首页|化学发光法丁型肝炎病毒IgG抗体检测试剂性能评价

化学发光法丁型肝炎病毒IgG抗体检测试剂性能评价

扫码查看
目的 对抗丁型肝炎病毒(HDV)IgG试剂(化学发光法)的性能进行评价。 方法 用基于磁微粒化学发光免疫分析平台的抗-HDV IgG试剂、厦门万泰凯瑞抗-HDV IgG试剂(国产试剂A)、基于酶联免疫吸附法的北京万泰抗-HDV IgG试剂(国产试剂B)和基于荧光定量PCR检测平台的HDV RNA试剂分别对1 909例乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)阳性样本进行检测,并结合检测的阴/阳性结果评价3种抗体试剂的特异度和正确率之间的差异;同时,参照美国临床和实验室标准化协会的EP5-A2文件,采用高、中和低3个浓度水平的阳性样本对抗-HDV IgG试剂进行精密度评价。用抗-HDV IgG试剂对545份HBsAg阳性且HDV IgG阴性样本和北京大学肝炎试剂研究中心的200份甲型肝炎病毒IgM抗体(HAV IgM)阳性样本、350份丙型肝炎病毒抗体(anti-HCV)阳性样本、200份健康人体检样本进行检测,以评价抗-HDV IgG试剂的特异性。最后,用抗-HDV IgG试剂与国产试剂A测试545例HBsAg阳性且抗-HDV IgG阴性样本和37例抗-HDV IgG阳性样本,对抗-HDV IgG试剂的符合率进行评价。 结果 4种试剂在对1 909份HBsAg阳性样本的检测中,筛查到19份抗-HDV IgG真阳性样本;抗-HDV IgG试剂的正确率和特异度较好;抗-HDV IgG试剂对高、中和低3个水平样本检测的批内精密度CV值在1.57%~4.30%之间,批间精密度CV值在1.71%~4.67%之间,精密度良好;与国产试剂A进行比较,阴/阳性符合率一致。 结论 本研究中抗-HDV IgG试剂(化学发光法)对临床样本的检测具有较高特异度,表现出与商品化试剂一致的符合率,可用于HBsAg阳性样本中抗-HDV IgG的筛查。 Objective This study evaluates the performance of chemiluminescence assay, which is designed to detect Hepatitis D Virus (HDV) Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies. Methods A comparative analysis was conducted among chemiluminescence anti-HDV IgG reagent, the magnetic particle-based domestic reagent A and domestic reagent B, and the Robo Gene HDV RNA kit, using 1909 HBsAg-positive plasma samples. This comparison aimed to delineate clinical specificity and detection accuracy. The anti-HDV IgG reagent precision was assessed at three different concentration levels following the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute EP5-A2 guidelines. The specificity of the assay was validated using 200 HAV IgM positive, 545 HBsAg-positive but anti-HDV IgG-negative, 350 anti HCV positive plasma samples and 200 healthy human blood samples. Additionally, a concordance study was conducted with 545 HBsAg-positive and 37 anti-HDV IgG-positive plasma samples, comparing the anti-HDV IgG reagent against reagent A. Results 1 909 HBsAg-positive plasma samples were tested using 3 anti HDV IgG reagent and 1 HDV RNA reagent, 19 samples were identified as anti-HDV IgG-positive. The anti-HDV IgG demonstrated superior accuracy and specificity. The assay exhibited excellent precision, with intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) values ranging from 1.57% to 4.30%, and inter-assay CV values between 1.71% and 4.67% for detecting samples at high, medium, and low concentration levels. Concordance with Reagent A showed consistent results in both positive and negative detections. Conclusion In this study, the anti-HDV IgG reagent (chemiluminescence method) displayed outstanding specificity in detecting clinical samples and exhibited a high conformity rate with commercialized reagents, making it potentially suitable for screening anti-HDV IgG in HBsAg-positive samples.
Evaluation of chemiluminescence immunoassay kit for detection of hepatitis D virus IgG antibody
Objective This study evaluates the performance of chemiluminescence assay, which is designed to detect Hepatitis D Virus (HDV) Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies. Methods A comparative analysis was conducted among chemiluminescence anti-HDV IgG reagent, the magnetic particle-based domestic reagent A and domestic reagent B, and the Robo Gene HDV RNA kit, using 1909 HBsAg-positive plasma samples. This comparison aimed to delineate clinical specificity and detection accuracy. The anti-HDV IgG reagent precision was assessed at three different concentration levels following the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute EP5-A2 guidelines. The specificity of the assay was validated using 200 HAV IgM positive, 545 HBsAg-positive but anti-HDV IgG-negative, 350 anti HCV positive plasma samples and 200 healthy human blood samples. Additionally, a concordance study was conducted with 545 HBsAg-positive and 37 anti-HDV IgG-positive plasma samples, comparing the anti-HDV IgG reagent against reagent A. Results 1 909 HBsAg-positive plasma samples were tested using 3 anti HDV IgG reagent and 1 HDV RNA reagent, 19 samples were identified as anti-HDV IgG-positive. The anti-HDV IgG demonstrated superior accuracy and specificity. The assay exhibited excellent precision, with intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) values ranging from 1.57% to 4.30%, and inter-assay CV values between 1.71% and 4.67% for detecting samples at high, medium, and low concentration levels. Concordance with Reagent A showed consistent results in both positive and negative detections. Conclusion In this study, the anti-HDV IgG reagent (chemiluminescence method) displayed outstanding specificity in detecting clinical samples and exhibited a high conformity rate with commercialized reagents, making it potentially suitable for screening anti-HDV IgG in HBsAg-positive samples.

Hepatitis DHepatitis D Virusanti-HDV IgGChemiluminescence method

袁榕晨、程方明、向宽辉、李永聪、黄天逊、田振超、刘雄伟、王晓忠、王转国、马亚红、周晶、戴二黑、钱纯亘、李彤、沈弢、程邦宁、唐栋

展开 >

北京大学肝炎试剂研究中心,北京 100191

北京大学-亚辉龙感染性疾病分子诊断联合实验室,北京 100191

北京大学医学部病原生物学系和感染病研究中心,北京 100191

深圳市龙岗中心医院检验科,深圳 518116

新疆维吾尔自治区中医院肝病科,乌鲁木齐 830099

内蒙古国际蒙医医院检验科,呼和浩特 010013

河北省石家庄第五医院肝病科,石家庄 050021

展开 >

肝炎,丁型 丁型肝炎病毒 抗-HDV IgG 化学发光法

国家自然科学基金科技部重大传染病防治专项

820723262012ZX10002003-003-013

2024

中华检验医学杂志
中华医学会

中华检验医学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.402
ISSN:1009-9158
年,卷(期):2024.47(3)
  • 17