首页|黎立武的《中庸》诠释——兼与朱子《中庸》诠释之对比

黎立武的《中庸》诠释——兼与朱子《中庸》诠释之对比

扫码查看
黎立武继承和发展了兼山学派以《易》释《中庸》的诠释路向.他围绕"性""道""教""中庸"等范畴将《中庸》重新划分为五大节十五章,又将《中庸》内容归之于"中"与"庸"两系统之下;他用《乾》《坤》两卦来诠释"中""庸",又根据《乾》卦推论出"中"与"庸"是体用关系;他将《乾》卦与《中庸》圣人之道结合起来,指出"中"是圣人心法,"德"与"位"是实现"道统"的条件,并重构了"道统"谱系.黎立武《易》学路向的《中庸》诠释与当时流行的朱子心性路向的《中庸》诠释有诸多不同,二者是洛学内部《中庸》诠释的不同分支.考察黎立武的《中庸》诠释,有利于我们理清宋元之际学术发展的实际状况,认清洛学内部《中庸》诠释的多样性、开放性,此外,其对元明清时期的《中庸》诠释也产生了一定的影响.
On Li Liwu's Interpretation to The Doctrine of the Mean——Also on a Comparison with Zhu Zi's Interpretation
Li Liwu inherited and developed the theory of Jianshan School,which explained The Doctrine of the Mean with The Book of Changes.Li recognized"Zhong"and"Yong"as the two main systems of The Doctrine of the Mean,then re-organized the work into five major sections and fifteen chapters with concepts of"Xing""Dao""Jiao"and"Zhongyong".He interpreted"Zhong"and"Yong"with"Qian"and"Kun",and defined their relationship as noumenon and function.Combining Qian with The Doctrine of the Mean,Li believed that"Zhong"is the core spirit of Confucian orthodoxy,while"De"and"Wei"were necessary conditions for achieving the orthodoxy.Li's interpretation were quite different from Zhu Zi's thoughts,which was more popular then and interpreted The Doctrine of the Mean with the theory of Xinxing,both of them derived from Luoxue.A review on Li's interpretation is beneficial for us to clarify the actual situation of academic development during Late Song and Early Yuan era and to recognize the diversity and openness of the Luoxue School.Moreover,Li's interpretation also had a certain influence on the interpretation of The Doctrine of the Mean during the Yuan,Ming,and Qing dynasties.

Li LiwuZhu ZiThe Doctrine of the MeanThe Book of Changes"Zhong""Yong"Confucian Orthodoxy

张卉

展开 >

西南财经大学社会发展研究院,四川 成都 611130

黎立武 朱子 《中庸》 《易》 "中" "庸" "道统"

2024

中华文化论坛
四川省社会科学院

中华文化论坛

CSTPCDCHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.184
ISSN:1008-0139
年,卷(期):2024.(6)