我国股东失权制度构成与体系性协调
The Composition and Systemic Coordination of Shareholder Disenfranchisement in China
熊清莲 1秦建琪2
作者信息
- 1. 西南政法大学,重庆 401120
- 2. 重庆太极实业(集团)股份有限公司,重庆 408099
- 折叠
摘要
《公司法》第五十二条在股东失权制度方面完成了从无到有的突破,在一定程度上对因股东出资引发的纠纷激增的现状做出了正面回应.但该项条款在制度构成上有诸多内容尚不明确,需明确其制度功能并进一步细化解释.同时,股东失权制度适用的全过程牵涉公司法其他制度,从全过程适用的角度如何与相关制度协调等问题,仍待进一步厘清.在失权程序启动时,董事的失权催缴义务须区别于常规催缴义务,二者对失权程序启动的意义不同.在具体适用过程中,因股东失权制度已经实质吸纳了"股东除名"制度,所以股东失权制度优先适用.在股东丧失因其未缴纳出资的股权后,失权股东仍无法免除对公司和债权人的赔偿责任.
Abstract
Article 52 of the Company Law represents a groundbreaking achievement in establishing the disenfranchisement of shareholders system,which positively addresses the rapid surge in disputes arising from shareholders'capital contributions.However,this provision remains vague in several aspects of its institutional framework,necessitating clarification of its functional objectives and further detailed explanations.Moreover,the application of the shareholder disenfranchisement system entails interactions with other company law regimes,and it is imperative to clarify how to harmonize it with related systems from a holistic perspective.When initiating the disenfranchisement process,the directors'obligation to call for payment in the context of disenfranchisement must be distinguished from regular payment reminders,as they serve different purposes in triggering the disenfranchisement procedure.In specific applications,since the shareholder disenfranchisement system essentially incorporates the"expulsion of shareholders"system,the former takes precedence.Once a shareholder loses their equity due to unpaid capital contributions,they remain liable for compensation to the company and creditors.
关键词
股东失权/体系协调/公司法Key words
Disenfranchisement of Shareholders/Removal of Shareholders/Company Law引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据