首页|腔镜乳腺癌改良根治术与开放手术的临床效果比较

腔镜乳腺癌改良根治术与开放手术的临床效果比较

扫码查看
目的 对比使用腔镜技术进行的乳腺癌改良根治术与传统开放的保留乳头乳晕乳腺癌改良根治术两种手术方式治疗早期乳腺癌的短期临床效果。方法 纳入在2021年1月至2023年12月期间就诊于我科的乳腺癌患者92例,其中46例使用腔镜技术进行乳腺癌根治术;46例患者使用传统开放手术进行乳腺癌根治术。两组之间均行保留乳头乳晕的乳腺癌改良根治术,然后分析两组之间临床病理资料、短期结果及初步肿瘤学结果差异。所有患者随访的终点是死亡或者截至2023年6月30日。计量资料使用Student's t检验分析,计数资料采用卡方检验。累积生存率的比较采用Kaplan-Meier曲线以及Log-rank检验,预后相关危险因素采用Cox回归模型分析。结果 两组之间年龄、月经情况、肿瘤部位、肿瘤长度、临床分期及前哨淋巴结数目差异无统计学意义(t=0。045、0。989、0。990、0。366,x2=0。667、0。383,P>0。05)。腔镜手术组所需手术时间[(90。6±10。0)min 比(65。9±11。1)min]长于开放手术组,但术中出血量及术后引流量少于开放手术组[(39。9±8。2)ml比(56。5±12。7)ml]、[(854。4±132。2)ml 比(1 709。9±278。8)ml]、手术切口小于开放手术组[(8。6±1。2)cm比(21。0±3。8)cm]、术后住院时间短于开放手术组[(6。1±0。9)d比(6。7±1。0)d]、术后生活质量及患者满意度高于开放手术组[(93。9%)比(75。5%),t=11。573、7。687、19。408、3。346、3。122,P<0。05]。两组术后并发症发生率两组差异无统计学意义(x2=0。445,P>0。05)。开放手术组与腔镜手术组的3年总生存率与无进展生存率差异均无统计学意义(x2=0。344、0。544,P>0。05)。单因素Cox回归分析显示患者年龄、BMI、月经状况、前哨淋巴结数量、分子分型、T分期及手术方式均不是生存率的独立危险因素。结论 在乳腺癌改良根治术中使用腔镜技术进行乳腺切除安全可行,可明显缩短切口长度,减少术中出血及术后引流;同时也可以获得与开放手术类似的肿瘤学预后。
Clinical effect evaluation of endoscopic radical mastectomy versus open surgery:a retrospective study
Objective To evaluate the safety and oncologic efficacy for endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy in patients with early stage breast cancer.Methods A total of 98 patients who underwent en-doscopic mastectomy or open mastectomy from January 2021 to December 2023 were included in this study.The patients were grouped according to the type of operation(46 in the endoscopic group and 46 in the open group).Both groups were treated with nipple-preserving and areola-preserving modified radical mastecto-my.The short-and long-term outcome was compared between the two groups.All the patients were fol-lowed up until death or last follow-up in June 30,2023.Measurement data were analyzed using Student's t-test and counting data using chi-square test.Cumulative survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier curve and Log-rank test,and prognostic related risk factors were analyzed using Cox regression model.Results There were no statistically significant differences in age,menstrual status,tumor location,tumor length,clinical staging,and number of sentinel lymph nodes between endoscopic group and open group(t=0.045,0.989,0.990,0.366,x2=0.667,0.383,P>0.05).The operation time[(90.6±10.0)min vs.(65.9±11.1)min],average bleeding volume[(39.9±8.2)ml vs.(56.5±12.7)ml],drainage volume[(854.4±132.2)ml vs.(1 709.9±278.8)ml],length of incision[(8.6±1.2)cm vs.(21.0±3.8)cm],and duration of hospital stay[(6.1±0.9)d vs.(6.7±1.0)d]were reduced in pa-tients receiving endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy,and the postoperative quality of life and postoperative satisfactory rate were significantly superior to the open group;but operation time in the endoscopic group[(93.9%)vs.(75.5%)]was longer than that of the open group(t=11.573,7.687,19.408,3.346,3.122,P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications be-tween the two groups(x2=0.445,P>0.05).No significant difference was found in the 3-year OS and PFS rates between the two groups(x2=0.344,0.544,P>0.05).Univariate Cox regression showed that age,BMI,menstrual status,sentinel lymph node number,molecular typing,T stage and surgical proce-dure were not independent prognostic factors.Conclusion Endoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy is supe-rior to open surgery in terms of intraoperative bleeding,postoperative drainage,incision size for early stage breast cancer,and could also attain a stable oncologic outcome for breast cancer.

Breast cancerEndoscopicNipple-preserving and areola-preserving modified rad-ical mastectomyPrognosis

申鹏、曹贝贝、尤伟、刘正义、于博凡、闫园、于洋

展开 >

河南省人民医院乳腺外科,郑州 450000

乳腺癌 腔镜 保留乳头乳晕改良根治术 预后

河南省科技攻关项目河南省医学科技攻关项目河南省部共建重点项目

222102310037LHGJ20220018SBGJ202002102

2024

中华实验外科杂志
中华医学会

中华实验外科杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.759
ISSN:1001-9030
年,卷(期):2024.41(8)