首页|超级面纱法3D腹腔镜下经腹膜外途径治疗局限性前列腺癌的临床应用

超级面纱法3D腹腔镜下经腹膜外途径治疗局限性前列腺癌的临床应用

扫码查看
目的 探讨超级面纱法3D腹腔镜下经腹膜外前列腺切除术在基层医院治疗局限性前列腺癌的可行性。方法 回顾性分析2020年1月至2022年12月在宁波市泌尿肾病医院进行3D腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术的88例临床局限期前列腺癌患者的临床资料,根据手术技术差异分为超级面纱组(39例)和对照组(49例)。两组患者纳入排除标准相同,术前排尿正常、规律性生活,术前临床分期cT1~2N0M0。超级面纱组采用既往报道的超级面沙法完成手术,保留前列腺周围组织结构并重建,对照组采用其他手术技术。记录并对比两组间手术时间、术中出血、术后病理情况、术后随访前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)指标、尿失禁恢复及性功能恢复时间等。计量资料采用独立样本t检验、计数数据以卡方检验进行统计分析。结果 所有患者无二次手术、中转开放、中途改变手术方式或术后非计划再次入院等记录。超级面纱组的手术时间、预计手术失血量高于对照组[(177。3±56。3)min、(130。5±69。7)ml 比(159。9±44。4)min、(117。9±65。4)ml,t=1。621、0。878,P>0。05],差异无统计学意义。尿控方面,超级面纱法组在即刻、1个月及3个月的尿控恢复率高于对照组(33。3%、71。8%、87。2%比 14。3%、32。7%、57。1%,x2=6。075、13。308、9。476,P<0。05),差异有统计学意义。性功能恢复方面,1个月及12个月IIEF评分≥12分的患者比例在超级面纱法组中高于对照组(30。8%、64。1%比10。2%、42。9%,x2=5。893、3。929,P<0。05),差异有统计学意义。结论 超级面纱法3D腹腔镜手术在基层医院应用可行,有望提高患者生活质量,减少对高级医疗资源的需求。
Application of super-veil technique in 3D laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer
Objective To explore the feasibility of performing extraperitoneal 3D laparoscopic radi-cal prostatectomy with the super-Veil technique for treating localized prostate cancer in community hospi-tals.Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 88 patients with clinically localized pros-tate cancer who underwent 3D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at Ningbo Urological and Nephrology Hos-pital from January 2020 to December 2022.Patients were divided into the super-Veil group and the control group based on surgical technique differences.Inclusion and exclusion criteria were the same for both groups,with normal preoperative urination,regular lifestyle,and preoperative clinical staging of cT1-2 N0M0.The super-Veil group underwent surgery using the previously reported super-Veil technique that pre-serves and reconstructs the periprostatic anatomical structures.The control group underwent other surgical techniques.Operative time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative pathological findings,postoperative prostate specific antigen(PSA)levels,urinary continence recovery,and sexual function recovery time were recorded and compared between groups.Quantitative data were analyzed using t-tests and count data using chi-square tests.Results No patients required secondary surgery,conversion to open surgery,intraopera-tive change of surgical method,or unplanned re-admission postoperatively.No significant differences were found in baseline clinical characteristics,postoperative pathological findings,or positive surgical margin rates between the two groups.The super-Veil group had longer operative time[(177.3±56.3)min vs.(159.9±44.4)min,t=1.621,P>0.05]and greater estimated blood loss[(130.5±69.7)ml vs.(117.9±65.4)ml,t=0.878,P>0.05]than controls,but the differences were not statistically signifi-cant.Regarding urinary continence recovery,the super-Veil group had significantly higher rates immediate-ly,at 1 month,and 3 months postoperatively(33.3%,71.8%,87.2%vs.14.3%,32.7%,57.1%,X2=6.075,13.308,9.476,P<0.05).For sexual function recovery,a higher proportion of the super-Veil group had IIEF scores ≥12 at 1 and 12 months postoperatively(30.8%and 64.1%vs.10.2%and 42.9%for controls,x2==5.893,3.929,P<0.05).Conclusion The super-Veil technique for 3D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is feasible in community hospitals and may improve patients'quality of life while reducing the need for advanced medical resources.

Super veilLaparoscopyRadical prostatectomy

宋灵敏、王钢、李毛毛、郑利伟、翁国斌

展开 >

浙江省宁波市泌尿肾病医院泌尿外科,宁波 315192

超级面纱法 腹腔镜 根治性前列腺切除术

2024

中华实验外科杂志
中华医学会

中华实验外科杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.759
ISSN:1001-9030
年,卷(期):2024.41(9)