中华医学杂志2017,Vol.97Issue(6) :443-446.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.06.009

动脉血管入路法在直肠癌淋巴结分检中的价值

The advantage of artery approach in lymph node sorting of rectal cancer

赵玉洲 韩广森 霍明科 冯稳 李剑 顾焱晖 马鹏飞 刘晨宇 张俊立
中华医学杂志2017,Vol.97Issue(6) :443-446.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.06.009

动脉血管入路法在直肠癌淋巴结分检中的价值

The advantage of artery approach in lymph node sorting of rectal cancer

赵玉洲 1韩广森 1霍明科 1冯稳 1李剑 1顾焱晖 1马鹏飞 1刘晨宇 1张俊立1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 450008郑州,河南省肿瘤医院(郑州大学附属肿瘤医院)外科
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 探讨动脉血管入路法在直肠癌淋巴结分检中的技术优势.方法 选择2015年7月至2016年1月在河南省肿瘤医院普外科住院的60例直肠癌患者,数字表法随机分为血管入路组(观察组)和传统方法组(对照组),对照两组检出淋巴结总数、平均检出淋巴结数、淋巴结<12枚人数、阳性淋巴结数、淋巴结阳性率、患者转移率、平均直径<5 mm数、平均直径<5 mm阳性淋巴结数、第1、2、3站淋巴结数和淋巴结分检时间等指标.结果 观察组检出淋巴结总数和阳性淋巴结总数均高于对照组(553:395,96:54);平均检出淋巴结数[(18.43±5.93)个∶(13.27±1.96)个,P=0.000]、淋巴结分检时间[(14.1±2.5)min:(17.4 ±3.2)min,P=0.000]、平均直径<5 mm数(4.73±1.31):(1.23 ±1.14),P=0.000)、平均直径<5 mm阳性淋巴结(0.97±1.03)∶(0.20±0.55)个,(P =0.010)、第一站淋巴结[(8.17±4.58)个∶(5.07±1.96)个,P=0.000]和第二站淋巴结数[(6.57±1.87)个∶(4.90±1.69)个,P=0.001]等指标差异均有统计学意义有.淋巴结<12枚人数、淋巴结阳性率、患者转移率和第三站淋巴结数等差异均无统计学意义(均P≥0.05).结论 采用动脉血管入路方法在直肠癌淋巴结分检中具有操作简便,获取淋巴结数目多,更有利于准确病理分期等优点.

Abstract

Objective To explore the technical advantages of artery approach in lymph node sortingofrectal cancer.Methods Sixty patients with rectal cancer who treated in general surgery department of Henan provincial tumor hospitalfrom July 2015 to January 2016 were enrolled.Patientswere divided into two groupsrandomly.Lymph node sorting methods of control group andobservation group were the traditional method and the artery approach method respectively.The total number of lymph nodes,the average inspection number,the patients number of lymph nodes less than 12,the number of positive lymph nodes,the metastasis rate of the patients,the number of average diameter less than 5 mm,the number of the positive lymph nodes which average diameter less than 5 mm,the sorting time of lymph nodes,the total number of every stationand other indicators were collected and compared.Results There wasa significant difference between the observation group and the control groupin the total number(553 vs 395,P < 0.05),the number of positive ones(96 vs 54,P < 0.05),average inspection number(18.43 ± 5.93 vs 13.27 ±1.96,P =0.000),the sorting time (min) (14.1 ±2.5 vs 17.4 ±3.2,P =0.000),the average diameter less than 5 mm number(4.73 ± 1.31 vs 1.23 ± 1.14,P =0.000),the number of positive ones average diameter less than 5 mm(0.97 ± 1.03 vs 0.20 ±0.55,P =0.010),the first(8.17 ±4.58 vs 5.07 ± 1.96,P =0.000) and second station(6.57 ± 1.87 vs 4.90 ± 1.69,P =0.001)inspection number.The inspection number less than 12,the positive rate of lymph node,the metastatic rate of the patient and the inspection number of third station have no significant differences (all P ≥ 0.05).Conclusion Theartery approach method inrectal cancer lymph node inspectionhas many advantages such as simple operation,obtaining more lymph nodes and more accurate pathological staging.

关键词

直肠肿瘤/血管入路/淋巴结

Key words

Rectal neoplasms/Artery approach/Lymph node

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

河南省科技厅科技攻关项目(162102310151)

出版年

2017
中华医学杂志
中华医学会

中华医学杂志

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.477
ISSN:0376-2491
被引量2
参考文献量14
段落导航相关论文