首页|论袭警罪中暴力袭击认定的困境与出路——以1150份刑事裁判文书的分析为切入

论袭警罪中暴力袭击认定的困境与出路——以1150份刑事裁判文书的分析为切入

An Empirical Study on the Dilemma and Solution of the Identification of Violent Attacks in the Crime of Assaulting Police officers—Based on the Analysis of 1150 Criminal Judgment Documents

扫码查看
暴力袭击行为是袭警罪认定的核心要素.对现有刑事裁判文书的实证研究表明,实践中控辩审三方对于该行为的认定存在分歧,造成分歧的关键在于法益识别的差异.为更好实现对暴力袭击行为的有效认定,有必要基于暴力袭击行为的认定困境进行合目的性检视,进而实现由单一法益观到层次法益观的转变.在层次法益观的指导下,本罪应以维护公务秩序为阻挡层法益,以保护人民警察的人身安全为背后层法益,围绕袭击对象、结果轻重、行为类型确立暴力袭击认定的具体方案,以实现对这一不法情形可罚性的准确判断.
Violent attacks are the core elements in determining the crime of assaulting police officers.An empirical study of 1,010 criminal judgments shows that in practice,there are differences in the identification of this behavior among the prosecution,defense and judges,and the key to the differences lies in the difference in the identification of legal interests.In order to better achieve the effective identification of violent attacks,it is necessary to conduct a purposeful review based on the dilemma of identifying violent attacks,and then achieve the transformation from a single legal interest to a hierarchical legal interest.Under the guidance of the hierarchical legal interest,this crime should take the maintenance of public order as the barrier legal interest and the protection of the personal safety of the people's police as the underlying legal interest,and establish a specific plan for the identification of violent attacks around the target of the attack,the severity of the result,and the type of behavior,so as to achieve an accurate judgment on the punishability of this illegal situation.

Crime of Assaulting Police OfficersViolent AttacksHierarchical Legal InterestStandardized Governance

汪恭政、林祺璇

展开 >

浙江工商大学法学院

袭警罪 暴力袭击 层次法益观 规范治理

2024

公安学刊-浙江警察学院学报
浙江警察学院 浙江省警察协会 浙江省刑事犯罪学学会 浙江省青少年犯罪研究会

公安学刊-浙江警察学院学报

影响因子:0.21
ISSN:1674-3040
年,卷(期):2024.(6)