首页|功能性肛门直肠痛患者高分辨率肛门直肠测压特征研究

功能性肛门直肠痛患者高分辨率肛门直肠测压特征研究

扫码查看
目的 通过高分辨率肛门直肠测压(HR-ARM)探讨功能性肛门直肠痛(FAP)患者的肛门直肠动力和感觉特征.方法 回顾性收集2020年1月1日至2022年1月31日南京中医药大学附属南京中医院收治的行HR-ARM检查的81例FAP患者(FAP组)的临床资料,同期招募80名健康志愿者作为健康对照组.分析FAP组与健康对照组,FAP组内不同性别患者,以及FAP组内不同亚型(痉挛性肛门痛、肛提肌综合征、非特异性FAP)患者的HR-ARM特征,包括肛管静息压、肛管收缩压、模拟排便时直肠压力、模拟排便时肛管残余压、矛盾性收缩、初始感觉阈值、便意感阈值、排便窘迫感阈值、最大耐受感阈值.采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估FAP组患者的疼痛程度,采用Spearman相关分析VAS与HR-ARM 参数的相关性.统计学方法采用独立样本t检验、最小显著差异法、塔姆黑尼72检验和Mann-Whitney U检验.结果 FAP组肛管静息压、肛管收缩压、模拟排便时肛管残余压、排便窘迫感阈值、最大耐受感阈值均低于健康对照组[(59.56±24.71)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)比(81.94±15.87)mmHg、(119.04±46.94)mmHg 比(154.62±37.95)mmHg、59.00(40.75,80.95)mmHg 比83.10(61.78,94.30)mmHg、70.00(55.00,90.00)mL 比 85.00(60.00,110.00)mL、105.00(87.50,150.00)mL比 140.00(100.00,180.00)mL],差异均有统计学意义(t=-6.83、-5.29,Z=-4.12、-3.12、-2.82;均P<0.01).FAP组男性患者模拟排便时直肠压力高于健康对照组男性,排便窘迫感阈值低于健康对照组男性[42.40(29.60,57.95)mmHg 比 31.10(25.85,36.80)mmHg、80.00(62.50,107.50)mL 比92.00(81.00,140.00)mL],差异均有统计学意义(Z=-1.99、-2.53,均P<0.05)].FAP组女性患者的肛管静息压、肛管收缩压、模拟排便时肛管残余压、排便窘迫感阈值、最大耐受感阈值均低于健康对照组女性[(55.67±21.61)mmHg 比(87.04±15.54)mmHg、(102.70±37.09)mmHg 比(155.98±31.44)mmHg、52.55(40.53,67.48)mmHg 比 83.10(61.10,94.50)mmHg、60.00(52.50,81.50)mL 比 80.00(60.00,100.00)mL、101.00(80.00,128.75)mL 比 120.00(94.00,155.00)mL],差异均有统计学意义(t=-8.77、-8.16,Z=-4.57、-2.24、-2.14;均P<0.05).FAP组女性患者的肛管静息压、肛管收缩压、模拟排便时肛管残余压、矛盾性收缩发生率、便意感阈值、排便窘迫感阈值均低于 FAP 组男性患者[(55.67±21.61)mmHg 比(68.28±29.16)mmHg、(102.70±37.09)mmHg 比(155.62±46.66)mmHg、52.55(40.53,67.48)mmHg 比 79.00(59.55,99.25)mmHg、28.6%(16/56)比68.0%(17/25)、44.00(35.00,60.00)mL 比 60.00(45.00,70.00)mL、60.00(52.50,81.50)mL 比80.00(62.50,107.50)mL],差异均有统计学意义(t=2.17、5.47,Z=-2.96,x2=11.10,Z=-2.93、-2.34;均P<0.05).痉挛性肛门痛亚型FAP患者的肛管收缩压高于肛提肌综合征亚型患者[(140.19±56.51)mmHg比(80.56±30.79)mmHg],最大耐受感阈值低于非特异性FAP亚型患者[(87.86±17.80)mL 比(125.14±48.31)mL],差异均有统计学意义(t=2.35、2.02,均 P<0.05).Spearman相关分析显示,FAP组患者的VAS与肛管静息压、肛管收缩压、排便窘迫感阈值均呈负相关(r=-0.28、-0.23、-0.24,均P<0.05).结论 FAP存在肛门直肠动力异常和感觉功能障碍,可能与盆底肌异常、排便时肌肉协调障碍、直肠高敏感性有关.
A study on the characteristics of high-resolution anorectal manometry in patients with functional anorectal pain
Objective To explore the characteristics of anorectal motility and sensation in patients with functional anorectal pain(FAP)by high-resolution anorectal manometry(HR-ARM).Methods The clinical data of 81 FAP patients(FAP group)who underwent HR-ARM in Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine from January 1,2020 to January 31,2022 were retrospectively collected,and 80 healthy volunteers were recruited as healthy control group during the same period.The HR-ARM characteristics were compared between FAP group and the healthy control group,between the patients with different genders in the FAP group,the patients with different subtypes(proctalgia fugax,levator syndrome,and non-specific FAP)in the FAP group,which included anal resting pressure,anal squeeze pressure,rectal pressure during simulated defecation,anal residual pressure during simulated defecation,paradoxical contractions,initial sensation threshold,defecation threshold,defecation urgency threshold,and tolerance threshold.Visual analogue scale(VAS)was used to assess the pain level of the patients in the FAP group,and Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between VAS and HR-ARM characteristics.Independent sample t-test,least significant difference test,Tamhane's 72 test,and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis.Results The anal resting pressure,anal squeeze pressure,anal residual pressure during simulated defecation,defecation urgency threshold,and tolerance threshold of the FAP group were all lower than those of the healthy control group((59.56±24.71)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)vs.