增殖 凋亡

2024

中华实验外科杂志
中华医学会

中华实验外科杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.759
ISSN:1001-9030
年,卷(期):2024.41(8)