首页|不同型号鼠夹和不同诱饵在农村地区捕鼠效果比较

不同型号鼠夹和不同诱饵在农村地区捕鼠效果比较

扫码查看
目的 通过比较不同型号鼠夹搭配不同诱饵的捕鼠效果,为今后工作中合理选择鼠夹和诱饵提供依据.方法 使用中号钢板夹和大号钢板夹分别搭配生花生米和鲜肉交替布放在农村居民区和农田,比较捕获率及鼠种构成.结果 大号鼠夹捕获率高于中号鼠夹(P<0.001,OR=3.280,95%CI:2.414~4.456),用鲜肉作为诱饵的捕获率低于生花生米(P=0.020,OR=0.723,95%CI:0.550~0.950),大号鼠夹和生花生米饵在捕获农田优势鼠种黑线姬鼠方面有优势,大号鼠夹更容易捕获到体型较大的褐家鼠.结论 不同鼠夹型号和诱饵对于捕鼠效果影响较大,建议鼠害监测可用大号鼠夹和生花生米.
Comparison of the capture efficacy of different types of snap traps with different baits against rodent in rural areas
Objective In order to provide evidences for choice of snap trap and bait during rodent surveillance,the capture efficacy of different types of snap trap with different baits were compared.Methods Thecapture rate and species composition of rodent were compared by medium and large trap were placed alternately in rural residential areas and farmland with raw peanuts and fresh meat,respectively.Results The capture rate of large trap was higher than that of medium trap(P=0.000,OR=3.280,95%CI:2.414-4.456),and the capture rate of fresh meat as bait was lower than that of raw peanut(P=0.020,OR=0.723,95%CI:0.550-0.950).Larger trap with raw peanutbait had advantages in capturing Apodemus agrarius,the dominant species in farmland,and large trap was easier to capture larger rattus norvegicus.Conclusion The different type of traps and baits have great influence on the capture efficacy.It is suggested to select large trap with raw peanut.

snap traptypebaitcapture rate

郝海波、聂晓培、刘卓、刘天、陈军、阮德欣

展开 >

荆州市疾病预防控制中心,湖北 荆州 434000

鼠夹 型号 诱饵 捕获率

重大传染病防控项目(2022)

10000019Z195110010004

2024

中华卫生杀虫药械
南京军区疾病预防控制中心

中华卫生杀虫药械

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.566
ISSN:1671-2781
年,卷(期):2024.30(2)
  • 14