(81.94±15.87)mmHg,(119.04±46.94)mmHg vs.(154.62±37.95)mmHg,59.00(40.75,80.95)mmHg vs.83.10(61.78,94.30)mmHg,70.00(55.00,90.00)mL vs.85.00(60.00,110.00)mL,105.00(87.50,150.00)mL us.140.00(100.00,180.00)mL),and the differences were all statistically significant(t=-6.83 and-5.29,Z=-4.12,-3.12 and-2.82;all P<0.01).The rectal pressure during simulated defecation of male patients in the FAP group was higher than that of males in the healthy control group,and the defecation urgency threshold was lower than that of males in the healthy control group(42.40(29.60,57.95)mmHg vs.31.10(25.85,36.80)mmHg,80.00(62.50,107.50)mLvs.92.00(81.00,140.00)mL),and the differences were statistically significant(Z=-1.99 and-2.53,both P<0.05).The anal resting pressure,anal squeeze pressure,anal residual pressure during simulated defecation,defecation urgency threshold,and tolerance threshold of female patients in FAP group were all lower than those of female in the healthy control group((55.67±21.61)mmHg vs.(87.04±15.54)mmHg,(102.70±37.09)mmHg vs.(155.98±31.44)mmHg,52.55(40.53,67.48)mmHg vs.83.10(61.10,94.50)mmHg,60.00(52.50,81.50)mL vs.80.00(60.00,100.00)mL,101.00(80.00,128.75)mL vs.120.00(94.00,155.00)mL),and the differences were statistically significant(t=-8.77 and-8.16,Z=-4.57,-2.24 and-2.14;all P<0.05).The anal resting pressure,anal squeeze pressure,anal residual pressure during simulated defecation,incidence rate of paradoxical contractions,defecation urgency threshold,and tolerance threshold of female patients in FAP group were all lower than those of male patients in FAP group((55.67±21.61)mmHg vs.(68.28±29.16)mmHg,(102.70±37.09)mmHg vs.(155.62±46.66)mmHg,52.55(40.53,67.48)mmHg vs.79.00(59.55,99.25)mmHg,28.6%(16/56)vs.68.0%(17/25),44.00(35.00,60.00)mL vs.60.00(45.00,70.00)mL,60.00(52.50,81.50)mL vs.80.00(62.50,107.50)mL),and the differences were statistically significant(t=2.17 and 5.47,Z=-2.96,x2=11.10,Z=-2.93 and-2.34;all P<0.05).The anal squeeze pressure of patients with proctalgia fugax subtype was higher than that of patients with levator syndrome subtype((140.19±56.51)mmHg vs.(80.56±30.79)mmHg),and the tolerance threshold was lower than that of patients with non-specific FAP subtype((87.86±17.80)mL vs.(125.14±48.31)mL),and the differences were statistically significant(t=2.35 and 2.02,both P<0.05).The results of Spearman correlation analysis showed that VAS was negatively correlated with anal resting pressure,anal squeeze pressure,and defecation urgency threshold in the patients of the FAP group(r=-0.28,-0.23,and-0.24;all P<0.05).Conclusion The presence of anorectal dismotility and sensory dysfunction in FAP may be related to pelvic floor muscle abnormalities,muscle coordination disorders during defecation,and rectal hypersensitivity.

Functional anorectal painHigh-resolution anorectal manometryAnorectal motilityRectal sensory function

郑鸿雁、刘璠、孙梦洋、刘锦、冯程静、倪敏

展开 >

南京中医药大学附属南京中医院(南京市中医院)肛肠科,南京 210022

功能性肛门直肠痛 高分辨率肛门直肠测压 肛门直肠动力 直肠感觉功能

江苏省重点研发计划社会发展项目

BE2022673

2024

中华消化杂志
中华医学会

中华消化杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.726
ISSN:0254-1432
年,卷(期):2024.44(4)
  • 8