首页|传统开颅血肿清除术和神经内镜血肿清除术对高血压性基底节脑出血的术后炎症、神经功能以及治疗效果影响

传统开颅血肿清除术和神经内镜血肿清除术对高血压性基底节脑出血的术后炎症、神经功能以及治疗效果影响

扫码查看
目的 探讨传统开颅血肿清除术和神经内镜血肿清除术对高血压性基底节区脑出血的治疗效果及其对患者炎症水平和神经功能的影响。方法 选取2021年10月至2023年5月在商丘市第一人民医院接受诊断治疗的首次高血压性基底节区脑出血患者82例,采用抽签法将所有患者分为对照组(41例)和观察组(41例)。对照组给予传统开颅血肿清除术,观察组给予神经内镜血肿清除术。比较两组患者的术中出血量、血肿清除率、术后并发症发生率;患者术后外周血白细胞介素(IL)-1 β、IL-6和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平采用酶联免疫吸附法检测;采用中枢神经特异性蛋白(S100)和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)电化学发光试剂盒检测患者术后S100、NSE血清水平;采用美国国立卫生院卒中量表(NIHSS)评价脑出血患者治疗前后神经功能障碍;采用格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评价脑出血患者治疗前后意识水平。组间计量数据比较采用独立样本t检验。结果 观察组患者的血肿清除率[(90。02±3。95)%]明显高于对照组[(82。07±5。16)%],术中出血量[(33。70±4。16)ml]和术后并发生发生率[4。88%(2/41)]明显低于对照组[(49。67±5。70)ml、21。95%(9/41)],差异有统计学意义(t=7。83、14。49、5。15,P<0。05)。术后3d,观察组患者的血清 TNF-α[(249。41±20。38)pg/ml]、IL-6[(65。56±6。35)pg/ml]、IL-1β[(201。77±19。84)pg/ml]水平均明显低于对照组患者[(312。77±24。20)、(88。40±7。37)、(284。31±19。27)pg/ml],差异有统计学意义(t=12。82、15。03、19。11,P<0。05)。术后3 d,观察组患者的血清S100[(0。29±0。03)μg/L]、NSE[(26。31±3。70)ng/ml]水平均明显低于对照组患者[(0。35±0。04)µg/L、(32。97±4。57)ng/ml],差异有统计学意义(t=8。83、7。25,P<0。05)。治疗前观察组和对照组的NIHSS 评分[(28。27±2。39)、(28。78±2。07)分]和 GCS 评分[(7。80±1。75)、(8。05±1。61)分]比较,差异无统计学意义(t=1。04、0。66,P>0。05)。治疗后观察组患者的NIHSS评分[(15。15±1。13)分]明显低于对照组[(18。17±1。86)分,t=8。91,P<0。05];GCS 评分[(15。07±1。98)分]明显高于对照组[(12。07±1。59)分],差异均有统计学意义(t=7。57,P<0。05)。结论 神经内镜下血肿清除术具有良好的血肿清除效果,能有效降低高血压性基底节区脑出血患者的术中出血量、术后并发症发生率和炎症水平,改善患者的术后神经功能缺损。
Effect of different surgical procedures on hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage in the basal ganglion and their effect on inflammation and neurological function
Objective To investigate the effect of neuroendoscopy and traditional craniotomy on hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage in the basal ganglion and their effect on inflammation and neurologi-cal function.Methods A total of 82 patients with initial hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage in the bas-al ganglion and treated in the First People's Hospital of Shangqiu City from October 2021 to May 2023 were selected,and all patients were divided into control group(41 cases)and observation group(41 cases)u-sing the random number table method.The control group was given traditional craniotomy haematoma re-moval and the observation group was given neuroendoscopy.Intraoperative haemorrhage,haematoma clear-ance,and postoperative complication rates were compared between the two groups.Tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α),interleukin(IL)-6,and IL-1β enzyme linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA)kits were used to detect postoperative TNF-α,IL-6,and IL-1β serum levels.Postoperative serum levels of S100 and neuron specific enolase(NSE)were measured using electrochemiluminescence kits.The NIHSS scores were used to evaluate the neurological dysfunction of cerebral hemorrhage patients,and GCS was used to evaluate the consciousness level of patients with cerebral hemorrhage.Independent sample t test was used to compare the measurement data between groups.Results The haematoma clearance rate[(90.02±3.95)%]of patients in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group[(82.07±5.16)%],and the intraoperative bleeding volume[(33.70±4.16)ml]and postoperative concurrent inci-dence rate[4.88%(2/41)]were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group[(49.67±5.70)ml,21.95%(9/41),t=7.83,14.49,5.15,P<0.05].At 3rd day after surgery,the serum TNF-α[(249.41±20.38)pg/ml],IL-6[(65.56±6.35)pg/ml],and IL-1β[(201.77±19.84)pg/ml]levels in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group[(312.77±24.20),(88.40±7.37),(284.31±19.27)pg/ml,t=12.82,15.03,19.11,P<0.05].At 3rd day after surgery,the serum S100[(0.29±0.03)µg/L]and NSE[(26.31±3.70)ng/ml]levels in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group[(0.35±0.04)µg/L,(32.97±4.57)ng/ml,t=8.83,7.25,P<0.05].There was no significant difference in NIHSS score[(28.27±2.39),(28.78±2.07)points]and GCS score[(7.80±1.75),(8.05±1.61)points]be-tween the observation group and control group before treatment(t=1.04,0.66,P>0.05).After treat-ment,the NIHSS score[(15.15±1.13)points]in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group[(18.17±1.86)points],while the GCS score[(15.07±1.98)points]was signifi-cantly higher in the observation group than that in the control group[(12.07±1.59)points,t=8.91,7.57,P<0.05].Conclusion Neuroendoscopy has good haematoma removal effect,reduces the amount of intraoperative haemorrhage,the incidence of postoperative complications and the level of inflammation in patients,and improves the postoperative neurological deficits in patients.

NeuroendoscopyHypertensive intracerebral hemorrhageInflammatory factorNeurological function

孙向、刘永生、郭士琨、苗鹏飞

展开 >

商丘市第一人民医院神经外科,商丘 476000

神经内镜血肿清除术 高血压性脑出血 炎性因子 神经功能

河南省医学科技攻关计划联合共建项目

LHGJ20210989

2024

中华实验外科杂志
中华医学会

中华实验外科杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.759
ISSN:1001-9030
年,卷(期):2024.41(8)